From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel.send@gmail.com>,
Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pci: disable msi/msix at probe time
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:50:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323185006.GT26935@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426786724-22241-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:57:52PM +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> commit d52877c7b1afb8c37ebe17e2005040b79cb618b0
> pci/irq: let pci_device_shutdown to call pci_msi_shutdown v2
>
> attempted to address the problem of kexec getting
> started after linux enabled msi/msix for a device,
> and drivers being confused by msi being enabled,
> by disabling msi at shutdown.
>
> But arguably, it's better to disable msi/msix when kexec
> starts - for example, kexec might run after a crash (kdump)
> and shutdown callbacks are not always invoked in that case.
>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel.send@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index 3cb2210..2ebd2a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,12 @@ static long local_pci_probe(void *_ddi)
> */
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> pci_dev->driver = pci_drv;
> + /*
> + * When using kexec, msi might be left enabled by the previous kernel,
> + * this breaks things as some drivers assume msi/msi-x is off at boot.
> + * Fix this by forcing msi off at startup.
> + */
> + pci_msi_off(pci_dev);
I think this makes sense, but I have a few questions. This is a device
initialization thing, so it seems like a better fit for the enumeration
path, e.g,. pci_msi_init_pci_dev(), than for the driver binding path.
But when CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y, pci_msi_init_pci_dev() already does basically
the same thing, so we shouldn't need this change unless CONFIG_PCI_MSI is
not set in the kdump kernel.
If this is a problem just with kexeced kernels that don't have
CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y, I think I would prefer to fix this by moving
pci_msi_init_pci_dev() outside the #ifdef so it works regardless of
CONFIG_PCI_MSI. That would also be nice because we could clean up the
duplication between pci_msi_off() and pci_msi_init_pci_dev(). It would
also make the starting machine state less dependent on the new kernel,
which seems like a good thing.
Are there any bugzillas we could reference here?
> rc = pci_drv->probe(pci_dev, ddi->id);
> if (!rc)
> return rc;
> --
> MST
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 18:57 [PATCH v2 0/4] pci: fix unhandled interrupt on shutdown Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-19 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] pci: disable msi/msix at probe time Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-23 18:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-03-23 19:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-23 20:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-23 20:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-19 18:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] pci: don't disable msi/msix at shutdown Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-19 18:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] pci: make msi/msix shutdown functions static Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-19 18:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] virtio_pci: drop msi_off on probe Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-23 4:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] pci: fix unhandled interrupt on shutdown Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150323185006.GT26935@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel.send@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox