public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 3/4] PM: EM: Move CPU capacity check to em_adjust_new_capacity()
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:22:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251021192225.2899605-3-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021192225.2899605-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 3e3ba654d3097e0031f2add215b12ff81c23814e ]

Move the check of the CPU capacity currently stored in the energy model
against the arch_scale_cpu_capacity() value to em_adjust_new_capacity()
so it will be done regardless of where the latter is called from.

This will be useful when a new em_adjust_new_capacity() caller is added
subsequently.

While at it, move the pd local variable declaration in
em_check_capacity_update() into the loop in which it is used.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Tested-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/7810787.EvYhyI6sBW@rjwysocki.net
Stable-dep-of: 1ebe8f7e7825 ("PM: EM: Fix late boot with holes in CPU topology")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index a035b030ff734..2ef0a7d9d8405 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -722,10 +722,24 @@ static int em_recalc_and_update(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
  * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
  * are correctly calculated.
  */
-static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
+static void em_adjust_new_capacity(unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev,
 				   struct em_perf_domain *pd)
 {
+	unsigned long cpu_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
 	struct em_perf_table *em_table;
+	struct em_perf_state *table;
+	unsigned long em_max_perf;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	table = em_perf_state_from_pd(pd);
+	em_max_perf = table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].performance;
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	if (em_max_perf == cpu_capacity)
+		return;
+
+	pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n", cpu,
+		 cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
 
 	em_table = em_table_dup(pd);
 	if (!em_table) {
@@ -741,9 +755,6 @@ static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
 static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t cpu_done_mask;
-	struct em_perf_state *table;
-	struct em_perf_domain *pd;
-	unsigned long cpu_capacity;
 	int cpu;
 
 	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_done_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
@@ -754,7 +765,7 @@ static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
 	/* Check if CPUs capacity has changed than update EM */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-		unsigned long em_max_perf;
+		struct em_perf_domain *pd;
 		struct device *dev;
 
 		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_done_mask))
@@ -777,24 +788,7 @@ static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
 		cpumask_or(cpu_done_mask, cpu_done_mask,
 			   em_span_cpus(pd));
 
-		cpu_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
-
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		table = em_perf_state_from_pd(pd);
-		em_max_perf = table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].performance;
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-
-		/*
-		 * Check if the CPU capacity has been adjusted during boot
-		 * and trigger the update for new performance values.
-		 */
-		if (em_max_perf == cpu_capacity)
-			continue;
-
-		pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n",
-			 cpu, cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
-
-		em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd);
+		em_adjust_new_capacity(cpu, dev, pd);
 	}
 
 	free_cpumask_var(cpu_done_mask);
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-21 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16 12:51 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] PM: EM: Fix late boot with holes in CPU topology" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-10-21 19:22 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/4] PM: EM: Drop unused parameter from em_adjust_new_capacity() Sasha Levin
2025-10-21 19:22   ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/4] PM: EM: Slightly reduce em_check_capacity_update() overhead Sasha Levin
2025-10-21 19:22   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-10-21 19:22   ` [PATCH 6.12.y 4/4] PM: EM: Fix late boot with holes in CPU topology Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251021192225.2899605-3-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox