Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect
@ 2026-05-22 11:38 Alva Lan
  2026-05-22 11:39 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/1] " Alva Lan
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alva Lan @ 2026-05-22 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, sashal, stable
  Cc: linux-kernel, linkinjeon, stfrench, d.ornaghi97, knavaneeth786,
	Alva Lan

Hi,

This patch backports upstream commit 49110a8ce654 ("ksmbd: validate owner
of durable handle on reconnect") to the 6.6.y stable branch to address
CVE-2026-31717.

The vulnerability allows any authenticated user to hijack an orphaned
durable file handle by predicting or brute-forcing the persistent ID.

The fix adds owner identity (UID, GID, account name) tracking to durable
handles and validates it during SMB2_CREATE (DHnC) reconnect, per the
MS-SMB2 specification.

An additional adaptation was needed for 6.6.y: in ksmbd_free_global_file_table(),
the call to ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&global_ft) was replaced with
idr_destroy/kfree, since the function changed to take a
struct ksmbd_session *. This matches the approach in upstream commit
d484d621d40f ("ksmbd: add durable scavenger timer").

Testing:
- Build tested: compiled cleanly on x86_64 with CONFIG_SMB_SERVER=y
- Boot tested: kernel 6.6.140 boots and ksmbd serves shares normally
- Functional test: verified using a Python SMB2 test client that:
  1. Legitimate owner (user_a) can reconnect to own durable handle (PASS)
  2. Different user (user_b) is rejected when attempting DHnC reconnect
     with user_a's persistent file ID (PASS - STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND)
- Regression test: normal SMB operations (upload, download, delete, mkdir)
  work correctly for both users

Thanks,
Alva Lan

Namjae Jeon (1):
  ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect

 fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_session.c |  8 +--
 fs/smb/server/oplock.c            |  7 +++
 fs/smb/server/oplock.h            |  1 +
 fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c           |  3 +-
 fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c         | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h         | 12 ++++-
 6 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.6.y 1/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect
  2026-05-22 11:38 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect Alva Lan
@ 2026-05-22 11:39 ` Alva Lan
  2026-05-24 12:09 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] " Sasha Levin
  2026-05-24 15:13 ` Namjae Jeon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alva Lan @ 2026-05-22 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, sashal, stable
  Cc: linux-kernel, linkinjeon, stfrench, d.ornaghi97, knavaneeth786,
	Alva Lan

From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 49110a8ce654bbe56bef7c5e44cce31f4b102b8a ]

Currently, ksmbd does not verify if the user attempting to reconnect
to a durable handle is the same user who originally opened the file.
This allows any authenticated user to hijack an orphaned durable handle
by predicting or brute-forcing the persistent ID.

According to MS-SMB2, the server MUST verify that the SecurityContext
of the reconnect request matches the SecurityContext associated with
the existing open.
Add a durable_owner structure to ksmbd_file to store the original opener's
UID, GID, and account name. and catpure the owner information when a file
handle becomes orphaned. and implementing ksmbd_vfs_compare_durable_owner()
to validate the identity of the requester during SMB2_CREATE (DHnC).

Fixes: c8efcc786146 ("ksmbd: add support for durable handles v1/v2")
Reported-by: Davide Ornaghi <d.ornaghi97@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Navaneeth K <knavaneeth786@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
[ In the function ksmbd_free_global_file_table(), replace
ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&global_ft) with idr_destroy(global_ft.idr)
kfree(global_ft.idr) per commit
d484d621d40f ("ksmbd: add durable scavenger timer"). ]
Signed-off-by: Alva Lan <alvalan9@foxmail.com>
---
 fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_session.c |  8 +--
 fs/smb/server/oplock.c            |  7 +++
 fs/smb/server/oplock.h            |  1 +
 fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c           |  3 +-
 fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c         | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h         | 12 ++++-
 6 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_session.c b/fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_session.c
index e344475a41bd..b39a87e4a746 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_session.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_session.c
@@ -159,11 +159,10 @@ void ksmbd_session_destroy(struct ksmbd_session *sess)
 	if (!sess)
 		return;
 
+	ksmbd_tree_conn_session_logoff(sess);
+	ksmbd_destroy_file_table(sess);
 	if (sess->user)
 		ksmbd_free_user(sess->user);
-
-	ksmbd_tree_conn_session_logoff(sess);
-	ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&sess->file_table);
 	ksmbd_session_rpc_clear_list(sess);
 	free_channel_list(sess);
 	kfree(sess->Preauth_HashValue);
@@ -390,7 +389,8 @@ void destroy_previous_session(struct ksmbd_conn *conn,
 		ksmbd_all_conn_set_status(id, KSMBD_SESS_NEED_SETUP);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&prev_sess->file_table);
+
+	ksmbd_destroy_file_table(prev_sess);
 	prev_sess->state = SMB2_SESSION_EXPIRED;
 	ksmbd_all_conn_set_status(id, KSMBD_SESS_NEED_SETUP);
 out:
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/oplock.c b/fs/smb/server/oplock.c
index c49a75ff5fbb..8487fca425bd 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/oplock.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/oplock.c
@@ -1841,6 +1841,7 @@ int smb2_check_durable_oplock(struct ksmbd_conn *conn,
 			      struct ksmbd_share_config *share,
 			      struct ksmbd_file *fp,
 			      struct lease_ctx_info *lctx,
+			      struct ksmbd_user *user,
 			      char *name)
 {
 	struct oplock_info *opinfo = opinfo_get(fp);
@@ -1849,6 +1850,12 @@ int smb2_check_durable_oplock(struct ksmbd_conn *conn,
 	if (!opinfo)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (ksmbd_vfs_compare_durable_owner(fp, user) == false) {
+		ksmbd_debug(SMB, "Durable handle reconnect failed: owner mismatch\n");
+		ret = -EBADF;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	if (opinfo->is_lease == false) {
 		if (lctx) {
 			pr_err("create context include lease\n");
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/oplock.h b/fs/smb/server/oplock.h
index f8da0bba766b..e6c4fbe5cf4e 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/oplock.h
+++ b/fs/smb/server/oplock.h
@@ -133,5 +133,6 @@ int smb2_check_durable_oplock(struct ksmbd_conn *conn,
 			      struct ksmbd_share_config *share,
 			      struct ksmbd_file *fp,
 			      struct lease_ctx_info *lctx,
+			      struct ksmbd_user *user,
 			      char *name);
 #endif /* __KSMBD_OPLOCK_H */
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c b/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
index 6c41a67be725..e14a126c3273 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
@@ -2992,7 +2992,8 @@ int smb2_open(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		}
 
 		if (dh_info.reconnected == true) {
-			rc = smb2_check_durable_oplock(conn, share, dh_info.fp, lc, name);
+			rc = smb2_check_durable_oplock(conn, share, dh_info.fp,
+					lc, sess->user, name);
 			if (rc) {
 				ksmbd_put_durable_fd(dh_info.fp);
 				goto err_out2;
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c b/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c
index eacc6ef41db0..cf53142afe7c 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include "connection.h"
 #include "mgmt/tree_connect.h"
 #include "mgmt/user_session.h"
+#include "mgmt/user_config.h"
 #include "smb_common.h"
 
 #define S_DEL_PENDING			1
@@ -369,6 +370,8 @@ static void __ksmbd_close_fd(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft, struct ksmbd_file *fp)
 
 	if (ksmbd_stream_fd(fp))
 		kfree(fp->stream.name);
+	kfree(fp->owner.name);
+
 	kmem_cache_free(filp_cache, fp);
 }
 
@@ -677,11 +680,13 @@ void ksmbd_update_fstate(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft, struct ksmbd_file *fp,
 }
 
 static int
-__close_file_table_ids(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft,
+__close_file_table_ids(struct ksmbd_session *sess,
 		       struct ksmbd_tree_connect *tcon,
 		       bool (*skip)(struct ksmbd_tree_connect *tcon,
-				    struct ksmbd_file *fp))
+				    struct ksmbd_file *fp,
+				    struct ksmbd_user *user))
 {
+	struct ksmbd_file_table *ft = &sess->file_table;
 	struct ksmbd_file *fp;
 	unsigned int id = 0;
 	int num = 0;
@@ -694,7 +699,7 @@ __close_file_table_ids(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft,
 			break;
 		}
 
-		if (skip(tcon, fp) ||
+		if (skip(tcon, fp, sess->user) ||
 		    !atomic_dec_and_test(&fp->refcount)) {
 			id++;
 			write_unlock(&ft->lock);
@@ -746,13 +751,68 @@ static inline bool is_reconnectable(struct ksmbd_file *fp)
 }
 
 static bool tree_conn_fd_check(struct ksmbd_tree_connect *tcon,
-			       struct ksmbd_file *fp)
+			       struct ksmbd_file *fp,
+			       struct ksmbd_user *user)
 {
 	return fp->tcon != tcon;
 }
 
+/*
+ * ksmbd_vfs_copy_durable_owner - Copy owner info for durable reconnect
+ * @fp: ksmbd file pointer to store owner info
+ * @user: user pointer to copy from
+ *
+ * This function binds the current user's identity to the file handle
+ * to satisfy MS-SMB2 Step 8 (SecurityContext matching) during reconnect.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, or negative error code on failure
+ */
+static int ksmbd_vfs_copy_durable_owner(struct ksmbd_file *fp,
+		struct ksmbd_user *user)
+{
+	if (!user)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Duplicate the user name to ensure identity persistence */
+	fp->owner.name = kstrdup(user->name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fp->owner.name)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	fp->owner.uid = user->uid;
+	fp->owner.gid = user->gid;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * ksmbd_vfs_compare_durable_owner - Verify if the requester is original owner
+ * @fp: existing ksmbd file pointer
+ * @user: user pointer of the reconnect requester
+ *
+ * Compares the UID, GID, and name of the current requester against the
+ * original owner stored in the file handle.
+ *
+ * Return: true if the user matches, false otherwise
+ */
+bool ksmbd_vfs_compare_durable_owner(struct ksmbd_file *fp,
+		struct ksmbd_user *user)
+{
+	if (!user || !fp->owner.name)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Check if the UID and GID match first (fast path) */
+	if (fp->owner.uid != user->uid || fp->owner.gid != user->gid)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Validate the account name to ensure the same SecurityContext */
+	if (strcmp(fp->owner.name, user->name))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static bool session_fd_check(struct ksmbd_tree_connect *tcon,
-			     struct ksmbd_file *fp)
+			     struct ksmbd_file *fp, struct ksmbd_user *user)
 {
 	struct ksmbd_inode *ci;
 	struct oplock_info *op;
@@ -762,6 +822,9 @@ static bool session_fd_check(struct ksmbd_tree_connect *tcon,
 	if (!is_reconnectable(fp))
 		return false;
 
+	if (ksmbd_vfs_copy_durable_owner(fp, user))
+		return false;
+
 	conn = fp->conn;
 	ci = fp->f_ci;
 	down_write(&ci->m_lock);
@@ -789,7 +852,7 @@ static bool session_fd_check(struct ksmbd_tree_connect *tcon,
 
 void ksmbd_close_tree_conn_fds(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 {
-	int num = __close_file_table_ids(&work->sess->file_table,
+	int num = __close_file_table_ids(work->sess,
 					 work->tcon,
 					 tree_conn_fd_check);
 
@@ -798,7 +861,7 @@ void ksmbd_close_tree_conn_fds(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 
 void ksmbd_close_session_fds(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 {
-	int num = __close_file_table_ids(&work->sess->file_table,
+	int num = __close_file_table_ids(work->sess,
 					 work->tcon,
 					 session_fd_check);
 
@@ -820,7 +883,8 @@ void ksmbd_free_global_file_table(void)
 		kmem_cache_free(filp_cache, fp);
 	}
 
-	ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&global_ft);
+	idr_destroy(global_ft.idr);
+	kfree(global_ft.idr);
 }
 
 int ksmbd_validate_name_reconnect(struct ksmbd_share_config *share,
@@ -894,6 +958,10 @@ int ksmbd_reopen_durable_fd(struct ksmbd_work *work, struct ksmbd_file *fp)
 	}
 	up_write(&ci->m_lock);
 
+	fp->owner.uid = fp->owner.gid = 0;
+	kfree(fp->owner.name);
+	fp->owner.name = NULL;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -908,12 +976,14 @@ int ksmbd_init_file_table(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void ksmbd_destroy_file_table(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft)
+void ksmbd_destroy_file_table(struct ksmbd_session *sess)
 {
+	struct ksmbd_file_table *ft = &sess->file_table;
+
 	if (!ft->idr)
 		return;
 
-	__close_file_table_ids(ft, NULL, session_fd_check);
+	__close_file_table_ids(sess, NULL, session_fd_check);
 	idr_destroy(ft->idr);
 	kfree(ft->idr);
 	ft->idr = NULL;
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h b/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h
index 5a225e7055f1..1f13cfdf4cac 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h
+++ b/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h
@@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ enum {
 	FP_CLOSED
 };
 
+/* Owner information for durable handle reconnect */
+struct durable_owner {
+	unsigned int uid;
+	unsigned int gid;
+	char *name;
+};
+
 struct ksmbd_file {
 	struct file			*filp;
 	u64				persistent_id;
@@ -110,6 +117,7 @@ struct ksmbd_file {
 	bool				is_durable;
 	bool				is_persistent;
 	bool				is_resilient;
+	struct durable_owner		owner;
 };
 
 static inline void set_ctx_actor(struct dir_context *ctx,
@@ -136,7 +144,7 @@ static inline bool ksmbd_stream_fd(struct ksmbd_file *fp)
 }
 
 int ksmbd_init_file_table(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft);
-void ksmbd_destroy_file_table(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft);
+void ksmbd_destroy_file_table(struct ksmbd_session *sess);
 int ksmbd_close_fd(struct ksmbd_work *work, u64 id);
 struct ksmbd_file *ksmbd_lookup_fd_fast(struct ksmbd_work *work, u64 id);
 struct ksmbd_file *ksmbd_lookup_foreign_fd(struct ksmbd_work *work, u64 id);
@@ -160,6 +168,8 @@ void ksmbd_free_global_file_table(void);
 void ksmbd_set_fd_limit(unsigned long limit);
 void ksmbd_update_fstate(struct ksmbd_file_table *ft, struct ksmbd_file *fp,
 			 unsigned int state);
+bool ksmbd_vfs_compare_durable_owner(struct ksmbd_file *fp,
+		struct ksmbd_user *user);
 
 /*
  * INODE hash
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect
  2026-05-22 11:38 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect Alva Lan
  2026-05-22 11:39 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/1] " Alva Lan
@ 2026-05-24 12:09 ` Sasha Levin
  2026-05-24 15:13 ` Namjae Jeon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-05-24 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, stable
  Cc: Sasha Levin, linux-kernel, linkinjeon, stfrench, d.ornaghi97,
	knavaneeth786, Alva Lan

> This patch backports upstream commit 49110a8ce654 ("ksmbd: validate owner
> of durable handle on reconnect") to the 6.6.y stable branch to address
> CVE-2026-31717.
> [...]
> An additional adaptation was needed for 6.6.y: in ksmbd_free_global_file_table(),
> the call to ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&global_ft) was replaced with
> idr_destroy/kfree, since the function changed to take a
> struct ksmbd_session *. This matches the approach in upstream commit
> d484d621d40f ("ksmbd: add durable scavenger timer").

Thanks for the backport. The 6.12.y version has been queued.

For 6.6.y, the diff isn't a straight cherry-pick and the rewritten
ksmbd_free_global_file_table() path in particular is a non-trivial
stable-only adaptation. Before I queue this for 6.6.y, could you get
Acks from the ksmbd maintainers on the 6.6.y diff specifically? In
particular:

  Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
  Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>

Once one of them has Ack'd the 6.6 adaptation I'll pick it up.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect
  2026-05-22 11:38 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect Alva Lan
  2026-05-22 11:39 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/1] " Alva Lan
  2026-05-24 12:09 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] " Sasha Levin
@ 2026-05-24 15:13 ` Namjae Jeon
  2026-05-25 11:17   ` Alva Lan
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2026-05-24 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alva Lan
  Cc: gregkh, sashal, stable, linux-kernel, stfrench, d.ornaghi97,
	knavaneeth786

Hi Alva,

> An additional adaptation was needed for 6.6.y: in ksmbd_free_global_file_table(),
> the call to ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&global_ft) was replaced with
> idr_destroy/kfree, since the function changed to take a
> struct ksmbd_session *. This matches the approach in upstream commit
> d484d621d40f ("ksmbd: add durable scavenger timer").
I think we should backport the upstream commit d484d621d40f ("ksmbd:
add durable scavenger timer") first, along with any subsequent bug-fix
patches related to it.
Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect
  2026-05-24 15:13 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2026-05-25 11:17   ` Alva Lan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alva Lan @ 2026-05-25 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Namjae Jeon
  Cc: gregkh, sashal, stable, linux-kernel, stfrench, d.ornaghi97,
	knavaneeth786


On 5/24/2026 11:13 PM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> Hi Alva,
>
>> An additional adaptation was needed for 6.6.y: in ksmbd_free_global_file_table(),
>> the call to ksmbd_destroy_file_table(&global_ft) was replaced with
>> idr_destroy/kfree, since the function changed to take a
>> struct ksmbd_session *. This matches the approach in upstream commit
>> d484d621d40f ("ksmbd: add durable scavenger timer").
> I think we should backport the upstream commit d484d621d40f ("ksmbd:
> add durable scavenger timer") first, along with any subsequent bug-fix
> patches related to it.
> Thanks!

Thanks for your review. I have sent a v2 backport.

Alva Lan



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-25 11:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-22 11:38 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] ksmbd: validate owner of durable handle on reconnect Alva Lan
2026-05-22 11:39 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/1] " Alva Lan
2026-05-24 12:09 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 0/1] " Sasha Levin
2026-05-24 15:13 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-05-25 11:17   ` Alva Lan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox