Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com, wqu@suse.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 14:43:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6540456.ZgMnpaWDUL@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158124801131151@kroah.com>

Dear Greg,

gregkh@linuxfoundation.org - 09.02.20, 12:33:31 CET:
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git
> commit id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

I believe you tried to apply it twice, since it is already in 5.5.2.

Best,
Martin

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> From d55966c4279bfc6a0cf0b32bf13f5df228a1eeb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:31:05 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available
> space
> 
> There was some logic added a while ago to clear out f_bavail in
> statfs() if we did not have enough free metadata space to satisfy our
> global reserve.  This was incorrect at the time, however didn't
> really pose a problem for normal file systems because we would often
> allocate chunks if we got this low on free metadata space, and thus
> wouldn't really hit this case unless we were actually full.
> 
> Fast forward to today and now we are much better about not allocating
> metadata chunks all of the time.  Couple this with d792b0f19711
> ("btrfs: always reserve our entire size for the global reserve")
> which now means we'll easily have a larger global reserve than our
> free space, we are now more likely to trip over this while still
> having plenty of space.
> 
> Fix this by skipping this logic if the global rsv's space_info is not
> full.  space_info->full is 0 unless we've attempted to allocate a
> chunk for that space_info and that has failed.  If this happens then
> the space for the global reserve is definitely sacred and we need to
> report b_avail == 0, but before then we can just use our calculated
> b_avail.
> 
> Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
> Fixes: ca8a51b3a979 ("btrfs: statfs: report zero available if metadata
> are exhausted") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5+
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Tested-By: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index a906315efd19..0616a5434793 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -2135,7 +2135,15 @@ static int btrfs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry,
> struct kstatfs *buf) */
>  	thresh = SZ_4M;
> 
> -	if (!mixed && total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
> +	/*
> +	 * We only want to claim there's no available space if we can no
> longer +	 * allocate chunks for our metadata profile and our 
global
> reserve will +	 * not fit in the free metadata space.  If we aren't
> ->full then we +	 * still can allocate chunks and thus are fine using
> the currently +	 * calculated f_bavail.
> +	 */
> +	if (!mixed && block_rsv->space_info->full &&
> +	    total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
>  		buf->f_bavail = 0;
> 
>  	buf->f_type = BTRFS_SUPER_MAGIC;


-- 
Martin



      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-09 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-09 11:33 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: do not zero f_bavail if we have available space" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree gregkh
2020-02-09 13:04 ` Jiri Slaby
2020-02-09 13:26   ` Greg KH
2020-02-09 15:59     ` Sasha Levin
2020-02-09 17:02       ` Greg KH
2020-02-09 13:43 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6540456.ZgMnpaWDUL@merkaba \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox