FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86: Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting IRQ bypass" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86: Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting IRQ bypass" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f1fb088d9cecde5c3066d8ff8846789667519b7d
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025042805-occupier-decibel-a03d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From f1fb088d9cecde5c3066d8ff8846789667519b7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 12:38:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting IRQ bypass
 producer

Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting an IRQ bypass producer to ensure
irqfd->producer isn't modified while kvm_irq_routing_update() is running.
The only lock held when a producer is added/removed is irqbypass's mutex.

Fixes: 872768800652 ("KVM: x86: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20250404193923.1413163-5-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9c98b77b7dc1..a6829a370e6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -13561,15 +13561,22 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 {
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+	struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
 	int ret;
 
-	irqfd->producer = prod;
 	kvm_arch_start_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+	irqfd->producer = prod;
+
 	ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm,
 					   prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1);
 	if (ret)
 		kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
 
+	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -13579,9 +13586,9 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	int ret;
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+	struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
 
 	WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != prod);
-	irqfd->producer = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * When producer of consumer is unregistered, we change back to
@@ -13589,12 +13596,18 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	 * when the irq is masked/disabled or the consumer side (KVM
 	 * int this case doesn't want to receive the interrupts.
 	*/
+	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+	irqfd->producer = NULL;
+
 	ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm,
 					   prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "irq bypass consumer (token %p) unregistration"
 		       " fails: %d\n", irqfd->consumer.token, ret);
 
+	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
+
 	kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
 }