FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From a1fbc6750e212c5675a4e48d7f51d44607eb8756 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 19:04:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on
 32bit arch

On 32-bit systems, this shift will overflow for files larger than 4GB as
start_index is unsigned long while the calls to btrfs_delalloc_*_space
expect u64.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Fixes: df480633b891 ("btrfs: extent-tree: Switch to new delalloc space reserve and release")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ define the variable instead of repeating the shift ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index ab408a23ba32..69a384145dc6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1274,6 +1274,7 @@ static int cluster_pages_for_defrag(struct inode *inode,
 	u64 page_start;
 	u64 page_end;
 	u64 page_cnt;
+	u64 start = (u64)start_index << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int ret;
 	int i;
 	int i_done;
@@ -1290,8 +1291,7 @@ static int cluster_pages_for_defrag(struct inode *inode,
 	page_cnt = min_t(u64, (u64)num_pages, (u64)file_end - start_index + 1);
 
 	ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(BTRFS_I(inode), &data_reserved,
-			start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
-			page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT);
+			start, page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	i_done = 0;
@@ -1380,8 +1380,7 @@ again:
 		btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), 1);
 		spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
 		btrfs_delalloc_release_space(BTRFS_I(inode), data_reserved,
-				start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				(page_cnt - i_done) << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
+				start, (page_cnt - i_done) << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
 	}
 
 
@@ -1408,8 +1407,7 @@ out:
 		put_page(pages[i]);
 	}
 	btrfs_delalloc_release_space(BTRFS_I(inode), data_reserved,
-			start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
-			page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
+			start, page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
 	btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT);
 	extent_changeset_free(data_reserved);
 	return ret;

Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:49:26PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Patch below generated against 5.4.67

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> >From a1fbc6750e212c5675a4e48d7f51d44607eb8756 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 19:04:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on
>  32bit arch
> 
> On 32-bit systems, this shift will overflow for files larger than 4GB as
> start_index is unsigned long while the calls to btrfs_delalloc_*_space
> expect u64.
> 
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
> Fixes: df480633b891 ("btrfs: extent-tree: Switch to new delalloc space reserve and release")
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> [ define the variable instead of repeating the shift ]
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>


diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 63394b450afc..4e3b71ec7492 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1255,6 +1255,7 @@ static int cluster_pages_for_defrag(struct inode *inode,
 	u64 page_start;
 	u64 page_end;
 	u64 page_cnt;
+	u64 start = (u64)start_index << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int ret;
 	int i;
 	int i_done;
@@ -1271,8 +1272,7 @@ static int cluster_pages_for_defrag(struct inode *inode,
 	page_cnt = min_t(u64, (u64)num_pages, (u64)file_end - start_index + 1);
 
 	ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, &data_reserved,
-			start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
-			page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT);
+			start, page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	i_done = 0;
@@ -1361,8 +1361,7 @@ static int cluster_pages_for_defrag(struct inode *inode,
 		btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), 1);
 		spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
 		btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
-				start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				(page_cnt - i_done) << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
+				start, (page_cnt - i_done) << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
 	}
 
 
@@ -1389,8 +1388,7 @@ static int cluster_pages_for_defrag(struct inode *inode,
 		put_page(pages[i]);
 	}
 	btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
-			start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
-			page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
+			start, page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT, true);
 	btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), page_cnt << PAGE_SHIFT);
 	extent_changeset_free(data_reserved);
 	return ret;

Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix potential overflow in cluster_pages_for_defrag on" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:01:21PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:49:26PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > 
> > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> 
> Patch below generated against 5.4.67

Thanks, that worked, also seems to work for 4.19.y