From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: leitao@debian.org,horms@kernel.org,jv@jvosburgh.net,kuba@kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:11:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025112006-author-harmony-d5f7@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 49c8d2c1f94cc2f4d1a108530d7ba52614b874c2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025112006-author-harmony-d5f7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 49c8d2c1f94cc2f4d1a108530d7ba52614b874c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 06:03:37 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing
incorrect cleanup
commit efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free") incorrectly
ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev->npinfo to NULL during
netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks.
Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup:
1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev->npinfo is
allocated, and refcnt = 1
- Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In
this case, there is just one.
2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and
npinfo->refcnt += 1.
- Now dev->npinfo->refcnt = 2;
- There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev.
3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:
- The first cleanup succeeds and clears np->dev->npinfo, ignoring
refcnt.
- It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);`
- Set dev->npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup
- No ->ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called
4) Now the second target tries to clean up
- The second cleanup fails because np->dev->npinfo is already NULL.
* In this case, ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and
the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll
instance)
- This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by
kmemleak.
Revert commit efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free") and adds
clarifying comments emphasizing that npinfo cleanup should only happen
once the refcount reaches zero, ensuring stable and correct netpoll
behavior.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17.x
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
Fixes: efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free")
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107-netconsole_torture-v10-1-749227b55f63@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index c85f740065fc..331764845e8f 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -811,6 +811,10 @@ static void __netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
if (!npinfo)
return;
+ /* At this point, there is a single npinfo instance per netdevice, and
+ * its refcnt tracks how many netpoll structures are linked to it. We
+ * only perform npinfo cleanup when the refcnt decrements to zero.
+ */
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&npinfo->refcnt)) {
const struct net_device_ops *ops;
@@ -820,8 +824,7 @@ static void __netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);
call_rcu(&npinfo->rcu, rcu_cleanup_netpoll_info);
- } else
- RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);
+ }
skb_pool_flush(np);
}
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 16:11 gregkh [this message]
2025-11-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/4] netpoll: remove netpoll_srcu Sasha Levin
2025-11-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/4] net: netpoll: Individualize the skb pool Sasha Levin
2025-11-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 3/4] net: netpoll: flush skb pool during cleanup Sasha Levin
2025-11-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 4/4] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025112006-author-harmony-d5f7@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox