* Candidates for stable v6.9..v6.10-rc1 Deadlock
@ 2024-06-03 20:48 Ronnie Sahlberg
2024-06-19 12:05 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2024-06-03 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
These commits reference Deadlock between v6.9 and v6.10-rc1
These commits are not, yet, in stable/linux-rolling-stable.
Let me know if you would rather me compare to a different repo/branch.
The list has been manually pruned to only contain commits that look like
actual issues.
If they contain a Fixes line it has been verified that at least one of the
commits that the Fixes tag(s) reference is in stable/linux-rolling-stable
56c35f43eef013579c76
eec7620800081e27dbf8
4268254a39484fc11ba9
0a46ef234756dca04623
ecf0b2b8a37c84641866
e03a5d3e95f22d15d8df
4d3421e04c5dc38baf15
9cc6290991e6cfc9a644
77e619a82fc384ae3d1d
e533e4c62e9993e62e94
21ad2d03641ae70a7acd
2afd5276d314d775ae0b
3bdb7f161697e2d5123b
6f31d6b643a32cc126cf
--
Ronnie Sahlberg [Principal Software Engineer, Linux]
P 775 384 8203 | E [email] | W ciq.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Candidates for stable v6.9..v6.10-rc1 Deadlock
2024-06-03 20:48 Candidates for stable v6.9..v6.10-rc1 Deadlock Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2024-06-19 12:05 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2024-06-19 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: stable
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:48:56PM -0400, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> These commits reference Deadlock between v6.9 and v6.10-rc1
>
> These commits are not, yet, in stable/linux-rolling-stable.
> Let me know if you would rather me compare to a different repo/branch.
> The list has been manually pruned to only contain commits that look like
> actual issues.
> If they contain a Fixes line it has been verified that at least one of the
> commits that the Fixes tag(s) reference is in stable/linux-rolling-stable
>
>
> 56c35f43eef013579c76
> eec7620800081e27dbf8
> 4268254a39484fc11ba9
> 0a46ef234756dca04623
> ecf0b2b8a37c84641866
> e03a5d3e95f22d15d8df
> 4d3421e04c5dc38baf15
> 9cc6290991e6cfc9a644
> 77e619a82fc384ae3d1d
I just grabbed one of these at random, and this commit message says:
This patch brings no functional change.
and in reading it, it's just a "let's quiet the tools for now, but
really, all is good". So that's not something we should be applying,
right?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-19 12:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-03 20:48 Candidates for stable v6.9..v6.10-rc1 Deadlock Ronnie Sahlberg
2024-06-19 12:05 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox