Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [stable 6.1.y] Will commit 7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr") be included?
@ 2026-05-26 13:50 Franz Schnyder
  2026-05-27  8:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Franz Schnyder @ 2026-05-26 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Sasha Levin, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chuck Lever

Hello,

Our OE-Kirkstone builds of linux-6.1.y from linux-stable-rc are failing.
The problem is that the following commit is queued up:
7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr")

It calls `dso__rel`, which is not present in 6.1.y.

util/symbol-elf.c:1010:21: warning: implicit declaration of function 'dso__rel'; did you mean 'dso__get'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 1010 |                 if (dso__rel(dso))
      |                     ^~~~~~~~
      |                     dso__get


I wanted to ask if the commit will be dropped in the future stable
release, or if the patch that introduces `dso__rel` will be included first.

Kind regards,

Franz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [stable 6.1.y] Will commit 7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr") be included?
  2026-05-26 13:50 [stable 6.1.y] Will commit 7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr") be included? Franz Schnyder
@ 2026-05-27  8:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2026-05-27  8:50   ` Franz Schnyder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2026-05-27  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Franz Schnyder; +Cc: stable, Sasha Levin, Chuck Lever

On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Franz Schnyder wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Our OE-Kirkstone builds of linux-6.1.y from linux-stable-rc are failing.
> The problem is that the following commit is queued up:
> 7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr")

I do not see that git id in Linus's tree, are you sure that is correct?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [stable 6.1.y] Will commit 7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr") be included?
  2026-05-27  8:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2026-05-27  8:50   ` Franz Schnyder
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Franz Schnyder @ 2026-05-27  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: stable, Sasha Levin, Chuck Lever

On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 10:12:04AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Franz Schnyder wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Our OE-Kirkstone builds of linux-6.1.y from linux-stable-rc are failing.
> > The problem is that the following commit is queued up:
> > 7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr")
> 
> I do not see that git id in Linus's tree, are you sure that is correct?

I copied the id from the stable-rc tree instead of the one from Linus,
sorry.

The commit id in Linus's tree is
9a82bfde4775b ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr")

Thanks,

Franz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-27  8:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-26 13:50 [stable 6.1.y] Will commit 7e96a281fa07 ("perf tools: Fix module symbol resolution for non-zero .text sh_addr") be included? Franz Schnyder
2026-05-27  8:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-05-27  8:50   ` Franz Schnyder

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox