From: Abdifatah Suruur <suruurism@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] Revert "netfilter: nft_byteorder: remove multi-register support"
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 15:22:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179422697447.5131.3947908931395034167@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179422696909.5131.4005481731765358036@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 3c5fb3a6c8118d15e60295e76fb5b879021eef43.
The upstream change removes multi-register byteorder support and is
tagged stable+noautosel because nftables versions before 1.1.0 can
generate length/size combinations that the removal rejects. Backporting
it to stable can make existing rulesets fail to load.
Restore the multi-register path so stable keeps the old userspace-visible
behaviour, and fix the uninitialised-stack read with a targeted
initialisation in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Abdifatah Suruur <suruurism@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
index 391aade36ef3c..74548b4c114b9 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct nft_byteorder {
u8 sreg;
u8 dreg;
enum nft_byteorder_ops op:8;
+ u8 len;
u8 size;
};
@@ -27,8 +28,13 @@ void nft_byteorder_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
{
const struct nft_byteorder *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
- const u32 *src = ®s->data[priv->sreg];
+ u32 *src = ®s->data[priv->sreg];
u32 *dst = ®s->data[priv->dreg];
+ u16 *s16, *d16;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ s16 = (void *)src;
+ d16 = (void *)dst;
switch (priv->size) {
case 8: {
@@ -37,14 +43,18 @@ void nft_byteorder_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
switch (priv->op) {
case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH:
- src64 = nft_reg_load64(src);
-
- nft_reg_store64(dst64, be64_to_cpu((__force __be64)src64));
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) {
+ src64 = nft_reg_load64(&src[i]);
+ nft_reg_store64(&dst64[i],
+ be64_to_cpu((__force __be64)src64));
+ }
break;
case NFT_BYTEORDER_HTON:
- src64 = (__force __u64)cpu_to_be64(nft_reg_load64(src));
-
- nft_reg_store64(dst64, src64);
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) {
+ src64 = (__force __u64)
+ cpu_to_be64(nft_reg_load64(&src[i]));
+ nft_reg_store64(&dst64[i], src64);
+ }
break;
}
break;
@@ -52,20 +62,24 @@ void nft_byteorder_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
case 4:
switch (priv->op) {
case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH:
- *dst = ntohl((__force __be32)*src);
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 4; i++)
+ dst[i] = ntohl((__force __be32)src[i]);
break;
case NFT_BYTEORDER_HTON:
- *dst = (__force __u32)htonl(*src);
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 4; i++)
+ dst[i] = (__force __u32)htonl(src[i]);
break;
}
break;
case 2:
switch (priv->op) {
case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH:
- nft_reg_store16(dst, ntohs(nft_reg_load_be16(src)));
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 2; i++)
+ d16[i] = ntohs((__force __be16)s16[i]);
break;
case NFT_BYTEORDER_HTON:
- nft_reg_store_be16(dst, htons(nft_reg_load16(src)));
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 2; i++)
+ d16[i] = (__force __u16)htons(s16[i]);
break;
}
break;
@@ -123,22 +137,20 @@ static int nft_byteorder_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
if (err < 0)
return err;
- /* no longer support multi-reg conversions */
- if (len != size)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ priv->len = len;
err = nft_parse_register_load(ctx, tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_SREG], &priv->sreg,
- len);
+ priv->len);
if (err < 0)
return err;
err = nft_parse_register_store(ctx, tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_DREG],
&priv->dreg, NULL, NFT_DATA_VALUE,
- len);
+ priv->len);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- if (nft_reg_overlap(priv->sreg, priv->dreg, len))
+ if (nft_reg_overlap(priv->sreg, priv->dreg, priv->len))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
@@ -155,10 +167,9 @@ static int nft_byteorder_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
goto nla_put_failure;
if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BYTEORDER_OP, htonl(priv->op)))
goto nla_put_failure;
- if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BYTEORDER_SIZE, htonl(priv->size)))
+ if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BYTEORDER_LEN, htonl(priv->len)))
goto nla_put_failure;
- /* compatibility for old userspace which permitted size != len */
- if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BYTEORDER_LEN, htonl(priv->size)))
+ if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFTA_BYTEORDER_SIZE, htonl(priv->size)))
goto nla_put_failure;
return 0;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 12:22 [PATCH 6.12.y 0/2] nft_byteorder: fix the uninitialised-stack read without removing multi-register support Abdifatah Suruur
2026-11-09 12:22 ` Abdifatah Suruur [this message]
2026-11-09 12:25 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] Revert "netfilter: nft_byteorder: remove multi-register support" Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-09 12:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-09 12:48 ` Sasha Levin
2026-11-09 13:18 ` Abdifatah Suruur
2026-11-09 12:22 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/2] netfilter: nft_byteorder: initialise the marked destination span Abdifatah Suruur
2026-11-09 12:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179422697447.5131.3947908931395034167@gmail.com \
--to=suruurism@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox