* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
@ 2026-07-13 13:48 gregkh
2026-07-15 21:31 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 1/2] netfilter: ebtables: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-07-13 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fw; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x cbfe53599eebffd188938ab6774cc41794f6f9d5
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026071335-dolly-tinwork-7a6f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From cbfe53599eebffd188938ab6774cc41794f6f9d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 10:23:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array
sashiko reports:
looking at ebtables table
translation, could a sparse cpu_possible_mask lead to an uninitialized pointer
free?
If cpu_possible_mask is sparse (for example, CPU 0 and CPU 2 are possible,
but CPU 1 is not), the allocation loop skips CPU 1. If vmalloc_node() fails at
CPU 2, the cleanup loop will blindly decrement and call vfree() on
newinfo->chainstack[1].
Not a real-world bug, such allocation isn't expected to fail
in the first place.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index 5b74ff827493..48187598cdd0 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -921,8 +921,7 @@ static int translate_table(struct net *net, const char *name,
* if an error occurs
*/
newinfo->chainstack =
- vmalloc_array(nr_cpu_ids,
- sizeof(*(newinfo->chainstack)));
+ vcalloc(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(*(newinfo->chainstack)));
if (!newinfo->chainstack)
return -ENOMEM;
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5.10.y 1/2] netfilter: ebtables: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code 2026-07-13 13:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh @ 2026-07-15 21:31 ` Sasha Levin 2026-07-15 21:31 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 2/2] netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-15 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Qianfeng Rong, Florian Westphal, Sasha Levin From: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> [ Upstream commit 46015e6b3ea75297b28d4806564f3f692cf11861 ] Remove array_size() calls and replace vmalloc() with vmalloc_array() to simplify the code. vmalloc_array() is also optimized better, uses fewer instructions, and handles overflow more concisely[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/abc66ec5-85a4-47e1-9759-2f60ab111971@vivo.com/ Signed-off-by: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Stable-dep-of: cbfe53599eeb ("netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c index e86695f1ed95b6..075387678f8228 100644 --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c @@ -881,8 +881,8 @@ static int translate_table(struct net *net, const char *name, * if an error occurs */ newinfo->chainstack = - vmalloc(array_size(nr_cpu_ids, - sizeof(*(newinfo->chainstack)))); + vmalloc_array(nr_cpu_ids, + sizeof(*(newinfo->chainstack))); if (!newinfo->chainstack) return -ENOMEM; for_each_possible_cpu(i) { @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int translate_table(struct net *net, const char *name, } } - cl_s = vmalloc(array_size(udc_cnt, sizeof(*cl_s))); + cl_s = vmalloc_array(udc_cnt, sizeof(*cl_s)); if (!cl_s) return -ENOMEM; i = 0; /* the i'th udc */ @@ -977,8 +977,8 @@ static int do_replace_finish(struct net *net, struct ebt_replace *repl, * the check on the size is done later, when we have the lock */ if (repl->num_counters) { - unsigned long size = repl->num_counters * sizeof(*counterstmp); - counterstmp = vmalloc(size); + counterstmp = vmalloc_array(repl->num_counters, + sizeof(*counterstmp)); if (!counterstmp) return -ENOMEM; } @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static int do_update_counters(struct net *net, const char *name, if (num_counters == 0) return -EINVAL; - tmp = vmalloc(array_size(num_counters, sizeof(*tmp))); + tmp = vmalloc_array(num_counters, sizeof(*tmp)); if (!tmp) return -ENOMEM; @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ static int copy_counters_to_user(struct ebt_table *t, if (num_counters != nentries) return -EINVAL; - counterstmp = vmalloc(array_size(nentries, sizeof(*counterstmp))); + counterstmp = vmalloc_array(nentries, sizeof(*counterstmp)); if (!counterstmp) return -ENOMEM; -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5.10.y 2/2] netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array 2026-07-15 21:31 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 1/2] netfilter: ebtables: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-15 21:31 ` Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-15 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Florian Westphal, Sasha Levin From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> [ Upstream commit cbfe53599eebffd188938ab6774cc41794f6f9d5 ] sashiko reports: looking at ebtables table translation, could a sparse cpu_possible_mask lead to an uninitialized pointer free? If cpu_possible_mask is sparse (for example, CPU 0 and CPU 2 are possible, but CPU 1 is not), the allocation loop skips CPU 1. If vmalloc_node() fails at CPU 2, the cleanup loop will blindly decrement and call vfree() on newinfo->chainstack[1]. Not a real-world bug, such allocation isn't expected to fail in the first place. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c index 075387678f8228..355c11b4068374 100644 --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c @@ -881,8 +881,7 @@ static int translate_table(struct net *net, const char *name, * if an error occurs */ newinfo->chainstack = - vmalloc_array(nr_cpu_ids, - sizeof(*(newinfo->chainstack))); + vcalloc(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(*(newinfo->chainstack))); if (!newinfo->chainstack) return -ENOMEM; for_each_possible_cpu(i) { -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-15 21:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-07-13 13:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh 2026-07-15 21:31 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 1/2] netfilter: ebtables: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code Sasha Levin 2026-07-15 21:31 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 2/2] netfilter: ebtables: zero chainstack array Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox