* [PATCH stable 6.1 1/1] selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link test
@ 2026-06-18 7:41 Shung-Hsi Yu
2026-06-19 4:07 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shung-Hsi Yu @ 2026-06-18 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu, Ihor Solodrai, Andrii Nakryiko
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@pm.me>
commit e6c209da7e0e9aaf955a7b59e91ed78c2b6c96fb upstream.
Recently perf_link test started unreliably failing on libbpf CI:
* https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11260672407/job/31312405473
* https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11260992334/job/31315514626
* https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11263162459/job/31320458251
Part of the test is running a dummy loop for a while and then checking
for a counter incremented by the test program.
Instead of waiting for an arbitrary number of loop iterations once,
check for the test counter in a loop and use get_time_ns() helper to
enforce a 100ms timeout.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/zuRd072x9tumn2iN4wDNs5av0nu5nekMNV4PkR-YwCT10eFFTrUtZBRkLWFbrcCe7guvLStGQlhibo8qWojCO7i2-NGajes5GYIyynexD-w=@pm.me/
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241011153104.249800-1-ihor.solodrai@pm.me
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
index 224eba6fef2e..d734526d6a16 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
@@ -4,8 +4,12 @@
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "testing_helpers.h"
#include "test_perf_link.skel.h"
+#define BURN_TIMEOUT_MS 100
+#define BURN_TIMEOUT_NS BURN_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000000
+
static void burn_cpu(void)
{
volatile int j = 0;
@@ -32,6 +36,7 @@ void serial_test_perf_link(void)
int run_cnt_before, run_cnt_after;
struct bpf_link_info info;
__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+ __u64 timeout_time_ns;
/* create perf event */
memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
@@ -63,8 +68,14 @@ void serial_test_perf_link(void)
ASSERT_GT(info.prog_id, 0, "link_prog_id");
/* ensure we get at least one perf_event prog execution */
- burn_cpu();
- ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->run_cnt, 0, "run_cnt");
+ timeout_time_ns = get_time_ns() + BURN_TIMEOUT_NS;
+ while (true) {
+ burn_cpu();
+ if (skel->bss->run_cnt > 0)
+ break;
+ if (!ASSERT_LT(get_time_ns(), timeout_time_ns, "run_cnt_timeout"))
+ break;
+ }
/* perf_event is still active, but we close link and BPF program
* shouldn't be executed anymore
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH stable 6.1 1/1] selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link test
2026-06-18 7:41 [PATCH stable 6.1 1/1] selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link test Shung-Hsi Yu
@ 2026-06-19 4:07 ` Sasha Levin
2026-06-19 4:23 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-06-19 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Sasha Levin, Shung-Hsi Yu, Ihor Solodrai, Andrii Nakryiko
> [PATCH stable 6.1 1/1] selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link
> test
Thanks, but will this even build on 6.1? it depends on the get_time_ns()...
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH stable 6.1 1/1] selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link test
2026-06-19 4:07 ` Sasha Levin
@ 2026-06-19 4:23 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shung-Hsi Yu @ 2026-06-19 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: stable, Ihor Solodrai, Andrii Nakryiko
On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 12:07:08AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > [PATCH stable 6.1 1/1] selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link
> > test
>
> Thanks, but will this even build on 6.1? it depends on the get_time_ns()...
Oops, yes it is indeed failing. Will send v2. Sorry about this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-19 4:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-18 7:41 [PATCH stable 6.1 1/1] selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link test Shung-Hsi Yu
2026-06-19 4:07 ` Sasha Levin
2026-06-19 4:23 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox