Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
@ 2026-05-12 14:23 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-05-12 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yangyongpeng, chao, jaegeuk; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 019f9dda7f66e55eb94cd32e1d3fff5835f73fbc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026051205-wheat-facebook-0150@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 019f9dda7f66e55eb94cd32e1d3fff5835f73fbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:36:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry
 flag usage

f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
marking state. The scenario is as follows:

create & write & fsync 'file A'                 write checkpoint
- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
 - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint
                                                 - f2fs_flush_merged_writes
                                                 - f2fs_sync_node_pages
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
 - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
  - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
                                                 - f2fs_flush_nat_entries
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint end
  - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
  SPO, "fsck --dry-run" find inode has already checkpointed but still
  with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set

The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi->node_write. The
root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
fully completed.

This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_node_folio() and
protects it with the sbi->node_write lock.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 88bd02c9472a ("f2fs: fix conditions to remain recovery information in f2fs_sync_file")
Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index e027c388207f..630fd3b43a08 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1799,13 +1799,12 @@ static bool __write_node_folio(struct folio *folio, bool atomic, bool *submitted
 		goto redirty_out;
 	}
 
-	if (atomic) {
-		if (!test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER))
-			fio.op_flags |= REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA;
-		if (IS_INODE(folio))
-			set_dentry_mark(folio,
+	if (atomic && !test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER))
+		fio.op_flags |= REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA;
+
+	if (IS_INODE(folio) && (atomic || is_fsync_dnode(folio)))
+		set_dentry_mark(folio,
 				f2fs_need_dentry_mark(sbi, ino_of_node(folio)));
-	}
 
 	/* should add to global list before clearing PAGECACHE status */
 	if (f2fs_in_warm_node_list(folio)) {
@@ -1956,9 +1955,6 @@ int f2fs_fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
 					if (is_inode_flag_set(inode,
 								FI_DIRTY_INODE))
 						f2fs_update_inode(inode, folio);
-					if (!atomic)
-						set_dentry_mark(folio,
-							f2fs_need_dentry_mark(sbi, ino));
 				}
 				/* may be written by other thread */
 				if (!folio_test_dirty(folio))


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-05-12 14:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-12 14:23 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox