[PATCH v4] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[PATCH v4] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and
hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the
VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to
extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can
modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source
of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND.

If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole
is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources,
but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic.
This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as
after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more
theoretical.

So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this
fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without
RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot.

This patch is deliberately written to be "just a CoCo x86 driver
feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and
platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and
add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any
driver can call this with seed data of any quality, or even garbage
quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or
have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to
build something into the core of the RNG, this patch interprets the
particular CoCo issue as just a CoCo issue, and therefore separates this
all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code.

Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
Changes v3->v4:
- Add stable@ tag and reviewed-by lines.
- Add comment for Dave explaining where the "32" comes from.

 arch/x86/coco/core.c        | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
index eeec9986570e..0e988bff4aec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
@@ -3,13 +3,16 @@
  * Confidential Computing Platform Capability checks
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
  *
  * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
  */
 
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
 
+#include <asm/archrandom.h>
 #include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
@@ -153,3 +156,40 @@ __init void cc_set_mask(u64 mask)
 {
 	cc_mask = mask;
 }
+
+__init void cc_random_init(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The seed is 32 bytes (in units of longs), which is 256 bits, which
+	 * is the security level that the RNG is targeting.
+	 */
+	unsigned long rng_seed[32 / sizeof(long)];
+	size_t i, longs;
+
+	if (cc_vendor == CC_VENDOR_NONE)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since the CoCo threat model includes the host, the only reliable
+	 * source of entropy that can be neither observed nor manipulated is
+	 * RDRAND. Usually, RDRAND failure is considered tolerable, but since
+	 * CoCo guests have no other unobservable source of entropy, it's
+	 * important to at least ensure the RNG gets some initial random seeds.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed); i += longs) {
+		longs = arch_get_random_longs(&rng_seed[i], ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed) - i);
+
+		/*
+		 * A zero return value means that the guest doesn't have RDRAND
+		 * or the CPU is physically broken, and in both cases that
+		 * means most crypto inside of the CoCo instance will be
+		 * broken, defeating the purpose of CoCo in the first place. So
+		 * just panic here because it's absolutely unsafe to continue
+		 * executing.
+		 */
+		if (longs == 0)
+			panic("RDRAND is defective.");
+	}
+	add_device_randomness(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+	memzero_explicit(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
index 76c310b19b11..e9d059449885 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ extern enum cc_vendor cc_vendor;
 void cc_set_mask(u64 mask);
 u64 cc_mkenc(u64 val);
 u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val);
+void cc_random_init(void);
 #else
 #define cc_vendor (CC_VENDOR_NONE)
 
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static inline u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val)
 {
 	return val;
 }
+static inline void cc_random_init(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_COCO_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 84201071dfac..30a653cfc7d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <asm/bios_ebda.h>
 #include <asm/bugs.h>
 #include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
+#include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/efi.h>
 #include <asm/gart.h>
@@ -994,6 +995,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * memory size.
 	 */
 	mem_encrypt_setup_arch();
+	cc_random_init();
 
 	efi_fake_memmap();
 	efi_find_mirror();
-- 
2.43.2

Re: [PATCH v4] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Tom Lendacky]

On 2/21/24 20:05, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and
> hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the
> VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to
> extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can
> modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source
> of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND.
> 
> If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole
> is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources,
> but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic.
> This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as
> after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more
> theoretical.
> 
> So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this
> fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without
> RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot.
> 
> This patch is deliberately written to be "just a CoCo x86 driver
> feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and
> platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and
> add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any
> driver can call this with seed data of any quality, or even garbage
> quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or
> have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to
> build something into the core of the RNG, this patch interprets the
> particular CoCo issue as just a CoCo issue, and therefore separates this
> all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code.
> 
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> ---
> Changes v3->v4:
> - Add stable@ tag and reviewed-by lines.
> - Add comment for Dave explaining where the "32" comes from.
> 
>   arch/x86/coco/core.c        | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h |  2 ++
>   arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     |  2 ++
>   3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
> index eeec9986570e..0e988bff4aec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
> @@ -3,13 +3,16 @@
>    * Confidential Computing Platform Capability checks
>    *
>    * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
>    *
>    * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>    */
>   
>   #include <linux/export.h>
>   #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/random.h>
>   
> +#include <asm/archrandom.h>
>   #include <asm/coco.h>
>   #include <asm/processor.h>
>   
> @@ -153,3 +156,40 @@ __init void cc_set_mask(u64 mask)
>   {
>   	cc_mask = mask;
>   }
> +
> +__init void cc_random_init(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * The seed is 32 bytes (in units of longs), which is 256 bits, which
> +	 * is the security level that the RNG is targeting.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long rng_seed[32 / sizeof(long)];
> +	size_t i, longs;
> +
> +	if (cc_vendor == CC_VENDOR_NONE)

I responded to an earlier version of this patch, adding that response here:

You probably want to use:

     if (!cc_platform_has(CC_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
         return;

Otherwise, you can hit the bare-metal case where AMD SME is active and 
then cc_vendor will not be CC_VENDOR_NONE.

Thanks,
Tom

> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since the CoCo threat model includes the host, the only reliable
> +	 * source of entropy that can be neither observed nor manipulated is
> +	 * RDRAND. Usually, RDRAND failure is considered tolerable, but since
> +	 * CoCo guests have no other unobservable source of entropy, it's
> +	 * important to at least ensure the RNG gets some initial random seeds.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed); i += longs) {
> +		longs = arch_get_random_longs(&rng_seed[i], ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed) - i);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * A zero return value means that the guest doesn't have RDRAND
> +		 * or the CPU is physically broken, and in both cases that
> +		 * means most crypto inside of the CoCo instance will be
> +		 * broken, defeating the purpose of CoCo in the first place. So
> +		 * just panic here because it's absolutely unsafe to continue
> +		 * executing.
> +		 */
> +		if (longs == 0)
> +			panic("RDRAND is defective.");
> +	}
> +	add_device_randomness(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
> +	memzero_explicit(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
> index 76c310b19b11..e9d059449885 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ extern enum cc_vendor cc_vendor;
>   void cc_set_mask(u64 mask);
>   u64 cc_mkenc(u64 val);
>   u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val);
> +void cc_random_init(void);
>   #else
>   #define cc_vendor (CC_VENDOR_NONE)
>   
> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static inline u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val)
>   {
>   	return val;
>   }
> +static inline void cc_random_init(void) { }
>   #endif
>   
>   #endif /* _ASM_X86_COCO_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 84201071dfac..30a653cfc7d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>   #include <asm/bios_ebda.h>
>   #include <asm/bugs.h>
>   #include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
> +#include <asm/coco.h>
>   #include <asm/cpu.h>
>   #include <asm/efi.h>
>   #include <asm/gart.h>
> @@ -994,6 +995,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>   	 * memory size.
>   	 */
>   	mem_encrypt_setup_arch();
> +	cc_random_init();
>   
>   	efi_fake_memmap();
>   	efi_find_mirror();

Re: [PATCH v4] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

Hi Tom,

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:05 PM Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/21/24 20:05, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > +
> > +     if (cc_vendor == CC_VENDOR_NONE)
>
> I responded to an earlier version of this patch, adding that response here:
>
> You probably want to use:
>
>      if (!cc_platform_has(CC_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>          return;
>
> Otherwise, you can hit the bare-metal case where AMD SME is active and
> then cc_vendor will not be CC_VENDOR_NONE.

Nice catch, thanks. I'll do that for v+1.


Jason

[PATCH v5] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and
hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the
VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to
extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can
modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source
of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND.

If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole
is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources,
but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic.
This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as
after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more
theoretical.

So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this
fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without
RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot.

This patch is deliberately written to be "just a CoCo x86 driver
feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and
platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and
add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any
driver can call this with seed data of any quality, or even garbage
quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or
have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to
build something into the core of the RNG, this patch interprets the
particular CoCo issue as just a CoCo issue, and therefore separates this
all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code.

Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
Changes v4->v5:
- Use `cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT)` instead of checking
  cc_vendor, per Tom's recommendation.

 arch/x86/coco/core.c        | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
index eeec9986570e..b419a29ef0e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
@@ -3,13 +3,16 @@
  * Confidential Computing Platform Capability checks
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
  *
  * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
  */
 
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
 
+#include <asm/archrandom.h>
 #include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
@@ -153,3 +156,40 @@ __init void cc_set_mask(u64 mask)
 {
 	cc_mask = mask;
 }
+
+__init void cc_random_init(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The seed is 32 bytes (in units of longs), which is 256 bits, which
+	 * is the security level that the RNG is targeting.
+	 */
+	unsigned long rng_seed[32 / sizeof(long)];
+	size_t i, longs;
+
+	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since the CoCo threat model includes the host, the only reliable
+	 * source of entropy that can be neither observed nor manipulated is
+	 * RDRAND. Usually, RDRAND failure is considered tolerable, but since
+	 * CoCo guests have no other unobservable source of entropy, it's
+	 * important to at least ensure the RNG gets some initial random seeds.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed); i += longs) {
+		longs = arch_get_random_longs(&rng_seed[i], ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed) - i);
+
+		/*
+		 * A zero return value means that the guest doesn't have RDRAND
+		 * or the CPU is physically broken, and in both cases that
+		 * means most crypto inside of the CoCo instance will be
+		 * broken, defeating the purpose of CoCo in the first place. So
+		 * just panic here because it's absolutely unsafe to continue
+		 * executing.
+		 */
+		if (longs == 0)
+			panic("RDRAND is defective.");
+	}
+	add_device_randomness(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+	memzero_explicit(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
index 76c310b19b11..e9d059449885 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ extern enum cc_vendor cc_vendor;
 void cc_set_mask(u64 mask);
 u64 cc_mkenc(u64 val);
 u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val);
+void cc_random_init(void);
 #else
 #define cc_vendor (CC_VENDOR_NONE)
 
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static inline u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val)
 {
 	return val;
 }
+static inline void cc_random_init(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_COCO_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 84201071dfac..30a653cfc7d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <asm/bios_ebda.h>
 #include <asm/bugs.h>
 #include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
+#include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/efi.h>
 #include <asm/gart.h>
@@ -994,6 +995,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * memory size.
 	 */
 	mem_encrypt_setup_arch();
+	cc_random_init();
 
 	efi_fake_memmap();
 	efi_find_mirror();
-- 
2.43.2

Re: [PATCH v5] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

Hi Borislav,

On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 02:18:56AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and
> hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the
> VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to
> extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can
> modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source
> of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND.
> 
> If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole
> is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources,
> but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic.
> This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as
> after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more
> theoretical.
> 
> So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this
> fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without
> RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot.
> 
> This patch is deliberately written to be "just a CoCo x86 driver
> feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and
> platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and
> add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any
> driver can call this with seed data of any quality, or even garbage
> quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or
> have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to
> build something into the core of the RNG, this patch interprets the
> particular CoCo issue as just a CoCo issue, and therefore separates this
> all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code.
> 
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>

This has been sitting on the list for a while with a few positive
reviews and no outstanding objections, afaict. Can you merge this to
tip?

Thanks,
Jason

Re: [PATCH v5] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Borislav Petkov]

Hi Jason,

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:34:03AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> This has been sitting on the list for a while with a few positive
> reviews and no outstanding objections, afaict. Can you merge this to
> tip?

the tip tree is open for new code after the merge window is over.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Re: [PATCH v5] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Borislav Petkov]

On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 02:18:56AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> +__init void cc_random_init(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * The seed is 32 bytes (in units of longs), which is 256 bits, which
> +	 * is the security level that the RNG is targeting.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long rng_seed[32 / sizeof(long)];
> +	size_t i, longs;
> +
> +	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Since the CoCo threat model includes the host, the only reliable
> +	 * source of entropy that can be neither observed nor manipulated is
> +	 * RDRAND. Usually, RDRAND failure is considered tolerable, but since
> +	 * CoCo guests have no other unobservable source of entropy, it's
> +	 * important to at least ensure the RNG gets some initial random seeds.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed); i += longs) {
> +		longs = arch_get_random_longs(&rng_seed[i], ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed) - i);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * A zero return value means that the guest doesn't have RDRAND
> +		 * or the CPU is physically broken, and in both cases that
> +		 * means most crypto inside of the CoCo instance will be
> +		 * broken, defeating the purpose of CoCo in the first place. So
> +		 * just panic here because it's absolutely unsafe to continue
> +		 * executing.
> +		 */
> +		if (longs == 0)
> +			panic("RDRAND is defective.");
> +	}
> +	add_device_randomness(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
> +	memzero_explicit(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));

Please redo your patch ontop of latest tip/master:

arch/x86/coco/core.c: In function ‘cc_random_init’:
arch/x86/coco/core.c:189:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘memzero_explicit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  189 |         memzero_explicit(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: arch/x86/coco/core.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: arch/x86/coco] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: arch/x86] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [/mnt/kernel/kernel/2nd/linux/Makefile:1919: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

[PATCH v6] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and
hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the
VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to
extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can
modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source
of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND.

If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole
is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources,
but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic.
This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as
after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more
theoretical.

So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this
fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without
RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot.

This patch is deliberately written to be "just a CoCo x86 driver
feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and
platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and
add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any
driver can call this with seed data of any quality, or even garbage
quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or
have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to
build something into the core of the RNG, this patch interprets the
particular CoCo issue as just a CoCo issue, and therefore separates this
all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code.

Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
Changes v5->v6:
- Rebase on tip/master.
- Add string.h include.

 arch/x86/coco/core.c        | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
index d07be9d05cd0..ddd4efdc79d6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
@@ -3,13 +3,17 @@
  * Confidential Computing Platform Capability checks
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
  *
  * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
  */
 
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
 
+#include <asm/archrandom.h>
 #include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
@@ -148,3 +152,40 @@ u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val)
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cc_mkdec);
+
+__init void cc_random_init(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The seed is 32 bytes (in units of longs), which is 256 bits, which
+	 * is the security level that the RNG is targeting.
+	 */
+	unsigned long rng_seed[32 / sizeof(long)];
+	size_t i, longs;
+
+	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since the CoCo threat model includes the host, the only reliable
+	 * source of entropy that can be neither observed nor manipulated is
+	 * RDRAND. Usually, RDRAND failure is considered tolerable, but since
+	 * CoCo guests have no other unobservable source of entropy, it's
+	 * important to at least ensure the RNG gets some initial random seeds.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed); i += longs) {
+		longs = arch_get_random_longs(&rng_seed[i], ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed) - i);
+
+		/*
+		 * A zero return value means that the guest doesn't have RDRAND
+		 * or the CPU is physically broken, and in both cases that
+		 * means most crypto inside of the CoCo instance will be
+		 * broken, defeating the purpose of CoCo in the first place. So
+		 * just panic here because it's absolutely unsafe to continue
+		 * executing.
+		 */
+		if (longs == 0)
+			panic("RDRAND is defective.");
+	}
+	add_device_randomness(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+	memzero_explicit(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
index fb7388bbc212..c086699b0d0c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static inline void cc_set_mask(u64 mask)
 
 u64 cc_mkenc(u64 val);
 u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val);
+void cc_random_init(void);
 #else
 #define cc_vendor (CC_VENDOR_NONE)
 
@@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ static inline u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val)
 {
 	return val;
 }
+static inline void cc_random_init(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_COCO_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index f04cef846e51..e3f01caf104b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include <asm/bios_ebda.h>
 #include <asm/bugs.h>
 #include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
+#include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/efi.h>
 #include <asm/gart.h>
@@ -993,6 +994,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * memory size.
 	 */
 	mem_encrypt_setup_arch();
+	cc_random_init();
 
 	efi_fake_memmap();
 	efi_find_mirror();
-- 
2.44.0

Re: [PATCH v6] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[Tom Lendacky]

On 3/26/24 11:07, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and
> hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the
> VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to
> extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can
> modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source
> of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND.
> 
> If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole
> is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources,
> but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic.
> This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as
> after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more
> theoretical.
> 
> So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this
> fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without
> RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot.
> 
> This patch is deliberately written to be "just a CoCo x86 driver
> feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and
> platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and
> add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any
> driver can call this with seed data of any quality, or even garbage
> quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or
> have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to
> build something into the core of the RNG, this patch interprets the
> particular CoCo issue as just a CoCo issue, and therefore separates this
> all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code.
> 
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>

Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

> ---
> Changes v5->v6:
> - Rebase on tip/master.
> - Add string.h include.
> 
>   arch/x86/coco/core.c        | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h |  2 ++
>   arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     |  2 ++
>   3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 

[tip: x86/urgent] x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

[tip-bot2 for Jason A. Donenfeld]

The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     99485c4c026f024e7cb82da84c7951dbe3deb584
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/99485c4c026f024e7cb82da84c7951dbe3deb584
Author:        Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:07:35 +01:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
CommitterDate: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:40:19 +02:00

x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems

There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and
hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the
VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to
extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can
modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source
of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND.

If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole
is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources,
but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic.
This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as
after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more
theoretical.

So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this
fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without
RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot.

Add this deliberately to be "just a CoCo x86 driver feature" and not
part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and platforms have some
desire to contribute something to the RNG, and add_device_randomness()
is specifically meant for this purpose.

Any driver can call it with seed data of any quality, or even garbage
quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or
have no effect, but can never make it worse.

Rather than trying to build something into the core of the RNG, consider
the particular CoCo issue just a CoCo issue, and therefore separate it
all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code.

  [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240326160735.73531-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
---
 arch/x86/coco/core.c        | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h |  2 ++-
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     |  2 ++-
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
index d07be9d..ddd4efd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/core.c
@@ -3,13 +3,17 @@
  * Confidential Computing Platform Capability checks
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>. All Rights Reserved.
  *
  * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
  */
 
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
 
+#include <asm/archrandom.h>
 #include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
@@ -148,3 +152,40 @@ u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val)
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cc_mkdec);
+
+__init void cc_random_init(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The seed is 32 bytes (in units of longs), which is 256 bits, which
+	 * is the security level that the RNG is targeting.
+	 */
+	unsigned long rng_seed[32 / sizeof(long)];
+	size_t i, longs;
+
+	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since the CoCo threat model includes the host, the only reliable
+	 * source of entropy that can be neither observed nor manipulated is
+	 * RDRAND. Usually, RDRAND failure is considered tolerable, but since
+	 * CoCo guests have no other unobservable source of entropy, it's
+	 * important to at least ensure the RNG gets some initial random seeds.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed); i += longs) {
+		longs = arch_get_random_longs(&rng_seed[i], ARRAY_SIZE(rng_seed) - i);
+
+		/*
+		 * A zero return value means that the guest doesn't have RDRAND
+		 * or the CPU is physically broken, and in both cases that
+		 * means most crypto inside of the CoCo instance will be
+		 * broken, defeating the purpose of CoCo in the first place. So
+		 * just panic here because it's absolutely unsafe to continue
+		 * executing.
+		 */
+		if (longs == 0)
+			panic("RDRAND is defective.");
+	}
+	add_device_randomness(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+	memzero_explicit(rng_seed, sizeof(rng_seed));
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
index fb7388b..c086699 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static inline void cc_set_mask(u64 mask)
 
 u64 cc_mkenc(u64 val);
 u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val);
+void cc_random_init(void);
 #else
 #define cc_vendor (CC_VENDOR_NONE)
 
@@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ static inline u64 cc_mkdec(u64 val)
 {
 	return val;
 }
+static inline void cc_random_init(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_COCO_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 0109e6c..e125e05 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <asm/bios_ebda.h>
 #include <asm/bugs.h>
 #include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
+#include <asm/coco.h>
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/efi.h>
 #include <asm/gart.h>
@@ -991,6 +992,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * memory size.
 	 */
 	mem_encrypt_setup_arch();
+	cc_random_init();
 
 	efi_fake_memmap();
 	efi_find_mirror();