Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
@ 2025-11-20 16:11 gregkh
  2025-11-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/4] netpoll: remove netpoll_srcu Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2025-11-20 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: leitao, horms, jv, kuba, stable; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 49c8d2c1f94cc2f4d1a108530d7ba52614b874c2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025112006-author-harmony-d5f7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 49c8d2c1f94cc2f4d1a108530d7ba52614b874c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 06:03:37 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing
 incorrect cleanup

commit efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free") incorrectly
ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev->npinfo to NULL during
netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks.

Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup:

1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev->npinfo is
   allocated, and refcnt = 1
   - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In
     this case, there is just one.

2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and
   npinfo->refcnt += 1.
   - Now dev->npinfo->refcnt = 2;
   - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev.

3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:
   - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np->dev->npinfo, ignoring
     refcnt.
     - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);`
   - Set dev->npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup
   - No ->ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called

4) Now the second target tries to clean up
   - The second cleanup fails because np->dev->npinfo is already NULL.
     * In this case, ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and
       the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll
       instance)
  - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by
    kmemleak.

Revert commit efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free") and adds
clarifying comments emphasizing that npinfo cleanup should only happen
once the refcount reaches zero, ensuring stable and correct netpoll
behavior.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17.x
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
Fixes: efa95b01da18 ("netpoll: fix use after free")
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107-netconsole_torture-v10-1-749227b55f63@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index c85f740065fc..331764845e8f 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -811,6 +811,10 @@ static void __netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
 	if (!npinfo)
 		return;
 
+	/* At this point, there is a single npinfo instance per netdevice, and
+	 * its refcnt tracks how many netpoll structures are linked to it. We
+	 * only perform npinfo cleanup when the refcnt decrements to zero.
+	 */
 	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&npinfo->refcnt)) {
 		const struct net_device_ops *ops;
 
@@ -820,8 +824,7 @@ static void __netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
 
 		RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);
 		call_rcu(&npinfo->rcu, rcu_cleanup_netpoll_info);
-	} else
-		RCU_INIT_POINTER(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);
+	}
 
 	skb_pool_flush(np);
 }


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-20 19:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-20 16:11 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/4] netpoll: remove netpoll_srcu Sasha Levin
2025-11-20 19:56   ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/4] net: netpoll: Individualize the skb pool Sasha Levin
2025-11-20 19:56   ` [PATCH 6.6.y 3/4] net: netpoll: flush skb pool during cleanup Sasha Levin
2025-11-20 19:56   ` [PATCH 6.6.y 4/4] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox