* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: nSVM: Refactor checking LBRV enablement in vmcb12 into a" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
@ 2026-05-03 12:16 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-05-03 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yosry, seanjc; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 290c8d82023ab0e1d2782d37136541e017174d7c
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026050313-thorn-escapade-d954@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 290c8d82023ab0e1d2782d37136541e017174d7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 00:34:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: nSVM: Refactor checking LBRV enablement in vmcb12 into a
helper
Refactor the vCPU cap and vmcb12 flag checks into a helper. The
unlikely() annotation is dropped, it's unlikely (huh) to make a
difference and the CPU will probably predict it better on its own.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260303003421.2185681-7-yosry@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 7a472d7c6e98..d419fd516fa9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -640,6 +640,12 @@ void nested_vmcb02_compute_g_pat(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr->save.g_pat = svm->vmcb01.ptr->save.g_pat;
}
+static bool nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LBRV) &&
+ (to_svm(vcpu)->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK);
+}
+
static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12)
{
bool new_vmcb12 = false;
@@ -704,8 +710,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12
vmcb_mark_dirty(vmcb02, VMCB_DR);
}
- if (unlikely(guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LBRV) &&
- (svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))) {
+ if (nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv(vcpu)) {
/*
* Reserved bits of DEBUGCTL are ignored. Be consistent with
* svm_set_msr's definition of reserved bits.
@@ -1233,8 +1238,7 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
if (!nested_exit_on_intr(svm))
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, &svm->vcpu);
- if (unlikely(guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LBRV) &&
- (svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))) {
+ if (nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv(vcpu)) {
svm_copy_lbrs(&vmcb12->save, &vmcb02->save);
} else {
svm_copy_lbrs(&vmcb01->save, &vmcb02->save);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-05-03 12:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-03 12:16 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: nSVM: Refactor checking LBRV enablement in vmcb12 into a" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox