Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y
@ 2023-08-20 19:16 Qais Yousef
  2023-08-20 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: unlink misfit task from cpu overutilized Qais Yousef
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qais Yousef @ 2023-08-20 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Dietmar Eggemann,
	linux-kernel, Qais Yousef

Decoupling misfit from overutilized better helps handling misfit due to
uclamp_min only being misfit without triggering overutilized state, which is
bad from energy point of view as it prematurely disables energy aware
scheduling.

The series also makes the search for a better CPU under bad thermal condition
more comprehensive, which is useful improvement when the system is under bad
thermal condition.

Backports to 5.10.y and 5.15.y is hard as find_energy_efficient_cpu() is
different. But it applies cleanly on 6.1.y

Compile tested against various randconfigs for different archs.

Boot tested on android14-6.1 GKI kernel.

Based on v6.1.46

Original series

	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230201143628.270912-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/

Thanks!

--
Qais Yousef

Vincent Guittot (2):
  sched/fair: unlink misfit task from cpu overutilized
  sched/fair: Remove capacity inversion detection

 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  19 -----
 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: unlink misfit task from cpu overutilized
  2023-08-20 19:16 [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y Qais Yousef
@ 2023-08-20 19:16 ` Qais Yousef
  2023-08-20 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Remove capacity inversion detection Qais Yousef
  2023-08-21 13:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y Greg KH
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qais Yousef @ 2023-08-20 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Dietmar Eggemann,
	linux-kernel, Qais Yousef, Kajetan Puchalski

From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

commit e5ed0550c04c5469ecdc1634d8aa18c8609590f0 upstream.

By taking into account uclamp_min, the 1:1 relation between task misfit
and cpu overutilized is no more true as a task with a small util_avg may
not fit a high capacity cpu because of uclamp_min constraint.

Add a new state in util_fits_cpu() to reflect the case that task would fit
a CPU except for the uclamp_min hint which is a performance requirement.

Use -1 to reflect that a CPU doesn't fit only because of uclamp_min so we
can use this new value to take additional action to select the best CPU
that doesn't match uclamp_min hint.

When util_fits_cpu() returns -1, we will continue to look for a possible
CPU with better performance, which replaces Capacity Inversion detection
with capacity_orig_of() - thermal_load_avg to detect a capacity inversion.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230201143628.270912-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
(cherry picked from commit e5ed0550c04c5469ecdc1634d8aa18c8609590f0)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5e5aea2360a8..a45ccee98ab1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4549,8 +4549,8 @@ static inline int util_fits_cpu(unsigned long util,
 	 * handle the case uclamp_min > uclamp_max.
 	 */
 	uclamp_min = min(uclamp_min, uclamp_max);
-	if (util < uclamp_min && capacity_orig != SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
-		fits = fits && (uclamp_min <= capacity_orig_thermal);
+	if (fits && (util < uclamp_min) && (uclamp_min > capacity_orig_thermal))
+		return -1;
 
 	return fits;
 }
@@ -4560,7 +4560,11 @@ static inline int task_fits_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
 	unsigned long uclamp_min = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN);
 	unsigned long uclamp_max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
 	unsigned long util = task_util_est(p);
-	return util_fits_cpu(util, uclamp_min, uclamp_max, cpu);
+	/*
+	 * Return true only if the cpu fully fits the task requirements, which
+	 * include the utilization but also the performance hints.
+	 */
+	return (util_fits_cpu(util, uclamp_min, uclamp_max, cpu) > 0);
 }
 
 static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
@@ -6043,6 +6047,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_overutilized(int cpu)
 	unsigned long rq_util_min = uclamp_rq_get(cpu_rq(cpu), UCLAMP_MIN);
 	unsigned long rq_util_max = uclamp_rq_get(cpu_rq(cpu), UCLAMP_MAX);
 
+	/* Return true only if the utilization doesn't fit CPU's capacity */
 	return !util_fits_cpu(cpu_util_cfs(cpu), rq_util_min, rq_util_max, cpu);
 }
 
@@ -6836,6 +6841,7 @@ static int
 select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
 	unsigned long task_util, util_min, util_max, best_cap = 0;
+	int fits, best_fits = 0;
 	int cpu, best_cpu = -1;
 	struct cpumask *cpus;
 
@@ -6851,12 +6857,28 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 
 		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu) && !sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
 			continue;
-		if (util_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, cpu))
+
+		fits = util_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, cpu);
+
+		/* This CPU fits with all requirements */
+		if (fits > 0)
 			return cpu;
+		/*
+		 * Only the min performance hint (i.e. uclamp_min) doesn't fit.
+		 * Look for the CPU with best capacity.
+		 */
+		else if (fits < 0)
+			cpu_cap = capacity_orig_of(cpu) - thermal_load_avg(cpu_rq(cpu));
 
-		if (cpu_cap > best_cap) {
+		/*
+		 * First, select CPU which fits better (-1 being better than 0).
+		 * Then, select the one with best capacity at same level.
+		 */
+		if ((fits < best_fits) ||
+		    ((fits == best_fits) && (cpu_cap > best_cap))) {
 			best_cap = cpu_cap;
 			best_cpu = cpu;
+			best_fits = fits;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -6869,7 +6891,11 @@ static inline bool asym_fits_cpu(unsigned long util,
 				 int cpu)
 {
 	if (sched_asym_cpucap_active())
-		return util_fits_cpu(util, util_min, util_max, cpu);
+		/*
+		 * Return true only if the cpu fully fits the task requirements
+		 * which include the utilization and the performance hints.
+		 */
+		return (util_fits_cpu(util, util_min, util_max, cpu) > 0);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -7236,6 +7262,9 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 	unsigned long p_util_max = uclamp_is_used() ? uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX) : 1024;
 	struct root_domain *rd = this_rq()->rd;
 	int cpu, best_energy_cpu, target = -1;
+	int prev_fits = -1, best_fits = -1;
+	unsigned long best_thermal_cap = 0;
+	unsigned long prev_thermal_cap = 0;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 	struct perf_domain *pd;
 	struct energy_env eenv;
@@ -7271,6 +7300,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 		unsigned long prev_spare_cap = 0;
 		int max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
 		unsigned long base_energy;
+		int fits, max_fits = -1;
 
 		cpumask_and(cpus, perf_domain_span(pd), cpu_online_mask);
 
@@ -7320,7 +7350,9 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 				util_min = max(rq_util_min, p_util_min);
 				util_max = max(rq_util_max, p_util_max);
 			}
-			if (!util_fits_cpu(util, util_min, util_max, cpu))
+
+			fits = util_fits_cpu(util, util_min, util_max, cpu);
+			if (!fits)
 				continue;
 
 			lsub_positive(&cpu_cap, util);
@@ -7328,7 +7360,9 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 			if (cpu == prev_cpu) {
 				/* Always use prev_cpu as a candidate. */
 				prev_spare_cap = cpu_cap;
-			} else if (cpu_cap > max_spare_cap) {
+				prev_fits = fits;
+			} else if ((fits > max_fits) ||
+				   ((fits == max_fits) && (cpu_cap > max_spare_cap))) {
 				/*
 				 * Find the CPU with the maximum spare capacity
 				 * among the remaining CPUs in the performance
@@ -7336,6 +7370,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 				 */
 				max_spare_cap = cpu_cap;
 				max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu;
+				max_fits = fits;
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -7354,26 +7389,50 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
 			if (prev_delta < base_energy)
 				goto unlock;
 			prev_delta -= base_energy;
+			prev_thermal_cap = cpu_thermal_cap;
 			best_delta = min(best_delta, prev_delta);
 		}
 
 		/* Evaluate the energy impact of using max_spare_cap_cpu. */
 		if (max_spare_cap_cpu >= 0 && max_spare_cap > prev_spare_cap) {
+			/* Current best energy cpu fits better */
+			if (max_fits < best_fits)
+				continue;
+
+			/*
+			 * Both don't fit performance hint (i.e. uclamp_min)
+			 * but best energy cpu has better capacity.
+			 */
+			if ((max_fits < 0) &&
+			    (cpu_thermal_cap <= best_thermal_cap))
+				continue;
+
 			cur_delta = compute_energy(&eenv, pd, cpus, p,
 						   max_spare_cap_cpu);
 			/* CPU utilization has changed */
 			if (cur_delta < base_energy)
 				goto unlock;
 			cur_delta -= base_energy;
-			if (cur_delta < best_delta) {
-				best_delta = cur_delta;
-				best_energy_cpu = max_spare_cap_cpu;
-			}
+
+			/*
+			 * Both fit for the task but best energy cpu has lower
+			 * energy impact.
+			 */
+			if ((max_fits > 0) && (best_fits > 0) &&
+			    (cur_delta >= best_delta))
+				continue;
+
+			best_delta = cur_delta;
+			best_energy_cpu = max_spare_cap_cpu;
+			best_fits = max_fits;
+			best_thermal_cap = cpu_thermal_cap;
 		}
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	if (best_delta < prev_delta)
+	if ((best_fits > prev_fits) ||
+	    ((best_fits > 0) && (best_delta < prev_delta)) ||
+	    ((best_fits < 0) && (best_thermal_cap > prev_thermal_cap)))
 		target = best_energy_cpu;
 
 	return target;
@@ -10183,24 +10242,23 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
 	 */
 	update_sd_lb_stats(env, &sds);
 
-	if (sched_energy_enabled()) {
-		struct root_domain *rd = env->dst_rq->rd;
-
-		if (rcu_dereference(rd->pd) && !READ_ONCE(rd->overutilized))
-			goto out_balanced;
-	}
-
-	local = &sds.local_stat;
-	busiest = &sds.busiest_stat;
-
 	/* There is no busy sibling group to pull tasks from */
 	if (!sds.busiest)
 		goto out_balanced;
 
+	busiest = &sds.busiest_stat;
+
 	/* Misfit tasks should be dealt with regardless of the avg load */
 	if (busiest->group_type == group_misfit_task)
 		goto force_balance;
 
+	if (sched_energy_enabled()) {
+		struct root_domain *rd = env->dst_rq->rd;
+
+		if (rcu_dereference(rd->pd) && !READ_ONCE(rd->overutilized))
+			goto out_balanced;
+	}
+
 	/* ASYM feature bypasses nice load balance check */
 	if (busiest->group_type == group_asym_packing)
 		goto force_balance;
@@ -10213,6 +10271,7 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
 	if (busiest->group_type == group_imbalanced)
 		goto force_balance;
 
+	local = &sds.local_stat;
 	/*
 	 * If the local group is busier than the selected busiest group
 	 * don't try and pull any tasks.
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Remove capacity inversion detection
  2023-08-20 19:16 [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y Qais Yousef
  2023-08-20 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: unlink misfit task from cpu overutilized Qais Yousef
@ 2023-08-20 19:16 ` Qais Yousef
  2023-08-21 13:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y Greg KH
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qais Yousef @ 2023-08-20 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Dietmar Eggemann,
	linux-kernel, Qais Yousef

From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

commit a2e90611b9f425adbbfcdaa5b5e49958ddf6f61b upstream.

Remove the capacity inversion detection which is now handled by
util_fits_cpu() returning -1 when we need to continue to look for a
potential CPU with better performance.

This ends up almost reverting patches below except for some comments:
commit da07d2f9c153 ("sched/fair: Fixes for capacity inversion detection")
commit aa69c36f31aa ("sched/fair: Consider capacity inversion in util_fits_cpu()")
commit 44c7b80bffc3 ("sched/fair: Detect capacity inversion")

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230201143628.270912-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
(cherry picked from commit a2e90611b9f425adbbfcdaa5b5e49958ddf6f61b)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 84 +++-----------------------------------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h | 19 ----------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a45ccee98ab1..612873ec2197 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4464,17 +4464,9 @@ static inline int util_fits_cpu(unsigned long util,
 	 *
 	 * For uclamp_max, we can tolerate a drop in performance level as the
 	 * goal is to cap the task. So it's okay if it's getting less.
-	 *
-	 * In case of capacity inversion we should honour the inverted capacity
-	 * for both uclamp_min and uclamp_max all the time.
 	 */
-	capacity_orig = cpu_in_capacity_inversion(cpu);
-	if (capacity_orig) {
-		capacity_orig_thermal = capacity_orig;
-	} else {
-		capacity_orig = capacity_orig_of(cpu);
-		capacity_orig_thermal = capacity_orig - arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpu);
-	}
+	capacity_orig = capacity_orig_of(cpu);
+	capacity_orig_thermal = capacity_orig - arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * We want to force a task to fit a cpu as implied by uclamp_max.
@@ -8929,82 +8921,16 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
 
 static void update_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
 {
-	unsigned long capacity_orig = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
 	unsigned long capacity = scale_rt_capacity(cpu);
 	struct sched_group *sdg = sd->groups;
-	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
-	rq->cpu_capacity_orig = capacity_orig;
+	cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_capacity_orig = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
 
 	if (!capacity)
 		capacity = 1;
 
-	rq->cpu_capacity = capacity;
-
-	/*
-	 * Detect if the performance domain is in capacity inversion state.
-	 *
-	 * Capacity inversion happens when another perf domain with equal or
-	 * lower capacity_orig_of() ends up having higher capacity than this
-	 * domain after subtracting thermal pressure.
-	 *
-	 * We only take into account thermal pressure in this detection as it's
-	 * the only metric that actually results in *real* reduction of
-	 * capacity due to performance points (OPPs) being dropped/become
-	 * unreachable due to thermal throttling.
-	 *
-	 * We assume:
-	 *   * That all cpus in a perf domain have the same capacity_orig
-	 *     (same uArch).
-	 *   * Thermal pressure will impact all cpus in this perf domain
-	 *     equally.
-	 */
-	if (sched_energy_enabled()) {
-		unsigned long inv_cap = capacity_orig - thermal_load_avg(rq);
-		struct perf_domain *pd;
-
-		rcu_read_lock();
-
-		pd = rcu_dereference(rq->rd->pd);
-		rq->cpu_capacity_inverted = 0;
-
-		for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
-			struct cpumask *pd_span = perf_domain_span(pd);
-			unsigned long pd_cap_orig, pd_cap;
-
-			/* We can't be inverted against our own pd */
-			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_of(rq), pd_span))
-				continue;
-
-			cpu = cpumask_any(pd_span);
-			pd_cap_orig = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
-
-			if (capacity_orig < pd_cap_orig)
-				continue;
-
-			/*
-			 * handle the case of multiple perf domains have the
-			 * same capacity_orig but one of them is under higher
-			 * thermal pressure. We record it as capacity
-			 * inversion.
-			 */
-			if (capacity_orig == pd_cap_orig) {
-				pd_cap = pd_cap_orig - thermal_load_avg(cpu_rq(cpu));
-
-				if (pd_cap > inv_cap) {
-					rq->cpu_capacity_inverted = inv_cap;
-					break;
-				}
-			} else if (pd_cap_orig > inv_cap) {
-				rq->cpu_capacity_inverted = inv_cap;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-	}
-
-	trace_sched_cpu_capacity_tp(rq);
+	cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_capacity = capacity;
+	trace_sched_cpu_capacity_tp(cpu_rq(cpu));
 
 	sdg->sgc->capacity = capacity;
 	sdg->sgc->min_capacity = capacity;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 5f18460f62f0..d6d488e8eb55 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1041,7 +1041,6 @@ struct rq {
 
 	unsigned long		cpu_capacity;
 	unsigned long		cpu_capacity_orig;
-	unsigned long		cpu_capacity_inverted;
 
 	struct balance_callback *balance_callback;
 
@@ -2879,24 +2878,6 @@ static inline unsigned long capacity_orig_of(int cpu)
 	return cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_capacity_orig;
 }
 
-/*
- * Returns inverted capacity if the CPU is in capacity inversion state.
- * 0 otherwise.
- *
- * Capacity inversion detection only considers thermal impact where actual
- * performance points (OPPs) gets dropped.
- *
- * Capacity inversion state happens when another performance domain that has
- * equal or lower capacity_orig_of() becomes effectively larger than the perf
- * domain this CPU belongs to due to thermal pressure throttling it hard.
- *
- * See comment in update_cpu_capacity().
- */
-static inline unsigned long cpu_in_capacity_inversion(int cpu)
-{
-	return cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_capacity_inverted;
-}
-
 /**
  * enum cpu_util_type - CPU utilization type
  * @FREQUENCY_UTIL:	Utilization used to select frequency
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y
  2023-08-20 19:16 [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y Qais Yousef
  2023-08-20 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: unlink misfit task from cpu overutilized Qais Yousef
  2023-08-20 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Remove capacity inversion detection Qais Yousef
@ 2023-08-21 13:09 ` Greg KH
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2023-08-21 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qais Yousef
  Cc: stable, Vincent Guittot, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
	Dietmar Eggemann, linux-kernel

On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 08:16:48PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> Decoupling misfit from overutilized better helps handling misfit due to
> uclamp_min only being misfit without triggering overutilized state, which is
> bad from energy point of view as it prematurely disables energy aware
> scheduling.
> 
> The series also makes the search for a better CPU under bad thermal condition
> more comprehensive, which is useful improvement when the system is under bad
> thermal condition.
> 
> Backports to 5.10.y and 5.15.y is hard as find_energy_efficient_cpu() is
> different. But it applies cleanly on 6.1.y
> 
> Compile tested against various randconfigs for different archs.
> 
> Boot tested on android14-6.1 GKI kernel.
> 
> Based on v6.1.46
> 
> Original series
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230201143628.270912-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/
> 
> Thanks!

Both now queued up, thanks!

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-21 13:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-20 19:16 [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y Qais Yousef
2023-08-20 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: unlink misfit task from cpu overutilized Qais Yousef
2023-08-20 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Remove capacity inversion detection Qais Yousef
2023-08-21 13:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] Backport unlink misfit patches into 6.1.y Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox