public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	syzbot+67b90111784a3eac8c04@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>,
	Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>,
	Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>, Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y 2/2] ocfs2: fix possible deadlock between unlink and dio_end_io_write
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:58:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260420145833.1151197-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420145833.1151197-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit b02da26a992db0c0e2559acbda0fc48d4a2fd337 ]

ocfs2_unlink takes orphan dir inode_lock first and then ip_alloc_sem,
while in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write, it acquires these locks in reverse order.
This creates an ABBA lock ordering violation on lock classes
ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[ORPHAN_DIR_SYSTEM_INODE] and
ocfs2_file_ip_alloc_sem_key.

Lock Chain #0 (orphan dir inode_lock -> ip_alloc_sem):
ocfs2_unlink
  ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir
    ocfs2_lookup_lock_orphan_dir
      inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode) <- lock A
    __ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir
      ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert
        ocfs2_extend_dir
	  ocfs2_expand_inline_dir
	    down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem) <- Lock B

Lock Chain #1 (ip_alloc_sem -> orphan dir inode_lock):
ocfs2_dio_end_io_write
  down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem) <- Lock B
  ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan()
    inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode) <- Lock A

Deadlock Scenario:
  CPU0 (unlink)                     CPU1 (dio_end_io_write)
  ------                            ------
  inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode)
                                    down_write(ip_alloc_sem)
  down_write(ip_alloc_sem)
                                    inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode)

Since ip_alloc_sem is to protect allocation changes, which is unrelated
with operations in ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan.  So move
ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan out of ip_alloc_sem to fix the deadlock.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260306032211.1016452-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Reported-by: syzbot+67b90111784a3eac8c04@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=67b90111784a3eac8c04
Fixes: a86a72a4a4e0 ("ocfs2: take ip_alloc_sem in ocfs2_dio_get_block & ocfs2_dio_end_io_write")
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
index c4a47ea14b5fe..37aafa223c052 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
@@ -2325,8 +2325,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
-
 	/* Delete orphan before acquire i_rwsem. */
 	if (dwc->dw_orphaned) {
 		BUG_ON(dwc->dw_writer_pid != task_pid_nr(current));
@@ -2339,6 +2337,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
 			mlog_errno(ret);
 	}
 
+	down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
 	di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data;
 
 	ocfs2_init_dinode_extent_tree(&et, INODE_CACHE(inode), di_bh);
-- 
2.53.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-20 13:05 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ocfs2: fix possible deadlock between unlink and" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2026-04-20 14:58 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 1/2] fs/ocfs2: fix comments mentioning i_mutex Sasha Levin
2026-04-20 14:58   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260420145833.1151197-2-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gechangwei@live.cn \
    --cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=jiangqi903@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=piaojun@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+67b90111784a3eac8c04@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox