[failures] hugetlbfs-skip-vmas-without-shareable-locks-in-hugetlb_vmdelete_list.patch removed from -mm tree

[failures] hugetlbfs-skip-vmas-without-shareable-locks-in-hugetlb_vmdelete_list.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2845 bytes --]


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     hugetlbfs-skip-vmas-without-shareable-locks-in-hugetlb_vmdelete_list.patch

This patch was dropped because it had testing failures

------------------------------------------------------
From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
Subject: hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 20:19:32 +0530

hugetlb_vmdelete_list() uses trylock to acquire VMA locks during truncate
operations.  As per the original design in commit 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb:
use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization"), if the trylock fails
or the VMA has no lock, it should skip that VMA.  Any remaining mapped
pages are handled by remove_inode_hugepages() which is called after
hugetlb_vmdelete_list() and uses proper lock ordering to guarantee
unmapping success.

Currently, when hugetlb_vma_trylock_write() returns success (1) for VMAs
without shareable locks, the code proceeds to call unmap_hugepage_range().
This causes assertion failures in huge_pmd_unshare() →
hugetlb_vma_assert_locked() because no lock is actually held:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6594 Comm: syz.0.28 Not tainted
  Call Trace:
   hugetlb_vma_assert_locked+0x1dd/0x250
   huge_pmd_unshare+0x2c8/0x540
   __unmap_hugepage_range+0x6e3/0x1aa0
   unmap_hugepage_range+0x32e/0x410
   hugetlb_vmdelete_list+0x189/0x1f0

Fix by explicitly skipping VMAs without shareable locks after trylock
succeeds, consistent with the original design where such VMAs are deferred
to remove_inode_hugepages() for proper handling.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250925144934.150299-1-kartikey406@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f26d7c75c26ec19790e7
Fixes: 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization")
Tested-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c~hugetlbfs-skip-vmas-without-shareable-locks-in-hugetlb_vmdelete_list
+++ a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -487,7 +487,8 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cac
 
 		if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma))
 			continue;
-
+		if (!__vma_shareable_lock(vma))
+			continue;
 		v_start = vma_offset_start(vma, start);
 		v_end = vma_offset_end(vma, end);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from kartikey406@gmail.com are