* Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2 6/6] ixgbe: fix integer overflow and wrong bit position in ixgbe_validate_rtr()
[not found] <20260408131154.2661818-7-aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
@ 2026-04-13 14:03 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2026-04-13 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: aleksandr.loktionov
Cc: 'Simon Horman', intel-wired-lan, anthony.l.nguyen, netdev,
stable
From: 'Simon Horman' <horms@kernel.org>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
---
ixgbe: fix integer overflow and wrong bit position in ixgbe_validate_rtr()
This commit fixes two bugs in ixgbe_validate_rtr() by masking the
traffic-class field properly before assigning it to a u8, and correctly
shifting the mask for clearing out-of-bounds entries.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index 5ff462a848feb..8ebf717ce4017 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -9782,11 +9782,12 @@ static void ixgbe_validate_rtr(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u8 tc)
> rsave = reg;
>
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRAFFIC_CLASS; i++) {
> - u8 up2tc = reg >> (i * IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT);
> + u8 up2tc = (reg >> (i * IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT)) &
> + IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_MASK;
>
> /* If up2tc is out of bounds default to zero */
> if (up2tc > tc)
This wasn't introduced by this patch, but is there a pre-existing off-by-one
error in this bounds check?
If tc represents the number of enabled traffic classes (e.g., 4), the valid TC
indices would be 0 through tc - 1. If up2tc equals tc, it would be out of
bounds, but the condition up2tc > tc will evaluate to false and the invalid
mapping won't be cleared.
Could this allow an invalid UP-to-TC mapping to persist in the hardware
register, potentially causing received packets to be mis-steered to an
uninitialized or non-existent traffic class queue?
Should the condition be corrected to ensure up2tc is strictly less than tc
when tc > 0?
> - reg &= ~(0x7 << IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT);
> + reg &= ~(IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_MASK << (i * IXGBE_RTRUP2TC_UP_SHIFT));
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-04-13 14:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260408131154.2661818-7-aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
2026-04-13 14:03 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2 6/6] ixgbe: fix integer overflow and wrong bit position in ixgbe_validate_rtr() Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox