From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:21:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716182158.920140-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026071446-twins-thumping-9247@gregkh>
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
[ Upstream commit e1b849cfa6b61f1c866a908c9e8dd9b5aaab820b ]
There can be multiple inode switch works that are trying to switch
inodes to / from the same wb. This can happen in particular if some
cgroup exits which owns many (thousands) inodes and we need to switch
them all. In this case several inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() instances will
be just spinning on the same wb->list_lock while only one of them makes
forward progress. This wastes CPU cycles and quickly leads to softlockup
reports and unusable system.
Instead of running several inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() instances in
parallel switching to the same wb and contending on wb->list_lock, run
just one work item per wb and manage a queue of isw items switching to
this wb.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Stable-dep-of: cba38ec4cbd3 ("writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h | 4 ++
include/linux/writeback.h | 2 +
mm/backing-dev.c | 5 ++
4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 0a36fc5e1bf2cd..f84bc8a5d9d0cc 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ static struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(struct inode *inode)
}
struct inode_switch_wbs_context {
- struct rcu_work work;
+ /* List of queued switching contexts for the wb */
+ struct llist_node list;
/*
* Multiple inodes can be switched at once. The switching procedure
@@ -353,7 +354,6 @@ struct inode_switch_wbs_context {
* array embedded into struct inode_switch_wbs_context. Otherwise
* an inode could be left in a non-consistent state.
*/
- struct bdi_writeback *new_wb;
struct inode *inodes[];
};
@@ -462,13 +462,11 @@ static bool inode_do_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode,
return switched;
}
-static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+static void process_inode_switch_wbs(struct bdi_writeback *new_wb,
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw)
{
- struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw =
- container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct inode_switch_wbs_context, work);
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(isw->inodes[0]);
struct bdi_writeback *old_wb = isw->inodes[0]->i_wb;
- struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = isw->new_wb;
unsigned long nr_switched = 0;
struct inode **inodep;
@@ -528,6 +526,38 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
}
+void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = container_of(work, struct bdi_writeback,
+ switch_work);
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw, *next_isw;
+ struct llist_node *list;
+
+ /*
+ * Grab out reference to wb so that it cannot get freed under us
+ * after we process all the isw items.
+ */
+ wb_get(new_wb);
+ while (1) {
+ list = llist_del_all(&new_wb->switch_wbs_ctxs);
+ /* Nothing to do? */
+ if (!list)
+ break;
+ /*
+ * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH
+ * tells the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
+ * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
+ * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be
+ * visible.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
+ llist_for_each_entry_safe(isw, next_isw, list, list)
+ process_inode_switch_wbs(new_wb, isw);
+ }
+ wb_put(new_wb);
+}
+
static bool inode_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode *inode,
struct bdi_writeback *new_wb)
{
@@ -557,6 +587,13 @@ static bool inode_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode *inode,
return true;
}
+static void wb_queue_isw(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw)
+{
+ if (llist_add(&isw->list, &wb->switch_wbs_ctxs))
+ queue_work(isw_wq, &wb->switch_work);
+}
+
/**
* inode_switch_wbs - change the wb association of an inode
* @inode: target inode
@@ -570,6 +607,7 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
struct cgroup_subsys_state *memcg_css;
struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw;
+ struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = NULL;
/* noop if seems to be already in progress */
if (inode->i_state & I_WB_SWITCH)
@@ -594,40 +632,34 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
if (!memcg_css)
goto out_free;
- isw->new_wb = wb_get_create(bdi, memcg_css, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ new_wb = wb_get_create(bdi, memcg_css, GFP_ATOMIC);
css_put(memcg_css);
- if (!isw->new_wb)
+ if (!new_wb)
goto out_free;
- if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, isw->new_wb))
+ if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, new_wb))
goto out_free;
isw->inodes[0] = inode;
- /*
- * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
- * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
- * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
- * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible.
- */
- INIT_RCU_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
- queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
+ wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
return;
out_free:
atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
- if (isw->new_wb)
- wb_put(isw->new_wb);
+ if (new_wb)
+ wb_put(new_wb);
kfree(isw);
}
-static bool isw_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw,
+static bool isw_prepare_wbs_switch(struct bdi_writeback *new_wb,
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw,
struct list_head *list, int *nr)
{
struct inode *inode;
list_for_each_entry(inode, list, i_io_list) {
- if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, isw->new_wb))
+ if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, new_wb))
continue;
isw->inodes[*nr] = inode;
@@ -651,6 +683,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *memcg_css;
struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw;
+ struct bdi_writeback *new_wb;
int nr;
bool restart = false;
@@ -663,12 +696,12 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
for (memcg_css = wb->memcg_css->parent; memcg_css;
memcg_css = memcg_css->parent) {
- isw->new_wb = wb_get_create(wb->bdi, memcg_css, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (isw->new_wb)
+ new_wb = wb_get_create(wb->bdi, memcg_css, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (new_wb)
break;
}
- if (unlikely(!isw->new_wb))
- isw->new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
+ if (unlikely(!new_wb))
+ new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
nr = 0;
spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
@@ -680,27 +713,21 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
* bandwidth restrictions, as writeback of inode metadata is not
* accounted for.
*/
- restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(isw, &wb->b_attached, &nr);
+ restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_attached, &nr);
if (!restart)
- restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(isw, &wb->b_dirty_time, &nr);
+ restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_dirty_time,
+ &nr);
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
/* no attached inodes? bail out */
if (nr == 0) {
atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
- wb_put(isw->new_wb);
+ wb_put(new_wb);
kfree(isw);
return restart;
}
- /*
- * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
- * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
- * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
- * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible.
- */
- INIT_RCU_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
- queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
+ wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
return restart;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
index ae12696ec492c6..2dd079bb15e494 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
@@ -154,6 +154,10 @@ struct bdi_writeback {
struct list_head blkcg_node; /* anchored at blkcg->cgwb_list */
struct list_head b_attached; /* attached inodes, protected by list_lock */
struct list_head offline_node; /* anchored at offline_cgwbs */
+ struct work_struct switch_work; /* work used to perform inode switching
+ * to this wb */
+ struct llist_head switch_wbs_ctxs; /* queued contexts for
+ * writeback switching */
union {
struct work_struct release_work;
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 06f9291b6fd512..897c6dd4cb2545 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ static inline void wbc_init_bio(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct bio *bio)
bio_associate_blkg_from_css(bio, wbc->wb->blkcg_css);
}
+void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work);
+
#else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
static inline void inode_attach_wb(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 593b829694a07f..2bddec6d79f98d 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ static void cgwb_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
wb_exit(wb);
bdi_put(bdi);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&wb->b_attached));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(work_pending(&wb->switch_work));
call_rcu(&wb->rcu, cgwb_free_rcu);
}
@@ -491,6 +492,8 @@ static int cgwb_create(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
wb->memcg_css = memcg_css;
wb->blkcg_css = blkcg_css;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_attached);
+ INIT_WORK(&wb->switch_work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
+ init_llist_head(&wb->switch_wbs_ctxs);
INIT_WORK(&wb->release_work, cgwb_release_workfn);
set_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state);
bdi_get(bdi);
@@ -624,6 +627,8 @@ static int cgwb_bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
if (!ret) {
bdi->wb.memcg_css = &root_mem_cgroup->css;
bdi->wb.blkcg_css = blkcg_root_css;
+ INIT_WORK(&bdi->wb.switch_work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
+ init_llist_head(&bdi->wb.switch_wbs_ctxs);
}
return ret;
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 14:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-16 18:21 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-07-16 18:21 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716182158.920140-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox