* [PATCH for v5.5 1/2] Revert "Input: synaptics-rmi4 - don't increment rmiaddr for SMBus transfers"
[not found] <20200115124819.3191024-1-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
@ 2020-01-15 12:48 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-01-17 3:37 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-01-15 12:48 ` [PATCH for v5.5 2/2] Input: rmi_f54: read from FIFO in 32 byte blocks Hans Verkuil
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Verkuil @ 2020-01-15 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-media
Cc: linux-input, Dmitry Torokhov, Timo Kaufmann, Hans Verkuil, stable
This reverts commit a284e11c371e446371675668d8c8120a27227339.
This causes problems (drifting cursor) with at least the F11 function that
reads more than 32 bytes.
The real issue is in the F54 driver, and so this should be fixed there, and
not in rmi_smbus.c.
So first revert this bad commit, then fix the real problem in F54 in another
patch.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Reported-by: Timo Kaufmann <timokau@zoho.com>
Fixes: a284e11c371e ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - don't increment rmiaddr for SMBus transfers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
index b313c579914f..2407ea43de59 100644
--- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static int rmi_smb_write_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
/* prepare to write next block of bytes */
cur_len -= SMB_MAX_COUNT;
databuff += SMB_MAX_COUNT;
+ rmiaddr += SMB_MAX_COUNT;
}
exit:
mutex_unlock(&rmi_smb->page_mutex);
@@ -214,6 +215,7 @@ static int rmi_smb_read_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
/* prepare to read next block of bytes */
cur_len -= SMB_MAX_COUNT;
databuff += SMB_MAX_COUNT;
+ rmiaddr += SMB_MAX_COUNT;
}
retval = 0;
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH for v5.5 2/2] Input: rmi_f54: read from FIFO in 32 byte blocks
[not found] <20200115124819.3191024-1-hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
2020-01-15 12:48 ` [PATCH for v5.5 1/2] Revert "Input: synaptics-rmi4 - don't increment rmiaddr for SMBus transfers" Hans Verkuil
@ 2020-01-15 12:48 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-01-17 4:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Verkuil @ 2020-01-15 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-media
Cc: linux-input, Dmitry Torokhov, Timo Kaufmann, Hans Verkuil, stable
The F54 Report Data is apparently read through a fifo and for
the smbus protocol that means that between reading a block of 32
bytes the rmiaddr shouldn't be incremented. However, changing
that causes other non-fifo reads to fail and so that change was
reverted.
This patch changes just the F54 function and it now reads 32 bytes
at a time from the fifo, using the F54_FIFO_OFFSET to update the
start address that is used when reading from the fifo.
This has only been tested with smbus, not with i2c or spi. But I
suspect that the same is needed there since I think similar
problems will occur there when reading more than 256 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Tested-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Reported-by: Timo Kaufmann <timokau@zoho.com>
Fixes: a284e11c371e ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - don't increment rmiaddr for SMBus transfers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c
index 0bc01cfc2b51..6b23e679606e 100644
--- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c
+++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f54.c
@@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
#define F54_NUM_TX_OFFSET 1
#define F54_NUM_RX_OFFSET 0
+/*
+ * The smbus protocol can read only 32 bytes max at a time.
+ * But this should be fine for i2c/spi as well.
+ */
+#define F54_REPORT_DATA_SIZE 32
+
/* F54 commands */
#define F54_GET_REPORT 1
#define F54_FORCE_CAL 2
@@ -526,6 +532,7 @@ static void rmi_f54_work(struct work_struct *work)
int report_size;
u8 command;
int error;
+ int i;
report_size = rmi_f54_get_report_size(f54);
if (report_size == 0) {
@@ -558,23 +565,27 @@ static void rmi_f54_work(struct work_struct *work)
rmi_dbg(RMI_DEBUG_FN, &fn->dev, "Get report command completed, reading data\n");
- fifo[0] = 0;
- fifo[1] = 0;
- error = rmi_write_block(fn->rmi_dev,
- fn->fd.data_base_addr + F54_FIFO_OFFSET,
- fifo, sizeof(fifo));
- if (error) {
- dev_err(&fn->dev, "Failed to set fifo start offset\n");
- goto abort;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < report_size; i += F54_REPORT_DATA_SIZE) {
+ int size = min(F54_REPORT_DATA_SIZE, report_size - i);
+
+ fifo[0] = i & 0xff;
+ fifo[1] = i >> 8;
+ error = rmi_write_block(fn->rmi_dev,
+ fn->fd.data_base_addr + F54_FIFO_OFFSET,
+ fifo, sizeof(fifo));
+ if (error) {
+ dev_err(&fn->dev, "Failed to set fifo start offset\n");
+ goto abort;
+ }
- error = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev, fn->fd.data_base_addr +
- F54_REPORT_DATA_OFFSET, f54->report_data,
- report_size);
- if (error) {
- dev_err(&fn->dev, "%s: read [%d bytes] returned %d\n",
- __func__, report_size, error);
- goto abort;
+ error = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev, fn->fd.data_base_addr +
+ F54_REPORT_DATA_OFFSET,
+ f54->report_data + i, size);
+ if (error) {
+ dev_err(&fn->dev, "%s: read [%d bytes] returned %d\n",
+ __func__, size, error);
+ goto abort;
+ }
}
abort:
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread