From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com, wqu@suse.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 14:43:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6540456.ZgMnpaWDUL@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158124801131151@kroah.com>
Dear Greg,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org - 09.02.20, 12:33:31 CET:
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git
> commit id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
I believe you tried to apply it twice, since it is already in 5.5.2.
Best,
Martin
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From d55966c4279bfc6a0cf0b32bf13f5df228a1eeb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:31:05 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available
> space
>
> There was some logic added a while ago to clear out f_bavail in
> statfs() if we did not have enough free metadata space to satisfy our
> global reserve. This was incorrect at the time, however didn't
> really pose a problem for normal file systems because we would often
> allocate chunks if we got this low on free metadata space, and thus
> wouldn't really hit this case unless we were actually full.
>
> Fast forward to today and now we are much better about not allocating
> metadata chunks all of the time. Couple this with d792b0f19711
> ("btrfs: always reserve our entire size for the global reserve")
> which now means we'll easily have a larger global reserve than our
> free space, we are now more likely to trip over this while still
> having plenty of space.
>
> Fix this by skipping this logic if the global rsv's space_info is not
> full. space_info->full is 0 unless we've attempted to allocate a
> chunk for that space_info and that has failed. If this happens then
> the space for the global reserve is definitely sacred and we need to
> report b_avail == 0, but before then we can just use our calculated
> b_avail.
>
> Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
> Fixes: ca8a51b3a979 ("btrfs: statfs: report zero available if metadata
> are exhausted") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5+
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Tested-By: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index a906315efd19..0616a5434793 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -2135,7 +2135,15 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry,
> struct kstatfs *buf) */
> thresh = SZ_4M;
>
> - if (!mixed && total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
> + /*
> + * We only want to claim there's no available space if we can no
> longer + * allocate chunks for our metadata profile and our
global
> reserve will + * not fit in the free metadata space. If we aren't
> ->full then we + * still can allocate chunks and thus are fine using
> the currently + * calculated f_bavail.
> + */
> + if (!mixed && block_rsv->space_info->full &&
> + total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
> buf->f_bavail = 0;
>
> buf->f_type = BTRFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
--
Martin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-09 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-09 11:33 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree gregkh
2020-02-09 13:04 ` Jiri Slaby
2020-02-09 13:26 ` Greg KH
2020-02-09 15:59 ` Sasha Levin
2020-02-09 17:02 ` Greg KH
2020-02-09 13:43 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6540456.ZgMnpaWDUL@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox