public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 2/4] PM: EM: Slightly reduce em_check_capacity_update() overhead
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:22:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251021192225.2899605-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021192225.2899605-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit a8e62726ac0dd7b610c87ba1a938a5a9091c34df ]

Every iteration of the loop over all possible CPUs in
em_check_capacity_update() causes get_cpu_device() to be called twice
for the same CPU, once indirectly via em_cpu_get() and once directly.

Get rid of the indirect get_cpu_device() call by moving the direct
invocation of it earlier and using em_pd_get() instead of em_cpu_get()
to get a pd pointer for the dev one returned by it.

This also exposes the fact that dev is needed to get a pd, so the code
becomes somewhat easier to follow after it.

No functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1925950.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net
Stable-dep-of: 1ebe8f7e7825 ("PM: EM: Fix late boot with holes in CPU topology")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index 8ee72c6c1daf3..a035b030ff734 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -769,7 +769,8 @@ static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
 		}
 		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 
-		pd = em_cpu_get(cpu);
+		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+		pd = em_pd_get(dev);
 		if (!pd || em_is_artificial(pd))
 			continue;
 
@@ -793,7 +794,6 @@ static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
 		pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n",
 			 cpu, cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
 
-		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 		em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd);
 	}
 
-- 
2.51.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-21 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16 12:51 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] PM: EM: Fix late boot with holes in CPU topology" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-10-21 19:22 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/4] PM: EM: Drop unused parameter from em_adjust_new_capacity() Sasha Levin
2025-10-21 19:22   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-10-21 19:22   ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/4] PM: EM: Move CPU capacity check to em_adjust_new_capacity() Sasha Levin
2025-10-21 19:22   ` [PATCH 6.12.y 4/4] PM: EM: Fix late boot with holes in CPU topology Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251021192225.2899605-2-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox