* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
@ 2025-10-26 14:33 gregkh
2025-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2025-10-26 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: matttbe, geliang, kuba; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e84cb860ac3ce67ec6ecc364433fd5b412c448bc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025102638-brewery-wanting-8089@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e84cb860ac3ce67ec6ecc364433fd5b412c448bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:53:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR
The special C-flag case expects the ADD_ADDR to be received when
switching to 'fully-established'. But for various reasons, the ADD_ADDR
could be sent after the "4th ACK", and the special case doesn't work.
On NIPA, the new test validating this special case for the C-flag failed
a few times, e.g.
102 default limits, server deny join id 0
syn rx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] syn rx expected 2
Server ns stats
(...)
MPTcpExtAddAddrTx 1
MPTcpExtEchoAdd 1
Client ns stats
(...)
MPTcpExtAddAddr 1
MPTcpExtEchoAddTx 1
synack rx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] synack rx expected 2
ack rx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] ack rx expected 2
join Rx [FAIL] see above
syn tx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] syn tx expected 2
join Tx [FAIL] see above
I had a suspicion about what the issue could be: the ADD_ADDR might have
been received after the switch to the 'fully-established' state. The
issue was not easy to reproduce. The packet capture shown that the
ADD_ADDR can indeed be sent with a delay, and the client would not try
to establish subflows to it as expected.
A simple fix is not to mark the endpoints as 'used' in the C-flag case,
when looking at creating subflows to the remote initial IP address and
port. In this case, there is no need to try.
Note: newly added fullmesh endpoints will still continue to be used as
expected, thanks to the conditions behind mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case.
Fixes: 4b1ff850e0c1 ("mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251020-net-mptcp-c-flag-late-add-addr-v1-1-8207030cb0e8@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c
index e0f44dc232aa..2ae95476dba3 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c
@@ -370,6 +370,10 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
}
subflow:
+ /* No need to try establishing subflows to remote id0 if not allowed */
+ if (mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case(msk))
+ goto exit;
+
/* check if should create a new subflow */
while (msk->pm.local_addr_used < endp_subflow_max &&
msk->pm.extra_subflows < limit_extra_subflows) {
@@ -401,6 +405,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
__mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &local, &addrs[i]);
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
}
+
+exit:
mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(msk);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6.6.y] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR
2025-10-26 14:33 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
@ 2025-10-27 16:28 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2025-10-27 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0), Geliang Tang, Jakub Kicinski, Sasha Levin
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e84cb860ac3ce67ec6ecc364433fd5b412c448bc ]
The special C-flag case expects the ADD_ADDR to be received when
switching to 'fully-established'. But for various reasons, the ADD_ADDR
could be sent after the "4th ACK", and the special case doesn't work.
On NIPA, the new test validating this special case for the C-flag failed
a few times, e.g.
102 default limits, server deny join id 0
syn rx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] syn rx expected 2
Server ns stats
(...)
MPTcpExtAddAddrTx 1
MPTcpExtEchoAdd 1
Client ns stats
(...)
MPTcpExtAddAddr 1
MPTcpExtEchoAddTx 1
synack rx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] synack rx expected 2
ack rx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] ack rx expected 2
join Rx [FAIL] see above
syn tx [FAIL] got 0 JOIN[s] syn tx expected 2
join Tx [FAIL] see above
I had a suspicion about what the issue could be: the ADD_ADDR might have
been received after the switch to the 'fully-established' state. The
issue was not easy to reproduce. The packet capture shown that the
ADD_ADDR can indeed be sent with a delay, and the client would not try
to establish subflows to it as expected.
A simple fix is not to mark the endpoints as 'used' in the C-flag case,
when looking at creating subflows to the remote initial IP address and
port. In this case, there is no need to try.
Note: newly added fullmesh endpoints will still continue to be used as
expected, thanks to the conditions behind mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case.
Fixes: 4b1ff850e0c1 ("mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251020-net-mptcp-c-flag-late-add-addr-v1-1-8207030cb0e8@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ applied to pm_netlink.c instead of pm_kernel.c ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 9d2c38421f7a2..7fd6714f41fe7 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -619,6 +619,10 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
}
subflow:
+ /* No need to try establishing subflows to remote id0 if not allowed */
+ if (mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case(msk))
+ goto exit;
+
/* check if should create a new subflow */
while (msk->pm.local_addr_used < local_addr_max &&
msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) {
@@ -650,6 +654,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
__mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &local.addr, &addrs[i]);
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
}
+
+exit:
mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(msk);
}
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-27 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-26 14:33 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: C-flag: handle late ADD_ADDR Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox