Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 10:59:50AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 02:26:40PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 02:04:21PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 09. 02. 20, 12:33, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree.
> > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> > > >
> > > > From d55966c4279bfc6a0cf0b32bf13f5df228a1eeb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> > > > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:31:05 -0500
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space
> > > 
> > > 5.5.2 was already released with this patch:
> > > commit 165387a9c90152f35976d82feca6eff5f0d5ac02
> > > Author: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> > > Date:   Fri Jan 31 09:31:05 2020 -0500
> > > 
> > >     btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space
> > > 
> > >     commit d55966c4279bfc6a0cf0b32bf13f5df228a1eeb6 upstream.
> > > 
> > > It cannot be applied twice :).
> > 
> > Oops, Sasha beat me too it, sorry for the noise :)
> 
> I've grabbed it for the fixes: tag, sorry :)

Not a problem, much rather see patches try to get applied more than
once, than not at all :)