From: Abdifatah Suruur <suruurism@gmail.com>
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, security@kernel.org,
w@1wt.eu, sashal@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] netfilter: nft_byteorder leaks uninitialised kernel stack on 6.12.y with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE (CWE-457)
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:47:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179258686469.28311.5894488032414438351@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atXZxmkU9Yrv4h_b@chamomile>
Hi Pablo,
I am not asking for a CVE for the upstream code, and I am not disputing
that bb061d3 fixes it in 7.1. I have not sent a cve@kernel.org request.
The only reason I mentioned a CVE is that 6.12.y still carries the
pre-bb061d3 multi-register path, and with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE the
marked-but-unwritten destination word is exposed to a later nft load.
That is why I sent the 6.12.y backport rather than a mainline patch. On
the default CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO builds the same oracle reads
zero, so the affected population is narrow.
If you and the CNA consider a stable-only infoleak that is already fixed
upstream not CVE-worthy, I will drop the request. The stable fix is the
part that matters to me. If you do want it tracked, I will follow the
documented process once the patch is queued.
Thanks,
Abdifatah Suruur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <179235055956.10524.6485282696272965887@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <atU2brRgmeb6ght2@1wt.eu>
2026-10-18 22:17 ` [SECURITY] netfilter: nft_byteorder leaks uninitialised kernel stack on 6.12.y with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE (CWE-457) Abdifatah Suruur
2026-10-19 5:48 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-19 6:08 ` Abdifatah Suruur
2026-10-19 6:58 ` Greg KH
2026-10-19 8:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-21 12:47 ` Abdifatah Suruur [this message]
2026-10-23 12:57 ` Greg KH
2026-10-23 14:20 ` Abdifatah Suruur
2026-10-22 4:07 ` Abdifatah Suruur
2026-10-19 20:55 ` Sasha Levin
2026-10-19 21:14 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-21 12:47 ` Abdifatah Suruur
2026-10-22 2:03 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179258686469.28311.5894488032414438351@gmail.com \
--to=suruurism@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox