[merged mm-hotfixes-stable] mm-hugetlb-do-not-call-vma_add_reservation-upon-enomem.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-hotfixes-stable] mm-hugetlb-do-not-call-vma_add_reservation-upon-enomem.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/hugetlb: do not call vma_add_reservation upon ENOMEM
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-hugetlb-do-not-call-vma_add_reservation-upon-enomem.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: mm/hugetlb: do not call vma_add_reservation upon ENOMEM
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 22:53:23 +0200

sysbot reported a splat [1] on __unmap_hugepage_range().  This is because
vma_needs_reservation() can return -ENOMEM if
allocate_file_region_entries() fails to allocate the file_region struct
for the reservation.

Check for that and do not call vma_add_reservation() if that is the case,
otherwise region_abort() and region_del() will see that we do not have any
file_regions.

If we detect that vma_needs_reservation() returned -ENOMEM, we clear the
hugetlb_restore_reserve flag as if this reservation was still consumed, so
free_huge_folio() will not increment the resv count.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/0000000000004096100617c58d54@google.com/T/#ma5983bc1ab18a54910da83416b3f89f3c7ee43aa

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240528205323.20439-1-osalvador@suse.de
Fixes: df7a6d1f6405 ("mm/hugetlb: restore the reservation if needed")
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+d3fe2dc5ffe9380b714b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/0000000000004096100617c58d54@google.com/
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-do-not-call-vma_add_reservation-upon-enomem
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5768,8 +5768,20 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g
 		 * do_exit() will not see it, and will keep the reservation
 		 * forever.
 		 */
-		if (adjust_reservation && vma_needs_reservation(h, vma, address))
-			vma_add_reservation(h, vma, address);
+		if (adjust_reservation) {
+			int rc = vma_needs_reservation(h, vma, address);
+
+			if (rc < 0)
+				/* Pressumably allocate_file_region_entries failed
+				 * to allocate a file_region struct. Clear
+				 * hugetlb_restore_reserve so that global reserve
+				 * count will not be incremented by free_huge_folio.
+				 * Act as if we consumed the reservation.
+				 */
+				folio_clear_hugetlb_restore_reserve(page_folio(page));
+			else if (rc)
+				vma_add_reservation(h, vma, address);
+		}
 
 		tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, huge_page_size(h));
 		/*
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from osalvador@suse.de are

mm-hugetlb-drop-node_alloc_noretry-from-alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio.patch
arch-x86-do-not-explicitly-clear-reserved-flag-in-free_pagetable.patch