* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
@ 2026-07-16 5:08 gregkh
2026-07-21 15:48 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-07-16 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mattbobrowski, ameryhung, awo, daniel, emil; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x a6f0643e4f63cfaa0d5d4a69de4f132eac4b8fe4
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026071659-phobia-custard-5548@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a6f0643e4f63cfaa0d5d4a69de4f132eac4b8fe4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2026 20:11:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is
uninitialized
When CONFIG_BPF_LSM=y is set, BPF inode storage maps
(BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE) are compiled into the kernel. However,
if the BPF LSM is not explicitly enabled at boot time (e.g. omitted
from the "lsm=" boot parameter), lsm_prepare() is never executed for
the BPF LSM.
Consequently, the BPF inode security blob offset
(bpf_lsm_blob_sizes.lbs_inode) is never initialized and remains at
its default compiled size of 8 bytes instead of being updated to a
valid offset past the reserved struct rcu_head (typically 16 bytes
or more).
When a privileged user creates and updates a BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE
map, bpf_inode() evaluates inode->i_security + 8. This erroneously
aliases the struct rcu_head.func callback pointer at the beginning
of the inode->i_security blob. During subsequent map element cleanup
or inode destruction, writing NULL to owner_storage clears the queued
RCU callback pointer. When rcu_do_batch() later executes the queued
callback, it attempts an instruction fetch at address 0x0, triggering
an immediate kernel panic.
Fix this by introducing a global bpf_lsm_initialized boolean flag
marked with __ro_after_init. Set this flag to true inside bpf_lsm_init()
when the LSM framework successfully registers the BPF LSM. Gate map
allocation in inode_storage_map_alloc() on this flag, returning
-EOPNOTSUPP if the BPF LSM is in turn uninitialized.
This fail-fast approach prevents userspace from allocating inode
storage maps when the supporting BPF LSM infrastructure is absent,
avoiding zombie map states.
Fixes: 8ea636848aca ("bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes")
Reported-by: oxsignal <awo@kakao.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Reviewed-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260628201103.3624525-1-mattbobrowski@google.com
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
index 143775a27a2a..dda272d78f01 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
+extern bool bpf_lsm_initialized __ro_after_init;
+
#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
RET bpf_lsm_##NAME(__VA_ARGS__);
#include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
@@ -56,6 +58,8 @@ bool bpf_lsm_hook_returns_errno(u32 btf_id);
#else /* !CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
+#define bpf_lsm_initialized false
+
static inline bool bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(u32 btf_id)
{
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
index 0da8d923e39d..f9e81060c1f4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
@@ -178,6 +178,15 @@ static int notsupp_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
static struct bpf_map *inode_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
+ /*
+ * Do not allow allocation of BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE if the BPF LSM
+ * was not initialized by the LSM framework at boot. Without proper
+ * initialization, the BPF inode security blob offset remains unprepared,
+ * causing bpf_inode() to calculate an invalid memory offset and corrupt
+ * inode->i_security.
+ */
+ if (!bpf_lsm_initialized)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
return bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(attr, &inode_cache);
}
diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
index 40efde233f3a..7b98f5d1e2be 100644
--- a/security/bpf/hooks.c
+++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
+bool bpf_lsm_initialized __ro_after_init;
+
static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
LSM_HOOK_INIT(NAME, bpf_lsm_##NAME),
@@ -24,6 +26,7 @@ static int __init bpf_lsm_init(void)
{
security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks),
&bpf_lsmid);
+ bpf_lsm_initialized = true;
pr_info("LSM support for eBPF active\n");
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6.6.y] bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized
2026-07-16 5:08 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-07-21 15:48 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-21 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Matt Bobrowski, oxsignal, Daniel Borkmann, Emil Tsalapatis,
Amery Hung, Sasha Levin
From: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
[ Upstream commit a6f0643e4f63cfaa0d5d4a69de4f132eac4b8fe4 ]
When CONFIG_BPF_LSM=y is set, BPF inode storage maps
(BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE) are compiled into the kernel. However,
if the BPF LSM is not explicitly enabled at boot time (e.g. omitted
from the "lsm=" boot parameter), lsm_prepare() is never executed for
the BPF LSM.
Consequently, the BPF inode security blob offset
(bpf_lsm_blob_sizes.lbs_inode) is never initialized and remains at
its default compiled size of 8 bytes instead of being updated to a
valid offset past the reserved struct rcu_head (typically 16 bytes
or more).
When a privileged user creates and updates a BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE
map, bpf_inode() evaluates inode->i_security + 8. This erroneously
aliases the struct rcu_head.func callback pointer at the beginning
of the inode->i_security blob. During subsequent map element cleanup
or inode destruction, writing NULL to owner_storage clears the queued
RCU callback pointer. When rcu_do_batch() later executes the queued
callback, it attempts an instruction fetch at address 0x0, triggering
an immediate kernel panic.
Fix this by introducing a global bpf_lsm_initialized boolean flag
marked with __ro_after_init. Set this flag to true inside bpf_lsm_init()
when the LSM framework successfully registers the BPF LSM. Gate map
allocation in inode_storage_map_alloc() on this flag, returning
-EOPNOTSUPP if the BPF LSM is in turn uninitialized.
This fail-fast approach prevents userspace from allocating inode
storage maps when the supporting BPF LSM infrastructure is absent,
avoiding zombie map states.
Fixes: 8ea636848aca ("bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes")
Reported-by: oxsignal <awo@kakao.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Reviewed-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260628201103.3624525-1-mattbobrowski@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 4 ++++
kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c | 9 +++++++++
security/bpf/hooks.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
index 1de7ece5d36d43..4f962dccc6c500 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
+extern bool bpf_lsm_initialized __ro_after_init;
+
#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
RET bpf_lsm_##NAME(__VA_ARGS__);
#include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
@@ -47,6 +49,8 @@ void bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog, bpf_func_t *bpf_func)
#else /* !CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
+#define bpf_lsm_initialized false
+
static inline bool bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(u32 btf_id)
{
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
index b0ef45db207c89..288d776f2d4872 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c
@@ -191,6 +191,15 @@ static int notsupp_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
static struct bpf_map *inode_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
+ /*
+ * Do not allow allocation of BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE if the BPF LSM
+ * was not initialized by the LSM framework at boot. Without proper
+ * initialization, the BPF inode security blob offset remains unprepared,
+ * causing bpf_inode() to calculate an invalid memory offset and corrupt
+ * inode->i_security.
+ */
+ if (!bpf_lsm_initialized)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
return bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(attr, &inode_cache, false);
}
diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
index 35933ae53b92cf..2e9c247c3a6327 100644
--- a/security/bpf/hooks.c
+++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
+bool bpf_lsm_initialized __ro_after_init;
+
static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \
LSM_HOOK_INIT(NAME, bpf_lsm_##NAME),
@@ -18,6 +20,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
static int __init bpf_lsm_init(void)
{
security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks), "bpf");
+ bpf_lsm_initialized = true;
pr_info("LSM support for eBPF active\n");
return 0;
}
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-21 15:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-16 5:08 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-21 15:48 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox