* [PATCH 1/2] vfio/pci: Fix racy bitfields and tighten struct layout
[not found] <20260507192206.1350046-1-alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
@ 2026-05-07 19:22 ` Alex Williamson
2026-05-07 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfio/mlx5: " Alex Williamson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2026-05-07 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex; +Cc: Alex Williamson, kvm, jgg, rananta, yishaih, stable
Bitfield operations are not atomic, they use a read-modify-write
pattern, therefore we should be careful not to pack bitfields that
can be concurrently updated into the same storage unit.
The split fields (virq_disabled, bardirty, pm_intx_masked,
pm_runtime_engaged, sriov_pwr_active) are mutated post-init from
contexts that don't serialize against the other writers in the same
storage unit, so a bitfield RMW could drop an adjacent field's
update. The remaining bitfields are touched only during probe or
close where no concurrent writer exists, so they stay packed.
While reordering, place virq_disabled and bardirty earlier to fill
an existing alignment hole.
Fixes: 9cd0f6d5cbb6 ("vfio/pci: Use bitfield for struct vfio_pci_core_device flags")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
---
include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
index 9a39a13a6576..8bb3fa0e41dd 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
@@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device {
const struct vfio_pci_device_ops *pci_ops;
void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
+ bool virq_disabled;
+ bool bardirty;
u8 *pci_config_map;
u8 *vconfig;
struct perm_bits *msi_perm;
@@ -117,17 +119,15 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device {
u32 rbar[7];
bool has_dyn_msix:1;
bool pci_2_3:1;
- bool virq_disabled:1;
bool reset_works:1;
bool extended_caps:1;
- bool bardirty:1;
bool has_vga:1;
bool needs_reset:1;
bool nointx:1;
bool needs_pm_restore:1;
- bool pm_intx_masked:1;
- bool pm_runtime_engaged:1;
- bool sriov_pwr_active:1;
+ bool pm_intx_masked;
+ bool pm_runtime_engaged;
+ bool sriov_pwr_active;
struct pci_saved_state *pci_saved_state;
struct pci_saved_state *pm_save;
int ioeventfds_nr;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] vfio/mlx5: Fix racy bitfields and tighten struct layout
[not found] <20260507192206.1350046-1-alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
2026-05-07 19:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfio/pci: Fix racy bitfields and tighten struct layout Alex Williamson
@ 2026-05-07 19:22 ` Alex Williamson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2026-05-07 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex; +Cc: Alex Williamson, kvm, jgg, rananta, yishaih, stable
Bitfield operations are not atomic, they use a read-modify-write
pattern, therefore we should be careful not to pack bitfields that
can be concurrently updated into the same storage unit.
The split fields (is_err and object_changed in mlx5_vhca_page_tracker,
deferred_reset in mlx5vf_pci_core_device) are mutated from contexts
that don't serialize against the other writers in the same storage
unit, so a bitfield RMW could drop an adjacent field's update. The
remaining bitfields are either probe-only or share a single writer
context, so they stay packed.
The page tracker's status field is also relocated to fill the
alignment hole the split exposes.
Fixes: f886473071d6 ("vfio/mlx5: Add support for tracker object change event")
Fixes: 61a2f1460fd0 ("vfio/mlx5: Manage the VF attach/detach callback from the PF")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/cmd.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/cmd.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/cmd.h
index deed0f132f39..b782139eb8be 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/cmd.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/cmd.h
@@ -158,14 +158,14 @@ struct mlx5_vhca_qp {
struct mlx5_vhca_page_tracker {
u32 id;
u32 pdn;
- u8 is_err:1;
- u8 object_changed:1;
+ u8 is_err;
+ u8 object_changed;
+ int status;
struct mlx5_uars_page *uar;
struct mlx5_vhca_cq cq;
struct mlx5_vhca_qp *host_qp;
struct mlx5_vhca_qp *fw_qp;
struct mlx5_nb nb;
- int status;
};
struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device {
@@ -173,11 +173,11 @@ struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device {
int vf_id;
u16 vhca_id;
u8 migrate_cap:1;
- u8 deferred_reset:1;
u8 mdev_detach:1;
u8 log_active:1;
u8 chunk_mode:1;
u8 mig_state_cap:1;
+ u8 deferred_reset;
struct completion tracker_comp;
/* protect migration state */
struct mutex state_mutex;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread