Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@siemens.com>,
	bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH STABLE v4.9 01/10] locking: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath()
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:10:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181218221049.6816-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218221049.6816-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 548095dea63ffc016d39c35b32c628d033638aca upstream.

Queued spinlocks are not used by DEC Alpha, and furthermore operations
such as READ_ONCE() and release/relaxed RMW atomics are being changed
to imply smp_read_barrier_depends().  This commit therefore removes the
now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath(),
and adjusts the comments accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index a72f5df643f8d..8710fbe8d26c0 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
  * @tail : The new queue tail code word
  * Return: The previous queue tail code word
  *
- * xchg(lock, tail)
+ * xchg(lock, tail), which heads an address dependency
  *
  * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
  */
@@ -533,13 +533,11 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 	if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
 		prev = decode_tail(old);
 		/*
-		 * The above xchg_tail() is also a load of @lock which generates,
-		 * through decode_tail(), a pointer.
-		 *
-		 * The address dependency matches the RELEASE of xchg_tail()
-		 * such that the access to @prev must happen after.
+		 * The above xchg_tail() is also a load of @lock which
+		 * generates, through decode_tail(), a pointer.  The address
+		 * dependency matches the RELEASE of xchg_tail() such that
+		 * the subsequent access to @prev happens after.
 		 */
-		smp_read_barrier_depends();
 
 		WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
 
-- 
2.20.1

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-18 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-18 22:10 [PATCH STABLE v4.9 00/10] Backport for "cache line starvation on x86 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 02/10] locking/qspinlock: Ensure node is initialised before updating prev->next Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 03/10] locking/qspinlock: Bound spinning on pending->locked transition in slowpath Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 04/10] locking/qspinlock: Merge 'struct __qspinlock' into 'struct qspinlock' Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 05/10] locking/qspinlock: Remove unbounded cmpxchg() loop from locking slowpath Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 06/10] locking/qspinlock: Remove duplicate clear_pending() function from PV code Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 07/10] locking/qspinlock: Kill cmpxchg() loop when claiming lock from head of queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 08/10] locking/qspinlock: Re-order code Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 09/10] locking/qspinlock/x86: Increase _Q_PENDING_LOOPS upper bound Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:10 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 10/10] locking/qspinlock, x86: Provide liveness guarantee Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-18 22:35 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 00/10] Backport for "cache line starvation on x86 Sasha Levin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-13 14:09 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-12-13 14:09 ` [PATCH STABLE v4.9 01/10] locking: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181218221049.6816-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=daniel.wagner@siemens.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox