FAILED: patch "[PATCH] perf/x86: Fix low freqency setting issue" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] perf/x86: Fix low freqency setting issue" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 88ec7eedbbd21cad38707620ad6c48a4e9a87c18
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030425-steadfast-claw-1e0b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 88ec7eedbbd21cad38707620ad6c48a4e9a87c18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 07:19:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix low freqency setting issue

Perf doesn't work at low frequencies:

  $ perf record -e cpu_core/instructions/ppp -F 120
  Error:
  The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
  for event (cpu_core/instructions/ppp).
  "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.

The limit_period() check avoids a low sampling period on a counter. It
doesn't intend to limit the frequency.

The check in the x86_pmu_hw_config() should be limited to non-freq mode.
The attr.sample_period and attr.sample_freq are union. The
attr.sample_period should not be used to indicate the frequency mode.

Fixes: c46e665f0377 ("perf/x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250117151913.3043942-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250115154949.3147-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com/

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 8f218ac0d445..2092d615333d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type == event->pmu->type)
 		event->hw.config |= x86_pmu_get_event_config(event);
 
-	if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+	if (!event->attr.freq && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
 		s64 left = event->attr.sample_period;
 		x86_pmu.limit_period(event, &left);
 		if (left > event->attr.sample_period)