FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/khugepaged: fix the address passed to notifier on testing" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/khugepaged: fix the address passed to notifier on testing" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 394bfac1c7f7b701c2c93834c5761b9c9ceeebcf
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025091344-pronounce-zoning-2e65@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 394bfac1c7f7b701c2c93834c5761b9c9ceeebcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 06:33:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] mm/khugepaged: fix the address passed to notifier on testing
 young

Commit 8ee53820edfd ("thp: mmu_notifier_test_young") introduced
mmu_notifier_test_young(), but we are passing the wrong address.
In xxx_scan_pmd(), the actual iteration address is "_address" not
"address".  We seem to misuse the variable on the very beginning.

Change it to the right one.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org fix whitespace, per everyone]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250822063318.11644-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Fixes: 8ee53820edfd ("thp: mmu_notifier_test_young")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 6b40bdfd224c..b486c1d19b2d 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1417,8 +1417,8 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		 */
 		if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
 		    (pte_young(pteval) || folio_test_young(folio) ||
-		     folio_test_referenced(folio) || mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm,
-								     address)))
+		     folio_test_referenced(folio) ||
+		     mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm, _address)))
 			referenced++;
 	}
 	if (!writable) {

[PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] mm/khugepaged: convert hpage_collapse_scan_pmd() to use folios

[Sasha Levin]

From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 5c07ebb372d66423e508ecfb8e00324f8797f072 ]

Replaces 5 calls to compound_head(), and removes 1385 bytes of kernel
text.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231020183331.10770-3-vishal.moola@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Stable-dep-of: 394bfac1c7f7 ("mm/khugepaged: fix the address passed to notifier on testing young")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/khugepaged.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index eb46acfd3d205..0c8e87ded1d4d 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1140,6 +1140,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	int result = SCAN_FAIL, referenced = 0;
 	int none_or_zero = 0, shared = 0;
 	struct page *page = NULL;
+	struct folio *folio = NULL;
 	unsigned long _address;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, unmapped = 0;
@@ -1221,29 +1222,28 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			}
 		}
 
-		page = compound_head(page);
-
+		folio = page_folio(page);
 		/*
 		 * Record which node the original page is from and save this
 		 * information to cc->node_load[].
 		 * Khugepaged will allocate hugepage from the node has the max
 		 * hit record.
 		 */
-		node = page_to_nid(page);
+		node = folio_nid(folio);
 		if (hpage_collapse_scan_abort(node, cc)) {
 			result = SCAN_SCAN_ABORT;
 			goto out_unmap;
 		}
 		cc->node_load[node]++;
-		if (!PageLRU(page)) {
+		if (!folio_test_lru(folio)) {
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_LRU;
 			goto out_unmap;
 		}
-		if (PageLocked(page)) {
+		if (folio_test_locked(folio)) {
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_LOCK;
 			goto out_unmap;
 		}
-		if (!PageAnon(page)) {
+		if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_ANON;
 			goto out_unmap;
 		}
@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		 * has excessive GUP pins (i.e. 512).  Anyway the same check
 		 * will be done again later the risk seems low.
 		 */
-		if (!is_refcount_suitable(page)) {
+		if (!is_refcount_suitable(&folio->page)) {
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
 			goto out_unmap;
 		}
@@ -1275,8 +1275,8 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		 * enough young pte to justify collapsing the page
 		 */
 		if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
-		    (pte_young(pteval) || page_is_young(page) ||
-		     PageReferenced(page) || mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm,
+		    (pte_young(pteval) || folio_test_young(folio) ||
+		     folio_test_referenced(folio) || mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm,
 								     address)))
 			referenced++;
 	}
@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		*mmap_locked = false;
 	}
 out:
-	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, page, writable, referenced,
+	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, &folio->page, writable, referenced,
 				     none_or_zero, result, unmapped);
 	return result;
 }
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] mm/khugepaged: fix the address passed to notifier on testing young

[Sasha Levin]

From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 394bfac1c7f7b701c2c93834c5761b9c9ceeebcf ]

Commit 8ee53820edfd ("thp: mmu_notifier_test_young") introduced
mmu_notifier_test_young(), but we are passing the wrong address.
In xxx_scan_pmd(), the actual iteration address is "_address" not
"address".  We seem to misuse the variable on the very beginning.

Change it to the right one.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org fix whitespace, per everyone]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250822063318.11644-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Fixes: 8ee53820edfd ("thp: mmu_notifier_test_young")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/khugepaged.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 0c8e87ded1d4d..ded9a00b20b58 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1276,8 +1276,8 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		 */
 		if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
 		    (pte_young(pteval) || folio_test_young(folio) ||
-		     folio_test_referenced(folio) || mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm,
-								     address)))
+		     folio_test_referenced(folio) ||
+		     mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm, _address)))
 			referenced++;
 	}
 	if (!writable) {
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] mm/khugepaged: fix the address passed to notifier on testing young

[Wei Yang]

On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 03:03:37PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>
>[ Upstream commit 394bfac1c7f7b701c2c93834c5761b9c9ceeebcf ]
>
>Commit 8ee53820edfd ("thp: mmu_notifier_test_young") introduced
>mmu_notifier_test_young(), but we are passing the wrong address.
>In xxx_scan_pmd(), the actual iteration address is "_address" not
>"address".  We seem to misuse the variable on the very beginning.
>
>Change it to the right one.
>

Thanks :-)


-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me