* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: debug: always unmask interrupts in el0_softstp()" failed to apply to 6.17-stable tree
@ 2025-10-20 8:10 gregkh
2025-10-20 10:18 ` [PATCH 6.17.y] arm64: debug: always unmask interrupts in el0_softstp() Ada Couprie Diaz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2025-10-20 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ada.coupriediaz, catalin.marinas, mark.rutland, stable; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.17-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.17.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x ea0d55ae4b3207c33691a73da3443b1fd379f1d2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025102040-gopher-dipping-a96a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.17.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ea0d55ae4b3207c33691a73da3443b1fd379f1d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:25:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: debug: always unmask interrupts in el0_softstp()
We intend that EL0 exception handlers unmask all DAIF exceptions
before calling exit_to_user_mode().
When completing single-step of a suspended breakpoint, we do not call
local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX) before calling exit_to_user_mode(),
leaving all DAIF exceptions masked.
When pseudo-NMIs are not in use this is benign.
When pseudo-NMIs are in use, this is unsound. At this point interrupts
are masked by both DAIF.IF and PMR_EL1, and subsequent irq flag
manipulation may not work correctly. For example, a subsequent
local_irq_enable() within exit_to_user_mode_loop() will only unmask
interrupts via PMR_EL1 (leaving those masked via DAIF.IF), and
anything depending on interrupts being unmasked (e.g. delivery of
signals) will not work correctly.
This was detected by CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING.
Move the call to `try_step_suspended_breakpoints()` outside of the check
so that interrupts can be unmasked even if we don't call the step handler.
Fixes: 0ac7584c08ce ("arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.17
Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: added Mark's rewritten commit log and some whitespace]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
index f546a914f041..a9c81715ce59 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
@@ -697,6 +697,8 @@ static void noinstr el0_breakpt(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
static void noinstr el0_softstp(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
{
+ bool step_done;
+
if (!is_ttbr0_addr(regs->pc))
arm64_apply_bp_hardening();
@@ -707,10 +709,10 @@ static void noinstr el0_softstp(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
* If we are stepping a suspended breakpoint there's nothing more to do:
* the single-step is complete.
*/
- if (!try_step_suspended_breakpoints(regs)) {
- local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX);
+ step_done = try_step_suspended_breakpoints(regs);
+ local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX);
+ if (!step_done)
do_el0_softstep(esr, regs);
- }
arm64_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6.17.y] arm64: debug: always unmask interrupts in el0_softstp()
2025-10-20 8:10 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: debug: always unmask interrupts in el0_softstp()" failed to apply to 6.17-stable tree gregkh
@ 2025-10-20 10:18 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ada Couprie Diaz @ 2025-10-20 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas
We intend that EL0 exception handlers unmask all DAIF exceptions
before calling exit_to_user_mode().
When completing single-step of a suspended breakpoint, we do not call
local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX) before calling exit_to_user_mode(),
leaving all DAIF exceptions masked.
When pseudo-NMIs are not in use this is benign.
When pseudo-NMIs are in use, this is unsound. At this point interrupts
are masked by both DAIF.IF and PMR_EL1, and subsequent irq flag
manipulation may not work correctly. For example, a subsequent
local_irq_enable() within exit_to_user_mode_loop() will only unmask
interrupts via PMR_EL1 (leaving those masked via DAIF.IF), and
anything depending on interrupts being unmasked (e.g. delivery of
signals) will not work correctly.
This was detected by CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING.
Move the call to `try_step_suspended_breakpoints()` outside of the check
so that interrupts can be unmasked even if we don't call the step handler.
Fixes: 0ac7584c08ce ("arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.17
Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: added Mark's rewritten commit log and some whitespace]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
(cherry picked from commit ea0d55ae4b3207c33691a73da3443b1fd379f1d2)
[ada.coupriediaz@arm.com: Fix conflict for v6.17 stable]
Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
index 2b0c5925502e..db116a62ac95 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
@@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ static void noinstr el0_breakpt(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
static void noinstr el0_softstp(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
{
+ bool step_done;
+
if (!is_ttbr0_addr(regs->pc))
arm64_apply_bp_hardening();
@@ -842,10 +844,10 @@ static void noinstr el0_softstp(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
* If we are stepping a suspended breakpoint there's nothing more to do:
* the single-step is complete.
*/
- if (!try_step_suspended_breakpoints(regs)) {
- local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX);
+ step_done = try_step_suspended_breakpoints(regs);
+ local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX);
+ if (!step_done)
do_el0_softstep(esr, regs);
- }
exit_to_user_mode(regs);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-20 10:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-20 8:10 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: debug: always unmask interrupts in el0_softstp()" failed to apply to 6.17-stable tree gregkh
2025-10-20 10:18 ` [PATCH 6.17.y] arm64: debug: always unmask interrupts in el0_softstp() Ada Couprie Diaz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox