* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children" failed to apply to 7.0-stable tree
@ 2026-05-12 13:59 gregkh
2026-05-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 7.0.y 1/2] eventfs: Simplify code using guard()s Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-05-12 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devnexen, rostedt; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 7.0-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.0.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f67950b2887fa10df50c4317a1fe98a65bc6875b
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026051232-clapped-algebra-8969@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.0.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f67950b2887fa10df50c4317a1fe98a65bc6875b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 16:22:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children
list
Commit d2603279c7d6 ("eventfs: Use list_del_rcu() for SRCU protected
list variable") converted the removal side to pair with the
list_for_each_entry_srcu() walker in eventfs_iterate(). The insertion
in eventfs_create_dir() was left as a plain list_add_tail(), which on
weakly-ordered architectures can expose a new entry to the SRCU reader
before its list pointers and fields are observable.
Use list_add_tail_rcu() so the publication pairs with the existing
list_del_rcu() and list_for_each_entry_srcu().
Fixes: 43aa6f97c2d0 ("eventfs: Get rid of dentry pointers without refcounts")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260418152251.199343-1-devnexen@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
index 81df94038f2e..8dd554508828 100644
--- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
+++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ struct eventfs_inode *eventfs_create_dir(const char *name, struct eventfs_inode
scoped_guard(mutex, &eventfs_mutex) {
if (!parent->is_freed)
- list_add_tail(&ei->list, &parent->children);
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&ei->list, &parent->children);
}
/* Was the parent freed? */
if (list_empty(&ei->list)) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7.0.y 1/2] eventfs: Simplify code using guard()s
2026-05-12 13:59 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children" failed to apply to 7.0-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-05-15 15:06 ` Sasha Levin
2026-05-15 15:07 ` [PATCH 7.0.y 2/2] eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children list Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-05-15 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Masami Hiramatsu (Google),
Sasha Levin
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
[ Upstream commit 4d9b262031ffef203243e53577a90ae6e1090e67 ]
Use guard(mutex), scoped_guard(mutex) and guard(src) to simplify the code
and remove a lot of the jumps to "out:" labels.
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250604151625.250d13e1@gandalf.local.home
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: f67950b2887f ("eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children list")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 96 +++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
index af3387eebef5b..592dac31f5624 100644
--- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
+++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
@@ -180,29 +180,25 @@ static int eventfs_set_attr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
const char *name;
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&eventfs_mutex);
ei = dentry->d_fsdata;
- if (ei->is_freed) {
- /* Do not allow changes if the event is about to be removed. */
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
+ /* Do not allow changes if the event is about to be removed. */
+ if (ei->is_freed)
return -ENODEV;
- }
/* Preallocate the children mode array if necessary */
if (!(dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFDIR)) {
if (!ei->entry_attrs) {
ei->entry_attrs = kzalloc_objs(*ei->entry_attrs,
ei->nr_entries, GFP_NOFS);
- if (!ei->entry_attrs) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!ei->entry_attrs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
}
ret = simple_setattr(idmap, dentry, iattr);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
/*
* If this is a dir, then update the ei cache, only the file
@@ -225,8 +221,6 @@ static int eventfs_set_attr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
}
}
}
- out:
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -530,26 +524,24 @@ static struct dentry *eventfs_root_lookup(struct inode *dir,
struct tracefs_inode *ti;
struct eventfs_inode *ei;
const char *name = dentry->d_name.name;
- struct dentry *result = NULL;
ti = get_tracefs(dir);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(ti->flags & TRACEFS_EVENT_INODE)))
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
- mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&eventfs_mutex);
ei = ti->private;
if (!ei || ei->is_freed)
- goto out;
+ return NULL;
list_for_each_entry(ei_child, &ei->children, list) {
if (strcmp(ei_child->name, name) != 0)
continue;
/* A child is freed and removed from the list at the same time */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ei_child->is_freed))
- goto out;
- result = lookup_dir_entry(dentry, ei, ei_child);
- goto out;
+ return NULL;
+ return lookup_dir_entry(dentry, ei, ei_child);
}
for (int i = 0; i < ei->nr_entries; i++) {
@@ -563,14 +555,12 @@ static struct dentry *eventfs_root_lookup(struct inode *dir,
data = ei->data;
if (entry->callback(name, &mode, &data, &fops) <= 0)
- goto out;
+ return NULL;
+
+ return lookup_file_dentry(dentry, ei, i, mode, data, fops);
- result = lookup_file_dentry(dentry, ei, i, mode, data, fops);
- goto out;
}
- out:
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
- return result;
+ return NULL;
}
/*
@@ -586,7 +576,6 @@ static int eventfs_iterate(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
struct eventfs_inode *ei;
const char *name;
umode_t mode;
- int idx;
int ret = -EINVAL;
int ino;
int i, r, c;
@@ -600,16 +589,13 @@ static int eventfs_iterate(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
c = ctx->pos - 2;
- idx = srcu_read_lock(&eventfs_srcu);
-
- mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
- ei = READ_ONCE(ti->private);
- if (ei && ei->is_freed)
- ei = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
+ guard(srcu)(&eventfs_srcu);
- if (!ei)
- goto out;
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &eventfs_mutex) {
+ ei = READ_ONCE(ti->private);
+ if (!ei || ei->is_freed)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
/*
* Need to create the dentries and inodes to have a consistent
@@ -624,21 +610,19 @@ static int eventfs_iterate(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
entry = &ei->entries[i];
name = entry->name;
- mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
/* If ei->is_freed then just bail here, nothing more to do */
- if (ei->is_freed) {
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
- goto out;
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &eventfs_mutex) {
+ if (ei->is_freed)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ r = entry->callback(name, &mode, &cdata, &fops);
}
- r = entry->callback(name, &mode, &cdata, &fops);
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
if (r <= 0)
continue;
ino = EVENTFS_FILE_INODE_INO;
if (!dir_emit(ctx, name, strlen(name), ino, DT_REG))
- goto out;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
/* Subtract the skipped entries above */
@@ -661,19 +645,13 @@ static int eventfs_iterate(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
ino = eventfs_dir_ino(ei_child);
- if (!dir_emit(ctx, name, strlen(name), ino, DT_DIR))
- goto out_dec;
+ if (!dir_emit(ctx, name, strlen(name), ino, DT_DIR)) {
+ /* Incremented ctx->pos without adding something, reset it */
+ ctx->pos--;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
- ret = 1;
- out:
- srcu_read_unlock(&eventfs_srcu, idx);
-
- return ret;
-
- out_dec:
- /* Incremented ctx->pos without adding something, reset it */
- ctx->pos--;
- goto out;
+ return 1;
}
/**
@@ -730,11 +708,10 @@ struct eventfs_inode *eventfs_create_dir(const char *name, struct eventfs_inode
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->children);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->list);
- mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
- if (!parent->is_freed)
- list_add_tail(&ei->list, &parent->children);
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
-
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &eventfs_mutex) {
+ if (!parent->is_freed)
+ list_add_tail(&ei->list, &parent->children);
+ }
/* Was the parent freed? */
if (list_empty(&ei->list)) {
cleanup_ei(ei);
@@ -880,9 +857,8 @@ void eventfs_remove_dir(struct eventfs_inode *ei)
if (!ei)
return;
- mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&eventfs_mutex);
eventfs_remove_rec(ei, 0);
- mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
}
/**
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7.0.y 2/2] eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children list
2026-05-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 7.0.y 1/2] eventfs: Simplify code using guard()s Sasha Levin
@ 2026-05-15 15:07 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-05-15 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: David Carlier, Steven Rostedt, Sasha Levin
From: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit f67950b2887fa10df50c4317a1fe98a65bc6875b ]
Commit d2603279c7d6 ("eventfs: Use list_del_rcu() for SRCU protected
list variable") converted the removal side to pair with the
list_for_each_entry_srcu() walker in eventfs_iterate(). The insertion
in eventfs_create_dir() was left as a plain list_add_tail(), which on
weakly-ordered architectures can expose a new entry to the SRCU reader
before its list pointers and fields are observable.
Use list_add_tail_rcu() so the publication pairs with the existing
list_del_rcu() and list_for_each_entry_srcu().
Fixes: 43aa6f97c2d0 ("eventfs: Get rid of dentry pointers without refcounts")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260418152251.199343-1-devnexen@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
index 592dac31f5624..4c265192fd9dc 100644
--- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
+++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ struct eventfs_inode *eventfs_create_dir(const char *name, struct eventfs_inode
scoped_guard(mutex, &eventfs_mutex) {
if (!parent->is_freed)
- list_add_tail(&ei->list, &parent->children);
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&ei->list, &parent->children);
}
/* Was the parent freed? */
if (list_empty(&ei->list)) {
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-15 15:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-12 13:59 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children" failed to apply to 7.0-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 7.0.y 1/2] eventfs: Simplify code using guard()s Sasha Levin
2026-05-15 15:07 ` [PATCH 7.0.y 2/2] eventfs: Use list_add_tail_rcu() for SRCU-protected children list Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox