* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: Use io_schedule* in cqring wait" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
@ 2023-07-16 8:41 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2023-07-16 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andres, asml.silence, axboe; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 8a796565cec3601071cbbd27d6304e202019d014
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023071622-exhale-throwing-6c38@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
8a796565cec3 ("io_uring: Use io_schedule* in cqring wait")
d33a39e57768 ("io_uring: keep timeout in io_wait_queue")
46ae7eef44f6 ("io_uring: optimise non-timeout waiting")
846072f16eed ("io_uring: mimimise io_cqring_wait_schedule")
3fcf19d592d5 ("io_uring: parse check_cq out of wq waiting")
12521a5d5cb7 ("io_uring: fix CQ waiting timeout handling")
52ea806ad983 ("io_uring: finish waiting before flushing overflow entries")
35d90f95cfa7 ("io_uring: include task_work run after scheduling in wait for events")
1b346e4aa8e7 ("io_uring: don't check overflow flush failures")
a85381d8326d ("io_uring: skip overflow CQE posting for dying ring")
c0e0d6ba25f1 ("io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN")
b4c98d59a787 ("io_uring: introduce io_has_work")
78a861b94959 ("io_uring: add sync cancelation API through io_uring_register()")
c34398a8c018 ("io_uring: remove __io_req_task_work_add")
ed5ccb3beeba ("io_uring: remove priority tw list optimisation")
4a0fef62788b ("io_uring: optimize io_uring_task layout")
253993210bd8 ("io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting")
305bef988708 ("io_uring: hide eventfd assumptions in eventfd paths")
affa87db9010 ("io_uring: fix multi ctx cancellation")
d9dee4302a7c ("io_uring: remove ->flush_cqes optimisation")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 8a796565cec3601071cbbd27d6304e202019d014 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 09:20:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: Use io_schedule* in cqring wait
I observed poor performance of io_uring compared to synchronous IO. That
turns out to be caused by deeper CPU idle states entered with io_uring,
due to io_uring using plain schedule(), whereas synchronous IO uses
io_schedule().
The losses due to this are substantial. On my cascade lake workstation,
t/io_uring from the fio repository e.g. yields regressions between 20%
and 40% with the following command:
./t/io_uring -r 5 -X0 -d 1 -s 1 -c 1 -p 0 -S$use_sync -R 0 /mnt/t2/fio/write.0.0
This is repeatable with different filesystems, using raw block devices
and using different block devices.
Use io_schedule_prepare() / io_schedule_finish() in
io_cqring_wait_schedule() to address the difference.
After that using io_uring is on par or surpassing synchronous IO (using
registered files etc makes it reliably win, but arguably is a less fair
comparison).
There are other calls to schedule() in io_uring/, but none immediately
jump out to be similarly situated, so I did not touch them. Similarly,
it's possible that mutex_lock_io() should be used, but it's not clear if
there are cases where that matters.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707162007.194068-1-andres@anarazel.de
[axboe: minor style fixup]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index e8096d502a7c..7505de2428e0 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -2489,6 +2489,8 @@ int io_run_task_work_sig(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
{
+ int token, ret;
+
if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(ctx->check_cq)))
return 1;
if (unlikely(!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist)))
@@ -2499,11 +2501,20 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
return -EINTR;
if (unlikely(io_should_wake(iowq)))
return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Use io_schedule_prepare/finish, so cpufreq can take into account
+ * that the task is waiting for IO - turns out to be important for low
+ * QD IO.
+ */
+ token = io_schedule_prepare();
+ ret = 0;
if (iowq->timeout == KTIME_MAX)
schedule();
else if (!schedule_hrtimeout(&iowq->timeout, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS))
- return -ETIME;
- return 0;
+ ret = -ETIME;
+ io_schedule_finish(token);
+ return ret;
}
/*
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-07-16 8:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-16 8:41 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: Use io_schedule* in cqring wait" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox