From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com,chao@kernel.org,jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 16:23:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026051205-wheat-facebook-0150@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 019f9dda7f66e55eb94cd32e1d3fff5835f73fbc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026051205-wheat-facebook-0150@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 019f9dda7f66e55eb94cd32e1d3fff5835f73fbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:36:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry
flag usage
f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
marking state. The scenario is as follows:
create & write & fsync 'file A' write checkpoint
- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
- f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
- f2fs_write_checkpoint
- f2fs_flush_merged_writes
- f2fs_sync_node_pages
- f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
- f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
- f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
- f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
- f2fs_flush_nat_entries
- f2fs_write_checkpoint end
- __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
SPO, "fsck --dry-run" find inode has already checkpointed but still
with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi->node_write. The
root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
fully completed.
This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_node_folio() and
protects it with the sbi->node_write lock.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 88bd02c9472a ("f2fs: fix conditions to remain recovery information in f2fs_sync_file")
Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index e027c388207f..630fd3b43a08 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1799,13 +1799,12 @@ static bool __write_node_folio(struct folio *folio, bool atomic, bool *submitted
goto redirty_out;
}
- if (atomic) {
- if (!test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER))
- fio.op_flags |= REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA;
- if (IS_INODE(folio))
- set_dentry_mark(folio,
+ if (atomic && !test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER))
+ fio.op_flags |= REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA;
+
+ if (IS_INODE(folio) && (atomic || is_fsync_dnode(folio)))
+ set_dentry_mark(folio,
f2fs_need_dentry_mark(sbi, ino_of_node(folio)));
- }
/* should add to global list before clearing PAGECACHE status */
if (f2fs_in_warm_node_list(folio)) {
@@ -1956,9 +1955,6 @@ int f2fs_fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
if (is_inode_flag_set(inode,
FI_DIRTY_INODE))
f2fs_update_inode(inode, folio);
- if (!atomic)
- set_dentry_mark(folio,
- f2fs_need_dentry_mark(sbi, ino));
}
/* may be written by other thread */
if (!folio_test_dirty(folio))
reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026051205-wheat-facebook-0150@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox