Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
@ 2026-07-20 14:29 gregkh
  2026-07-22 11:01 ` [PATCH 6.12.y] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race Kiryl Shutsemau
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-07-20 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kas, akpm, balbirs, david, dev.jain, ljs, mhocko, peterx, rppt,
	sashiko-bot, stable, surenb, vbabka
  Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 04718f7c9290f95385f0dd328758753dc1c36dec
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026072036-corsage-untracked-8fee@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' 'HEAD^..'

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 04718f7c9290f95385f0dd328758753dc1c36dec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 18:23:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update
 race

Patch series "userfaultfd/pagemap: pre-existing fixes".

These are pre-existing bug fixes that were carried at the front of the
userfaultfd RWP working-set-tracking series up to v5 [1].  Per review
feedback that fixes should not sit in the middle of a feature series, they
are split out and sent on their own; the RWP series is reposted rebased on
top of this.

All six were flagged by the Sashiko AI review of the RWP series and carry
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>.  They are
independent of RWP, apply to mm-new directly, and carry Cc: stable@.

  1: fs/proc/task_mmu: a missing huge_ptep_modify_prot_start() in
     make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() can lose hardware Dirty/Accessed updates
     when PAGEMAP_SCAN write-protects a hugetlb PTE.

  2: fs/proc/task_mmu: pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry() compares the range
     against HPAGE_SIZE rather than the hstate page size, so it never
     write-protects gigantic hugetlb pages.

  3: fs/proc/task_mmu: PAGEMAP_SCAN with PM_SCAN_WP_MATCHING over an
     unpopulated hugetlb range self-deadlocks -- pagemap_scan_pte_hole()
     calls uffd_wp_range() while walk_hugetlb_range() holds the hugetlb
     vma lock for read, and hugetlb_change_protection() then takes it
     for write. Install the marker inline instead.

  4: mm/huge_memory: change_non_present_huge_pmd() drops pmd_swp_uffd_wp
     on a device-private PMD permission downgrade, silently losing the
     uffd-wp marker.

  5: userfaultfd: must_wait() applies pte_write() to a locklessly read
     PTE without checking pte_present(), so swap/migration entries
     decode random offset bits and a thread can stay parked on a stale
     fault.

  6: userfaultfd: __VMA_UFFD_FLAGS feeds VMA_UFFD_MINOR_BIT (41) to
     mk_vma_flags() unconditionally, an out-of-bounds write into the
     single-word vma_flags_t on 32-bit. Build the mask from config-gated
     per-mode masks so an unavailable bit is never materialised.


This patch (of 6):

make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() arms the UFFD_WP bit on a present HugeTLB PTE by
calling huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() with a ptent snapshot that was
fetched without the corresponding huge_ptep_modify_prot_start().  The
start helper is what atomically clears the entry so the kernel-owned
snapshot stays consistent until the commit; without it, the hardware may
set Dirty or Accessed in the live PTE between the original read and the
commit, and huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() (whose generic implementation
just calls set_huge_pte_at()) then writes the stale snapshot back over the
live hardware bits, losing the update.

The non-hugetlb sibling make_uffd_wp_pte() does this correctly via
ptep_modify_prot_start() / ptep_modify_prot_commit().  Mirror that pattern
for the present-PTE branch.  The migration case stays as-is -- migration
entries are non-present, so there's no hardware update to race against.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260529172331.356655-1-kas@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260529172331.356655-2-kas@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260526130509.2748441-1-kirill@shutemov.name/ [1]
Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 1e3a15bf46f4..e21a38ac745b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -2610,12 +2610,16 @@ static void make_uffd_wp_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (softleaf_is_hwpoison(entry) || softleaf_is_marker(entry))
 		return;
 
-	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry))
+	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
 		set_huge_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep,
 				pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(ptent), psize);
-	else
-		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, ptent,
-					     huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(ptent));
+	} else {
+		pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
+
+		old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
+		new_pte = huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(old_pte);
+		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, old_pte, new_pte);
+	}
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
 


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.12.y] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race
  2026-07-20 14:29 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-07-22 11:01 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
  2026-07-24 11:22   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kiryl Shutsemau @ 2026-07-22 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable

From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>

Patch series "userfaultfd/pagemap: pre-existing fixes".

These are pre-existing bug fixes that were carried at the front of the
userfaultfd RWP working-set-tracking series up to v5 [1].  Per review
feedback that fixes should not sit in the middle of a feature series, they
are split out and sent on their own; the RWP series is reposted rebased on
top of this.

All six were flagged by the Sashiko AI review of the RWP series and carry
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>.  They are
independent of RWP, apply to mm-new directly, and carry Cc: stable@.

  1: fs/proc/task_mmu: a missing huge_ptep_modify_prot_start() in
     make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() can lose hardware Dirty/Accessed updates
     when PAGEMAP_SCAN write-protects a hugetlb PTE.

  2: fs/proc/task_mmu: pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry() compares the range
     against HPAGE_SIZE rather than the hstate page size, so it never
     write-protects gigantic hugetlb pages.

  3: fs/proc/task_mmu: PAGEMAP_SCAN with PM_SCAN_WP_MATCHING over an
     unpopulated hugetlb range self-deadlocks -- pagemap_scan_pte_hole()
     calls uffd_wp_range() while walk_hugetlb_range() holds the hugetlb
     vma lock for read, and hugetlb_change_protection() then takes it
     for write. Install the marker inline instead.

  4: mm/huge_memory: change_non_present_huge_pmd() drops pmd_swp_uffd_wp
     on a device-private PMD permission downgrade, silently losing the
     uffd-wp marker.

  5: userfaultfd: must_wait() applies pte_write() to a locklessly read
     PTE without checking pte_present(), so swap/migration entries
     decode random offset bits and a thread can stay parked on a stale
     fault.

  6: userfaultfd: __VMA_UFFD_FLAGS feeds VMA_UFFD_MINOR_BIT (41) to
     mk_vma_flags() unconditionally, an out-of-bounds write into the
     single-word vma_flags_t on 32-bit. Build the mask from config-gated
     per-mode masks so an unavailable bit is never materialised.

This patch (of 6):

make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() arms the UFFD_WP bit on a present HugeTLB PTE by
calling huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() with a ptent snapshot that was
fetched without the corresponding huge_ptep_modify_prot_start().  The
start helper is what atomically clears the entry so the kernel-owned
snapshot stays consistent until the commit; without it, the hardware may
set Dirty or Accessed in the live PTE between the original read and the
commit, and huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() (whose generic implementation
just calls set_huge_pte_at()) then writes the stale snapshot back over the
live hardware bits, losing the update.

The non-hugetlb sibling make_uffd_wp_pte() does this correctly via
ptep_modify_prot_start() / ptep_modify_prot_commit().  Mirror that pattern
for the present-PTE branch.  The migration case stays as-is -- migration
entries are non-present, so there's no hardware update to race against.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260529172331.356655-1-kas@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260529172331.356655-2-kas@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260526130509.2748441-1-kirill@shutemov.name/ [1]
Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 04718f7c9290f95385f0dd328758753dc1c36dec)
[ kas: adapt to the pre-softleaf idiom; apply the
  huge_ptep_modify_prot_start()/commit() fix to the present-PTE
  (!huge_pte_none()) branch ]
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index fb01a071b83d..9e0cdae64f2f 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -2254,15 +2254,19 @@ static void make_uffd_wp_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	psize = huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma));
 
-	if (is_hugetlb_entry_migration(ptent))
+	if (is_hugetlb_entry_migration(ptent)) {
 		set_huge_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep,
 				pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(ptent), psize);
-	else if (!huge_pte_none(ptent))
-		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, ptent,
-					     huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(ptent));
-	else
+	} else if (!huge_pte_none(ptent)) {
+		pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
+
+		old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
+		new_pte = huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(old_pte);
+		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, old_pte, new_pte);
+	} else {
 		set_huge_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep,
 				make_pte_marker(PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP), psize);
+	}
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
 
-- 
2.54.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race
  2026-07-22 11:01 ` [PATCH 6.12.y] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race Kiryl Shutsemau
@ 2026-07-24 11:22   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-07-24 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Sasha Levin, Kiryl Shutsemau

> fs/proc/task_mmu: a missing huge_ptep_modify_prot_start() in
> make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() can lose hardware Dirty/Accessed updates
> when PAGEMAP_SCAN write-protects a hugetlb PTE.

Queued for 6.12, thanks.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-24 11:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-20 14:29 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-22 11:01 ` [PATCH 6.12.y] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-07-24 11:22   ` Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox