* [PATCH] spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses
@ 2024-10-24 14:56 Hardik Gohil
2024-11-10 4:56 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Gohil @ 2024-10-24 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: broonie, linux-spi, u.kleine-koenig, Hardik Gohil
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6098475d4cb48d821bdf453c61118c56e26294f0 ]
Currently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new
devices so that we can check that we're not trying to reuse a chip
select that's already controlled. This means that if the SPI device is
itself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI
devices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate
those devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller
and hence already holding the global spi_add_lock. Since we only care
about concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per
controller, avoiding the deadlock.
This can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hardik Gohil <hgohil@mvista.com>
---
This fix was not backported to v5.4 and 5.10
Along with this fix please also apply this fix on top of this
spi: fix use-after-free of the add_lock mutex
commit 6c53b45c71b4920b5e62f0ea8079a1da382b9434 upstream.
Commit 6098475d4cb4 ("spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on
SPI buses") introduced a per-controller mutex. But mutex_unlock() of
said lock is called after the controller is already freed:
drivers/spi/spi.c | 15 +++++----------
include/linux/spi/spi.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 0f9410e..58f1947 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -472,12 +472,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(spi_controller_list);
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(board_lock);
-/*
- * Prevents addition of devices with same chip select and
- * addition of devices below an unregistering controller.
- */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(spi_add_lock);
-
/**
* spi_alloc_device - Allocate a new SPI device
* @ctlr: Controller to which device is connected
@@ -580,7 +574,7 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
* chipselect **BEFORE** we call setup(), else we'll trash
* its configuration. Lock against concurrent add() calls.
*/
- mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&ctlr->add_lock);
status = bus_for_each_dev(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi, spi_dev_check);
if (status) {
@@ -624,7 +618,7 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
}
done:
- mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctlr->add_lock);
return status;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_add_device);
@@ -2512,6 +2506,7 @@ int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
spin_lock_init(&ctlr->bus_lock_spinlock);
mutex_init(&ctlr->bus_lock_mutex);
mutex_init(&ctlr->io_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&ctlr->add_lock);
ctlr->bus_lock_flag = 0;
init_completion(&ctlr->xfer_completion);
if (!ctlr->max_dma_len)
@@ -2657,7 +2652,7 @@ void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
/* Prevent addition of new devices, unregister existing ones */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_DYNAMIC))
- mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&ctlr->add_lock);
device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister);
@@ -2688,7 +2683,7 @@ void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
mutex_unlock(&board_lock);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_DYNAMIC))
- mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctlr->add_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_unregister_controller);
diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
index ca39b33..1b9cb90 100644
--- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
+++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
@@ -483,6 +483,9 @@ struct spi_controller {
/* I/O mutex */
struct mutex io_mutex;
+ /* Used to avoid adding the same CS twice */
+ struct mutex add_lock;
+
/* lock and mutex for SPI bus locking */
spinlock_t bus_lock_spinlock;
struct mutex bus_lock_mutex;
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses
2024-10-24 14:56 [PATCH] spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses Hardik Gohil
@ 2024-11-10 4:56 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2024-11-10 4:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hardik Gohil; +Cc: stable, broonie, linux-spi, u.kleine-koenig
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 08:26:11PM +0530, Hardik Gohil wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 6098475d4cb48d821bdf453c61118c56e26294f0 ]
>
> Currently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new
> devices so that we can check that we're not trying to reuse a chip
> select that's already controlled. This means that if the SPI device is
> itself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI
> devices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate
> those devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller
> and hence already holding the global spi_add_lock. Since we only care
> about concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per
> controller, avoiding the deadlock.
>
> This can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.
>
> Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hardik Gohil <hgohil@mvista.com>
> ---
> This fix was not backported to v5.4 and 5.10
>
> Along with this fix please also apply this fix on top of this
>
> spi: fix use-after-free of the add_lock mutex
> commit 6c53b45c71b4920b5e62f0ea8079a1da382b9434 upstream.
>
> Commit 6098475d4cb4 ("spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on
> SPI buses") introduced a per-controller mutex. But mutex_unlock() of
> said lock is called after the controller is already freed:
Now both queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-10 4:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-24 14:56 [PATCH] spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses Hardik Gohil
2024-11-10 4:56 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox