From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
Cc: agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:23:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320212301.GD1434@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320065932.28116-1-youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:59:32PM +0900, Yeongjin Gil wrote:
> In verity_end_io(), if bi_status is not BLK_STS_OK, it can be return
> directly. But if FEC configured, it is desired to correct the data page
> through verity_verify_io. And the return value will be converted to
> blk_status and passed to verity_finish_io().
>
> BTW, when a bit is set in v->validated_blocks, verity_verify_io() skips
> verification regardless of I/O error for the corresponding bio. In this
> case, the I/O error could not be returned properly, and as a result,
> there is a problem that abnormal data could be read for the
> corresponding block.
>
> To fix this problem, when an I/O error occurs, do not skip verification
> even if the bit related is set in v->validated_blocks.
>
> Fixes: 843f38d382b1 ("dm verity: add 'check_at_most_once' option to only validate hashes once")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
> ---
> v2:
> -change commit message and tag
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> index ade83ef3b439..9316399b920e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int verity_verify_io(struct dm_verity_io *io)
> sector_t cur_block = io->block + b;
> struct ahash_request *req = verity_io_hash_req(v, io);
>
> - if (v->validated_blocks &&
> + if (v->validated_blocks && bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK &&
> likely(test_bit(cur_block, v->validated_blocks))) {
> verity_bv_skip_block(v, io, iter);
> continue;
> --
Looks good now, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-20 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20230320070011epcas1p12f0fe9f9f417dd1a3441efdde55a4132@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-03-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC Yeongjin Gil
2023-03-20 21:23 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
[not found] <CGME20230515011922epcas1p3b2e3748b9953d9c6c5d36a0f059d92f9@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2023-05-07 13:23 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree gregkh
2023-05-15 1:19 ` [PATCH v2] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC Yeongjin Gil
[not found] <CGME20230515011855epcas1p325968c8eaf11fdabd7a41996df8abc6f@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2023-05-07 13:23 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree gregkh
2023-05-15 1:18 ` [PATCH v2] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC Yeongjin Gil
[not found] <CGME20230515011823epcas1p2e05135dda9e7e159d637016d81d55abc@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2023-05-07 13:48 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2023-05-15 1:18 ` [PATCH v2] dm verity: fix error handling for check_at_most_once on FEC Yeongjin Gil
2023-05-15 3:51 ` Greg KH
2023-05-15 4:06 ` Yeongjin Gil
2023-05-15 4:18 ` 'Greg KH'
[not found] <CGME20230320065416epcas1p2511cb60bfb14ed2048e5d39677490c78@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2023-03-20 6:54 ` Yeongjin Gil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230320212301.GD1434@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=youngjin.gil@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox