* Re: net/xen-netfront patch for stable
[not found] <5615A7CF.1040106@amazon.com>
@ 2015-10-18 0:06 ` Greg KH
2015-10-19 10:53 ` Luis Henriques
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2015-10-18 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamata, Munehisa; +Cc: stable, aliguori, 3chas3
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Kamata, Munehisa wrote:
> Hi stable maintainers,
>
> Could you please consider applying the following patch to stable trees? In particular, I think this is needed for 3.18 or later.
>
> 274b045509175db0405c784be85e8cce116e6f7d net/xen-netfront: only napi_synchronize() if running
>
> Without this commit, we found that a migrated Linux guest could go into an infinite loop at boot. We confirmed that the issue went away with v4.1.6 + the commit.
>
Now applied, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: net/xen-netfront patch for stable
[not found] <5615A7CF.1040106@amazon.com>
2015-10-18 0:06 ` net/xen-netfront patch for stable Greg KH
@ 2015-10-19 10:53 ` Luis Henriques
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luis Henriques @ 2015-10-19 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamata, Munehisa; +Cc: stable, aliguori, 3chas3
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Kamata, Munehisa wrote:
> Hi stable maintainers,
>
> Could you please consider applying the following patch to stable trees? In particular, I think this is needed for 3.18 or later.
>
> 274b045509175db0405c784be85e8cce116e6f7d net/xen-netfront: only napi_synchronize() if running
>
> Without this commit, we found that a migrated Linux guest could go into an infinite loop at boot. We confirmed that the issue went away with v4.1.6 + the commit.
>
Looks like this commit could also be applied to the 3.16 kernel. I'm
queuing it for the next release.
Cheers,
--
Lu�s
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread