Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
@ 2026-07-14 14:48 gregkh
  2026-07-16 18:21 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-07-14 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: libaokun, brauner, jack, tj; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x cba38ec4cbd3a7b8b942a8d52531a05be8a9ff0d
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026071446-twins-thumping-9247@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' 'HEAD^..'

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From cba38ec4cbd3a7b8b942a8d52531a05be8a9ff0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 17:50:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and
 inode_switch_wbs()

When a container exits, the following BUG_ON() is occasionally triggered:

==================================================================
 VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb (ext4)
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 kernel BUG at fs/super.c:695!
 CPU: 3 PID: 6 Comm: containerd-shim Tainted: G OE K 6.6 #1
 pstate: 63400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
 pc : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100
 lr : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100
 Call trace:
  generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100
  kill_block_super+0x20/0x48
  ext4_kill_sb+0x28/0x60
  deactivate_locked_super+0x54/0x130
  deactivate_super+0x84/0xa0
  cleanup_mnt+0xa4/0x140
  __cleanup_mnt+0x18/0x28
  task_work_run+0x78/0xe0
  do_notify_resume+0x204/0x240
==================================================================

The root cause is a race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and
inode_switch_wbs()/cleanup_offline_cgwb(). There is a window between
inode_prepare_wbs_switch() returning true and the subsequent
wb_queue_isw() call. Following is the process that triggers the issue:

      CPU A (umount)           |          CPU B (writeback)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                 inode_switch_wbs/cleanup_offline_cgwb
                                  atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight)
                                  inode_prepare_wbs_switch
                                   -> passes SB_ACTIVE check
                                   __iget(inode)
 generic_shutdown_super
  sb->s_flags &= ~SB_ACTIVE
  cgroup_writeback_umount(sb)
   smp_mb()
   atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight)
   rcu_barrier()
    -> no pending RCU callbacks
   flush_workqueue(isw_wq)
    -> nothing queued, returns
  evict_inodes(sb)
   -> Inode skipped as isw still holds a ref.
  sop->put_super(sb)
   /* destroys percpu counters */
  -> VFS: Busy inodes after unmount!
                                  wb_queue_isw()
                                   queue_work(isw_wq, ...)
                                  /* later in work function */
                                  inode_switch_wbs_work_fn
                                   process_inode_switch_wbs
                                    iput() -> evict
                                     percpu_counter_dec() // UAF!

Fix this by extending the RCU read-side critical section in
inode_switch_wbs() and cleanup_offline_cgwb() to cover from
inode_prepare_wbs_switch() through wb_queue_isw().  Since there is
no sleep in this window, rcu_read_lock() can be used.  Then add a
synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount() before the existing
rcu_barrier(), so that all in-flight switchers that have passed the
SB_ACTIVE check have completed queue_work() before flush_workqueue()
is called.

The existing rcu_barrier() is intentionally retained so this fix can
be backported unchanged to stable kernels (5.10.y, 6.6.y, ...) that
still queue switches via queue_rcu_work(). It is a no-op on current
mainline (since commit e1b849cfa6b6 ("writeback: Avoid contention on
wb->list_lock when switching inodes")) and is removed in a follow-up
patch.

Fixes: a1a0e23e4903 ("writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches instead of pinning super_block")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/mxnjq2l6guusfchvauxr3v7c4bwjasybxlleqbbh4efloeqspz@iqylk76ohufz
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260521095016.2791354-2-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index a65694cbfe68..6766de9f9d75 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -660,12 +660,19 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 
 	atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 
-	/* find and pin the new wb */
+	/*
+	 * Paired with synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount():
+	 * holding rcu_read_lock across inode_prepare_wbs_switch()
+	 * (covering the SB_ACTIVE check and the inode grab) and
+	 * wb_queue_isw() ensures synchronize_rcu() cannot return until
+	 * the work is queued, so the subsequent flush_workqueue() will
+	 * wait for the switch.
+	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
+	/* find and pin the new wb */
 	memcg_css = css_from_id(new_wb_id, &memory_cgrp_subsys);
 	if (memcg_css && !css_tryget(memcg_css))
 		memcg_css = NULL;
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (!memcg_css)
 		goto out_free;
 
@@ -681,9 +688,11 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 
 	trace_inode_switch_wbs_queue(inode->i_wb, new_wb, 1);
 	wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return;
 
 out_free:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 	if (new_wb)
 		wb_put(new_wb);
@@ -741,6 +750,14 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 		new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
 
 	nr = 0;
+	/*
+	 * Paired with synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount().
+	 * Holding rcu_read_lock across the SB_ACTIVE check, the inode grab
+	 * and wb_queue_isw() ensures synchronize_rcu() cannot return until
+	 * the work is queued, so the subsequent flush_workqueue() will wait
+	 * for the switch.
+	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 	/*
 	 * In addition to the inodes that have completed writeback, also switch
@@ -758,6 +775,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 
 	/* no attached inodes? bail out */
 	if (nr == 0) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 		wb_put(new_wb);
 		kfree(isw);
@@ -766,6 +784,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 
 	trace_inode_switch_wbs_queue(wb, new_wb, nr);
 	wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return restart;
 }
@@ -1221,6 +1240,14 @@ void cgroup_writeback_umount(struct super_block *sb)
 	smp_mb();
 
 	if (atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight)) {
+		/*
+		 * Paired with rcu_read_lock() in inode_switch_wbs() and
+		 * cleanup_offline_cgwb().  synchronize_rcu() waits for any
+		 * in-flight switcher that already passed the SB_ACTIVE check
+		 * to finish queueing its work, so flush_workqueue() below
+		 * will then drain it.
+		 */
+		synchronize_rcu();
 		/*
 		 * Use rcu_barrier() to wait for all pending callbacks to
 		 * ensure that all in-flight wb switches are in the workqueue.


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes
  2026-07-14 14:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-07-16 18:21 ` Sasha Levin
  2026-07-16 18:21   ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-16 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Jan Kara, Tejun Heo, Sasha Levin

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

[ Upstream commit e1b849cfa6b61f1c866a908c9e8dd9b5aaab820b ]

There can be multiple inode switch works that are trying to switch
inodes to / from the same wb. This can happen in particular if some
cgroup exits which owns many (thousands) inodes and we need to switch
them all. In this case several inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() instances will
be just spinning on the same wb->list_lock while only one of them makes
forward progress. This wastes CPU cycles and quickly leads to softlockup
reports and unusable system.

Instead of running several inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() instances in
parallel switching to the same wb and contending on wb->list_lock, run
just one work item per wb and manage a queue of isw items switching to
this wb.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Stable-dep-of: cba38ec4cbd3 ("writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c                | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h |  4 ++
 include/linux/writeback.h        |  2 +
 mm/backing-dev.c                 |  5 ++
 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 0a36fc5e1bf2cd..f84bc8a5d9d0cc 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ static struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(struct inode *inode)
 }
 
 struct inode_switch_wbs_context {
-	struct rcu_work		work;
+	/* List of queued switching contexts for the wb */
+	struct llist_node	list;
 
 	/*
 	 * Multiple inodes can be switched at once.  The switching procedure
@@ -353,7 +354,6 @@ struct inode_switch_wbs_context {
 	 * array embedded into struct inode_switch_wbs_context.  Otherwise
 	 * an inode could be left in a non-consistent state.
 	 */
-	struct bdi_writeback	*new_wb;
 	struct inode		*inodes[];
 };
 
@@ -462,13 +462,11 @@ static bool inode_do_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode,
 	return switched;
 }
 
-static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+static void process_inode_switch_wbs(struct bdi_writeback *new_wb,
+				     struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw)
 {
-	struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw =
-		container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct inode_switch_wbs_context, work);
 	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(isw->inodes[0]);
 	struct bdi_writeback *old_wb = isw->inodes[0]->i_wb;
-	struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = isw->new_wb;
 	unsigned long nr_switched = 0;
 	struct inode **inodep;
 
@@ -528,6 +526,38 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 	atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 }
 
+void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = container_of(work, struct bdi_writeback,
+						    switch_work);
+	struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw, *next_isw;
+	struct llist_node *list;
+
+	/*
+	 * Grab out reference to wb so that it cannot get freed under us
+	 * after we process all the isw items.
+	 */
+	wb_get(new_wb);
+	while (1) {
+		list = llist_del_all(&new_wb->switch_wbs_ctxs);
+		/* Nothing to do? */
+		if (!list)
+			break;
+		/*
+		 * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH
+		 * tells the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
+		 * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
+		 * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be
+		 * visible.
+		 */
+		synchronize_rcu();
+
+		llist_for_each_entry_safe(isw, next_isw, list, list)
+			process_inode_switch_wbs(new_wb, isw);
+	}
+	wb_put(new_wb);
+}
+
 static bool inode_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode *inode,
 				     struct bdi_writeback *new_wb)
 {
@@ -557,6 +587,13 @@ static bool inode_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode *inode,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static void wb_queue_isw(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+			 struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw)
+{
+	if (llist_add(&isw->list, &wb->switch_wbs_ctxs))
+		queue_work(isw_wq, &wb->switch_work);
+}
+
 /**
  * inode_switch_wbs - change the wb association of an inode
  * @inode: target inode
@@ -570,6 +607,7 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
 	struct cgroup_subsys_state *memcg_css;
 	struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw;
+	struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = NULL;
 
 	/* noop if seems to be already in progress */
 	if (inode->i_state & I_WB_SWITCH)
@@ -594,40 +632,34 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 	if (!memcg_css)
 		goto out_free;
 
-	isw->new_wb = wb_get_create(bdi, memcg_css, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	new_wb = wb_get_create(bdi, memcg_css, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	css_put(memcg_css);
-	if (!isw->new_wb)
+	if (!new_wb)
 		goto out_free;
 
-	if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, isw->new_wb))
+	if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, new_wb))
 		goto out_free;
 
 	isw->inodes[0] = inode;
 
-	/*
-	 * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
-	 * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
-	 * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
-	 * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible.
-	 */
-	INIT_RCU_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
-	queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
+	wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
 	return;
 
 out_free:
 	atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
-	if (isw->new_wb)
-		wb_put(isw->new_wb);
+	if (new_wb)
+		wb_put(new_wb);
 	kfree(isw);
 }
 
-static bool isw_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw,
+static bool isw_prepare_wbs_switch(struct bdi_writeback *new_wb,
+				   struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw,
 				   struct list_head *list, int *nr)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(inode, list, i_io_list) {
-		if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, isw->new_wb))
+		if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, new_wb))
 			continue;
 
 		isw->inodes[*nr] = inode;
@@ -651,6 +683,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 {
 	struct cgroup_subsys_state *memcg_css;
 	struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw;
+	struct bdi_writeback *new_wb;
 	int nr;
 	bool restart = false;
 
@@ -663,12 +696,12 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 
 	for (memcg_css = wb->memcg_css->parent; memcg_css;
 	     memcg_css = memcg_css->parent) {
-		isw->new_wb = wb_get_create(wb->bdi, memcg_css, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (isw->new_wb)
+		new_wb = wb_get_create(wb->bdi, memcg_css, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (new_wb)
 			break;
 	}
-	if (unlikely(!isw->new_wb))
-		isw->new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
+	if (unlikely(!new_wb))
+		new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
 
 	nr = 0;
 	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
@@ -680,27 +713,21 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 	 * bandwidth restrictions, as writeback of inode metadata is not
 	 * accounted for.
 	 */
-	restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(isw, &wb->b_attached, &nr);
+	restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_attached, &nr);
 	if (!restart)
-		restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(isw, &wb->b_dirty_time, &nr);
+		restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_dirty_time,
+						 &nr);
 	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
 
 	/* no attached inodes? bail out */
 	if (nr == 0) {
 		atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
-		wb_put(isw->new_wb);
+		wb_put(new_wb);
 		kfree(isw);
 		return restart;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
-	 * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
-	 * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
-	 * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible.
-	 */
-	INIT_RCU_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
-	queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
+	wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
 
 	return restart;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
index ae12696ec492c6..2dd079bb15e494 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
@@ -154,6 +154,10 @@ struct bdi_writeback {
 	struct list_head blkcg_node;	/* anchored at blkcg->cgwb_list */
 	struct list_head b_attached;	/* attached inodes, protected by list_lock */
 	struct list_head offline_node;	/* anchored at offline_cgwbs */
+	struct work_struct switch_work;	/* work used to perform inode switching
+					 * to this wb */
+	struct llist_head switch_wbs_ctxs;	/* queued contexts for
+						 * writeback switching */
 
 	union {
 		struct work_struct release_work;
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 06f9291b6fd512..897c6dd4cb2545 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ static inline void wbc_init_bio(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct bio *bio)
 		bio_associate_blkg_from_css(bio, wbc->wb->blkcg_css);
 }
 
+void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work);
+
 #else	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
 
 static inline void inode_attach_wb(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 593b829694a07f..2bddec6d79f98d 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ static void cgwb_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
 	wb_exit(wb);
 	bdi_put(bdi);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&wb->b_attached));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(work_pending(&wb->switch_work));
 	call_rcu(&wb->rcu, cgwb_free_rcu);
 }
 
@@ -491,6 +492,8 @@ static int cgwb_create(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
 	wb->memcg_css = memcg_css;
 	wb->blkcg_css = blkcg_css;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_attached);
+	INIT_WORK(&wb->switch_work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
+	init_llist_head(&wb->switch_wbs_ctxs);
 	INIT_WORK(&wb->release_work, cgwb_release_workfn);
 	set_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state);
 	bdi_get(bdi);
@@ -624,6 +627,8 @@ static int cgwb_bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 	if (!ret) {
 		bdi->wb.memcg_css = &root_mem_cgroup->css;
 		bdi->wb.blkcg_css = blkcg_root_css;
+		INIT_WORK(&bdi->wb.switch_work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
+		init_llist_head(&bdi->wb.switch_wbs_ctxs);
 	}
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs()
  2026-07-16 18:21 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes Sasha Levin
@ 2026-07-16 18:21   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-16 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Baokun Li, Jan Kara, Tejun Heo, Christian Brauner (Amutable),
	Sasha Levin

From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit cba38ec4cbd3a7b8b942a8d52531a05be8a9ff0d ]

When a container exits, the following BUG_ON() is occasionally triggered:

==================================================================
 VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb (ext4)
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 kernel BUG at fs/super.c:695!
 CPU: 3 PID: 6 Comm: containerd-shim Tainted: G OE K 6.6 #1
 pstate: 63400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
 pc : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100
 lr : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100
 Call trace:
  generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100
  kill_block_super+0x20/0x48
  ext4_kill_sb+0x28/0x60
  deactivate_locked_super+0x54/0x130
  deactivate_super+0x84/0xa0
  cleanup_mnt+0xa4/0x140
  __cleanup_mnt+0x18/0x28
  task_work_run+0x78/0xe0
  do_notify_resume+0x204/0x240
==================================================================

The root cause is a race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and
inode_switch_wbs()/cleanup_offline_cgwb(). There is a window between
inode_prepare_wbs_switch() returning true and the subsequent
wb_queue_isw() call. Following is the process that triggers the issue:

      CPU A (umount)           |          CPU B (writeback)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                 inode_switch_wbs/cleanup_offline_cgwb
                                  atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight)
                                  inode_prepare_wbs_switch
                                   -> passes SB_ACTIVE check
                                   __iget(inode)
 generic_shutdown_super
  sb->s_flags &= ~SB_ACTIVE
  cgroup_writeback_umount(sb)
   smp_mb()
   atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight)
   rcu_barrier()
    -> no pending RCU callbacks
   flush_workqueue(isw_wq)
    -> nothing queued, returns
  evict_inodes(sb)
   -> Inode skipped as isw still holds a ref.
  sop->put_super(sb)
   /* destroys percpu counters */
  -> VFS: Busy inodes after unmount!
                                  wb_queue_isw()
                                   queue_work(isw_wq, ...)
                                  /* later in work function */
                                  inode_switch_wbs_work_fn
                                   process_inode_switch_wbs
                                    iput() -> evict
                                     percpu_counter_dec() // UAF!

Fix this by extending the RCU read-side critical section in
inode_switch_wbs() and cleanup_offline_cgwb() to cover from
inode_prepare_wbs_switch() through wb_queue_isw().  Since there is
no sleep in this window, rcu_read_lock() can be used.  Then add a
synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount() before the existing
rcu_barrier(), so that all in-flight switchers that have passed the
SB_ACTIVE check have completed queue_work() before flush_workqueue()
is called.

The existing rcu_barrier() is intentionally retained so this fix can
be backported unchanged to stable kernels (5.10.y, 6.6.y, ...) that
still queue switches via queue_rcu_work(). It is a no-op on current
mainline (since commit e1b849cfa6b6 ("writeback: Avoid contention on
wb->list_lock when switching inodes")) and is removed in a follow-up
patch.

Fixes: a1a0e23e4903 ("writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches instead of pinning super_block")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/mxnjq2l6guusfchvauxr3v7c4bwjasybxlleqbbh4efloeqspz@iqylk76ohufz
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260521095016.2791354-2-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index f84bc8a5d9d0cc..650ca25bc274c9 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -623,12 +623,19 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 
 	atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 
-	/* find and pin the new wb */
+	/*
+	 * Paired with synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount():
+	 * holding rcu_read_lock across inode_prepare_wbs_switch()
+	 * (covering the SB_ACTIVE check and the inode grab) and
+	 * wb_queue_isw() ensures synchronize_rcu() cannot return until
+	 * the work is queued, so the subsequent flush_workqueue() will
+	 * wait for the switch.
+	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
+	/* find and pin the new wb */
 	memcg_css = css_from_id(new_wb_id, &memory_cgrp_subsys);
 	if (memcg_css && !css_tryget(memcg_css))
 		memcg_css = NULL;
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (!memcg_css)
 		goto out_free;
 
@@ -643,9 +650,11 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
 	isw->inodes[0] = inode;
 
 	wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return;
 
 out_free:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 	if (new_wb)
 		wb_put(new_wb);
@@ -704,6 +713,14 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 		new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
 
 	nr = 0;
+	/*
+	 * Paired with synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount().
+	 * Holding rcu_read_lock across the SB_ACTIVE check, the inode grab
+	 * and wb_queue_isw() ensures synchronize_rcu() cannot return until
+	 * the work is queued, so the subsequent flush_workqueue() will wait
+	 * for the switch.
+	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 	/*
 	 * In addition to the inodes that have completed writeback, also switch
@@ -721,6 +738,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 
 	/* no attached inodes? bail out */
 	if (nr == 0) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 		wb_put(new_wb);
 		kfree(isw);
@@ -728,6 +746,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 	}
 
 	wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return restart;
 }
@@ -1158,6 +1177,14 @@ void cgroup_writeback_umount(void)
 	smp_mb();
 
 	if (atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight)) {
+		/*
+		 * Paired with rcu_read_lock() in inode_switch_wbs() and
+		 * cleanup_offline_cgwb().  synchronize_rcu() waits for any
+		 * in-flight switcher that already passed the SB_ACTIVE check
+		 * to finish queueing its work, so flush_workqueue() below
+		 * will then drain it.
+		 */
+		synchronize_rcu();
 		/*
 		 * Use rcu_barrier() to wait for all pending callbacks to
 		 * ensure that all in-flight wb switches are in the workqueue.
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-16 18:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-14 14:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-16 18:21 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes Sasha Levin
2026-07-16 18:21   ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] writeback: fix race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs() Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox