[PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Fix life cycle of the nested_mmus array

[PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Fix life cycle of the nested_mmus array

[Marc Zyngier]

The nested_mmus array holds the shadow page tables that are used when
a guest is running a nested context. These structures are allocated on
VCPU_INIT for whole guest, which implies that they may have to be
relocated as the array grows.

Should a VCPU_INIT occur whilst a vcpu is actively running an L2 and
that the allocation requires relocation, that vcpu will still be
running with a pointer to the previous structure, which will have been
freed.

Fix this by turning the array of structures to an array of pointers,
which is now allocated at VM creation, sized to the absolute maximum
that KVM can handle.

In turn, each VCPU_INIT contributes S2_MMU_PER_VCPU to the pool. No
reallocation is ever performed, and the life cycle of each object is
much clearer:

- the nested_mmus array is allocated in kvm_init_nested(), and freed
  in kvm_arch_destroy_vm()

- s2_mmu structures are allocated in kvm_vcpu_init_nested(), and freed
  on kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all()

Finally, the freeing of vcpu->arch.vncr_array is made consistent
rather than being done on some failure paths, but not others.

Fixes: 4f128f8e1aaa ("KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures")
Reported-by: Shen Yongchao <grayhat@foxmail.com>
Reported-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260803224405.41468-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                |  8 ++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 93 +++++++++++++----------------
 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 108966a9db12b..08b2f24dc3c79 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
 	 * Stage 2 paging state for VMs with nested S2 using a virtual
 	 * VMID.
 	 */
-	struct kvm_s2_mmu *nested_mmus;
+	struct kvm_s2_mmu **nested_mmus;
 	size_t nested_mmus_size;
 	int nested_mmus_next;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
index 1ed7083358096..5b8edb2e8a87d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline u64 translate_ttbr0_el2_to_ttbr0_el1(u64 ttbr0)
 
 extern bool forward_smc_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 extern bool forward_debug_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-extern void kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
+extern int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
 extern int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 extern void kvm_init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
 extern struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 50adfff75be82..7607173c1a40c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -223,8 +223,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 #endif
 
-	kvm_init_nested(kvm);
-
 	ret = kvm_share_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -239,6 +237,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_free_cpumask;
 
+	ret = kvm_init_nested(kvm);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_uninit_mmu;
+
 	if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
 		/*
 		 * If any failures occur after this is successful, make sure to
@@ -267,6 +269,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 
 err_uninit_mmu:
 	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
+	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
 err_free_cpumask:
 	free_cpumask_var(kvm->arch.supported_cpus);
 err_unshare_kvm:
@@ -324,6 +327,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	kvm_unshare_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
 
+	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
 	kvm_arm_teardown_hypercalls(kvm);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 20af94197a8a7..254cbd8703b3d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -44,11 +44,15 @@ struct vncr_tlb {
  */
 #define S2_MMU_PER_VCPU		2
 
-void kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
+int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
+	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = kvmalloc_array(KVM_MAX_VCPUS * S2_MMU_PER_VCPU,
+					       sizeof(struct s2_mmu *),
+					       GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
 	atomic_set(&kvm->arch.vncr_tlb_count, 0);
+
+	return kvm->arch.nested_mmus ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
 }
 
 static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
@@ -69,8 +73,9 @@ static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
-	struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
-	int num_mmus, ret = 0;
+	int num_mmus;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
 
 	if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0, kvm->arch.vcpu_features) &&
 	    !cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCR_NV1))
@@ -83,51 +88,40 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	/*
-	 * Let's treat memory allocation failures as benign: If we fail to
-	 * allocate anything, return an error and keep the allocated array
-	 * alive. Userspace may try to recover by initializing the vcpu
-	 * again, and there is no reason to affect the whole VM for this.
-	 */
 	num_mmus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) * S2_MMU_PER_VCPU;
 
 	if (num_mmus > kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size) {
-		tmp = kvcalloc(num_mmus, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
+		int i, ret = 0;
+
+		tmp = kvcalloc(S2_MMU_PER_VCPU, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 		if (!tmp)
-			return -ENOMEM;
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
 
-		write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
-		if (kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size) {
-			memcpy(tmp, kvm->arch.nested_mmus,
-			       size_mul(sizeof(*tmp), kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size));
-
-			for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++)
-				tmp[i].pgt->mmu = &tmp[i];
+		for (i = 0; !ret && i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++) {
+			ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &tmp[i]);
+			if (ret)
+				break;
 		}
 
-		swap(kvm->arch.nested_mmus, tmp);
+		if (ret) {
+			while (--i >= 0)
+				kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&tmp[i]);
 
-		write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+			kvfree(tmp);
+			free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array);
+			vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array = NULL;
+			return ret;
+		}
+		
+		guard(write_lock)(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
-		kvfree(tmp);
+		for (i = 0; i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
+			kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i + kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size] = &tmp[i];
+
+		kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size += S2_MMU_PER_VCPU;
 	}
 
-	for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; !ret && i < num_mmus; i++)
-		ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
-
-	if (ret) {
-		for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i < num_mmus; i++)
-			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
-
-		free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array);
-		vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array = NULL;
-
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = num_mmus;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -741,7 +735,7 @@ void kvm_s2_mmu_iterate_by_vmid(struct kvm *kvm, u16 vmid,
 	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
 	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
 
 		if (!kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
 			continue;
@@ -783,7 +777,7 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 *   if S2 translation is disabled.
 	 */
 	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
 
 		if (!kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
 			continue;
@@ -822,7 +816,7 @@ static struct kvm_s2_mmu *get_s2_mmu_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	for (i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_next;
 	     i < (kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size + kvm->arch.nested_mmus_next);
 	     i++) {
-		s2_mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i % kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size];
+		s2_mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i % kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size];
 
 		if (atomic_read(&s2_mmu->refcnt) == 0)
 			break;
@@ -1269,7 +1263,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_wp(struct kvm *kvm)
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
 
 		if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
 			kvm_stage2_wp_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu));
@@ -1288,7 +1282,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm *kvm, bool may_block)
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
 
 		if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
 			kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu), may_block);
@@ -1307,7 +1301,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
 
 		if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
 			kvm_stage2_flush_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu));
@@ -1316,16 +1310,15 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
+	for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
 
 		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
 			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
+
+		if ((i % S2_MMU_PER_VCPU) == 0)
+			kvfree(mmu);
 	}
-	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
-	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
 	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
 	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
 }
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Fix life cycle of the nested_mmus array

[Karl Mehltretter]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:32:29AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
> +	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = kvmalloc_array(KVM_MAX_VCPUS * S2_MMU_PER_VCPU,
> +					       sizeof(struct s2_mmu *),
> +					       GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);

better: sizeof(struct kvm_s2_mmu *) or sizeof(*kvm->arch.nested_mmus) 

> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		
> +		guard(write_lock)(&kvm->mmu_lock);

tabs in the empty line.

Thanks,
Karl

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Fix life cycle of the nested_mmus array

[Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:32:29AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The nested_mmus array holds the shadow page tables that are used when
> a guest is running a nested context. These structures are allocated on
> VCPU_INIT for whole guest, which implies that they may have to be
> relocated as the array grows.
>
> Should a VCPU_INIT occur whilst a vcpu is actively running an L2 and
> that the allocation requires relocation, that vcpu will still be
> running with a pointer to the previous structure, which will have been
> freed.
>
> Fix this by turning the array of structures to an array of pointers,
> which is now allocated at VM creation, sized to the absolute maximum
> that KVM can handle.
>
> In turn, each VCPU_INIT contributes S2_MMU_PER_VCPU to the pool. No
> reallocation is ever performed, and the life cycle of each object is
> much clearer:
>
> - the nested_mmus array is allocated in kvm_init_nested(), and freed
>   in kvm_arch_destroy_vm()
>
> - s2_mmu structures are allocated in kvm_vcpu_init_nested(), and freed
>   on kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all()
>
> Finally, the freeing of vcpu->arch.vncr_array is made consistent
> rather than being done on some failure paths, but not others.
>
> Fixes: 4f128f8e1aaa ("KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures")
> Reported-by: Shen Yongchao <grayhat@foxmail.com>
> Reported-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260803224405.41468-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

One issue with a typo'd type below (the compiler is ok with it because it's
expressed as a sizeof(ptr) but it should be fixed) and a small nit, and
also Wei Lin had a comment re: the commit message.

With those addressed LGTM so:

Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>

> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                |  8 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 93 +++++++++++++----------------
>  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 108966a9db12b..08b2f24dc3c79 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>  	 * Stage 2 paging state for VMs with nested S2 using a virtual
>  	 * VMID.
>  	 */
> -	struct kvm_s2_mmu *nested_mmus;
> +	struct kvm_s2_mmu **nested_mmus;

OK I see, rather than having to deal with the dynamic array-type stuff and all
the mess that comes with that, just allocate at S2_MMU_PER_VCPU granularity,
i.e. the amount that can be expanded at any time.

>  	size_t nested_mmus_size;
>  	int nested_mmus_next;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> index 1ed7083358096..5b8edb2e8a87d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline u64 translate_ttbr0_el2_to_ttbr0_el1(u64 ttbr0)
>
>  extern bool forward_smc_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern bool forward_debug_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -extern void kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
> +extern int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
>  extern int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern void kvm_init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
>  extern struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 50adfff75be82..7607173c1a40c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -223,8 +223,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>  #endif
>
> -	kvm_init_nested(kvm);
> -
>  	ret = kvm_share_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -239,6 +237,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_free_cpumask;
>
> +	ret = kvm_init_nested(kvm);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_uninit_mmu;
> +
>  	if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If any failures occur after this is successful, make sure to
> @@ -267,6 +269,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>
>  err_uninit_mmu:
>  	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
> +	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
>  err_free_cpumask:
>  	free_cpumask_var(kvm->arch.supported_cpus);
>  err_unshare_kvm:
> @@ -324,6 +327,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>
>  	kvm_unshare_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
>
> +	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
>  	kvm_arm_teardown_hypercalls(kvm);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index 20af94197a8a7..254cbd8703b3d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -44,11 +44,15 @@ struct vncr_tlb {
>   */
>  #define S2_MMU_PER_VCPU		2
>
> -void kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
> +int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
> +	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = kvmalloc_array(KVM_MAX_VCPUS * S2_MMU_PER_VCPU,
> +					       sizeof(struct s2_mmu *),

As pointed out by Sashiko/Karl this seems to be a typo, should be kvm_s2_mmu?

> +					       GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>  	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
>  	atomic_set(&kvm->arch.vncr_tlb_count, 0);
> +
> +	return kvm->arch.nested_mmus ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
>  }
>
>  static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
> @@ -69,8 +73,9 @@ static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> -	struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
> -	int num_mmus, ret = 0;
> +	int num_mmus;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
>
>  	if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0, kvm->arch.vcpu_features) &&
>  	    !cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCR_NV1))
> @@ -83,51 +88,40 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	if (!vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> -	/*
> -	 * Let's treat memory allocation failures as benign: If we fail to
> -	 * allocate anything, return an error and keep the allocated array
> -	 * alive. Userspace may try to recover by initializing the vcpu
> -	 * again, and there is no reason to affect the whole VM for this.
> -	 */
>  	num_mmus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) * S2_MMU_PER_VCPU;
>
>  	if (num_mmus > kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size) {

I guess this can only ever be kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size + S2_MMU_PER_VCPU?

Maybe worth an assert if so? But not sure how useful it'd be in practice.

> -		tmp = kvcalloc(num_mmus, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
> +		int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +		tmp = kvcalloc(S2_MMU_PER_VCPU, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>  		if (!tmp)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> -		write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

Nice to do more stuff outside of the lock.

> -
> -		if (kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size) {
> -			memcpy(tmp, kvm->arch.nested_mmus,
> -			       size_mul(sizeof(*tmp), kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size));
> -
> -			for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++)
> -				tmp[i].pgt->mmu = &tmp[i];
> +		for (i = 0; !ret && i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++) {
> +			ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &tmp[i]);
> +			if (ret)
> +				break;

This seems to make the !ret above redundant so maybe:

		for (i = 0; !ret && i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
			ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &tmp[i]);

Or:

		for (i = 0; i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++) {
			ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &tmp[i]);
			if (ret)
				break;
		}

Which seems a bit clearer.

>  		}
>
> -		swap(kvm->arch.nested_mmus, tmp);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			while (--i >= 0)
> +				kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&tmp[i]);
>
> -		write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +			kvfree(tmp);
> +			free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array);
> +			vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array = NULL;
> +			return ret;

I seem to remember from my explorations of this that there are some ways in
which can get referenced by someone, but again I think you fix all this in 2/2
anyway.

> +		}
> +
> +		guard(write_lock)(&kvm->mmu_lock);

This guard does make it much neater :)

>
> -		kvfree(tmp);
> +		for (i = 0; i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
> +			kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i + kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size] = &tmp[i];
> +
> +		kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size += S2_MMU_PER_VCPU;
>  	}
>
> -	for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; !ret && i < num_mmus; i++)
> -		ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
> -
> -	if (ret) {
> -		for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i < num_mmus; i++)
> -			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
> -
> -		free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array);
> -		vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array = NULL;
> -
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -
> -	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = num_mmus;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -741,7 +735,7 @@ void kvm_s2_mmu_iterate_by_vmid(struct kvm *kvm, u16 vmid,
>  	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
>  	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
>  		if (!kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
>  			continue;
> @@ -783,7 +777,7 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 *   if S2 translation is disabled.
>  	 */
>  	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
>  		if (!kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
>  			continue;
> @@ -822,7 +816,7 @@ static struct kvm_s2_mmu *get_s2_mmu_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	for (i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_next;
>  	     i < (kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size + kvm->arch.nested_mmus_next);
>  	     i++) {
> -		s2_mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i % kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size];
> +		s2_mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i % kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size];
>
>  		if (atomic_read(&s2_mmu->refcnt) == 0)
>  			break;
> @@ -1269,7 +1263,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_wp(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		return;
>
>  	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
>  		if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
>  			kvm_stage2_wp_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu));
> @@ -1288,7 +1282,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm *kvm, bool may_block)
>  		return;
>
>  	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
>  		if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
>  			kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu), may_block);
> @@ -1307,7 +1301,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		return;
>
>  	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
>  		if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
>  			kvm_stage2_flush_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu));
> @@ -1316,16 +1310,15 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
>
>  void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +	for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
>  		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
>  			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
> +
> +		if ((i % S2_MMU_PER_VCPU) == 0)
> +			kvfree(mmu);
>  	}
> -	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> -	kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
>  	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
>  	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);

This is still all racey, but you address it in 2/2.

>  }
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Fix life cycle of the nested_mmus array

[Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> One issue with a typo'd type below (the compiler is ok with it because it's
> expressed as a sizeof(ptr) but it should be fixed) and a small nit, and
> also Wei Lin had a comment re: the commit message.

(oops - Wei Lin commented on 2/2 commit msg, disregard that bit for this
patch :)

--
Cheers, Lorenzo

[PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Delay freeing of shadow S2 structures until VM destruction

[Marc Zyngier]

We free the shadow S2 structures from kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(), which
is a Bad Idea(tm). Freeing the page tables is fair game (this is what
this callback is for), but freeing the container that could still be
referenced by another part of the system is not great.

Instead, grow separate destructors that gets called when we tear the VM
down for good. From there, we can nuke both the individual MMUs as well
as the global array that points to them, safe in the knowledge that the
vcpus themselves have been destroyed already.

Note that similarly to what happens for the canonical S2 MMU, we need to
manage the freeing of the page tables both in kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all
(called on address space teardown) and VM teardown (as a result of
closing the VM fd, amongst others), as there is no guaranteed ordering
between these two events.

Fixes: 4f128f8e1aaac ("KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                |  4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
index 5b8edb2e8a87d..586026e859030 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static inline u64 translate_ttbr0_el2_to_ttbr0_el1(u64 ttbr0)
 extern bool forward_smc_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 extern bool forward_debug_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 extern int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
+extern void kvm_destroy_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
 extern int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 extern void kvm_init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
 extern struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 7607173c1a40c..2b069c6440669 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 
 err_uninit_mmu:
 	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
-	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
+	kvm_destroy_nested(kvm);
 err_free_cpumask:
 	free_cpumask_var(kvm->arch.supported_cpus);
 err_unshare_kvm:
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	kvm_unshare_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
 
-	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
+	kvm_destroy_nested(kvm);
 	kvm_arm_teardown_hypercalls(kvm);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 254cbd8703b3d..d0c05db554b1c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -55,6 +55,27 @@ int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
 	return kvm->arch.nested_mmus ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
 }
 
+static void kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
+		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
+
+		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
+			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
+	}
+}
+
+void kvm_destroy_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(kvm);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i+= S2_MMU_PER_VCPU)
+		kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
+
+	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
+	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
+}
+
 static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1310,16 +1331,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
-
-		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
-			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
-
-		if ((i % S2_MMU_PER_VCPU) == 0)
-			kvfree(mmu);
-	}
-	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
+	kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(kvm);
 	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
 }
 
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Delay freeing of shadow S2 structures until VM destruction

[Wei-Lin Chang]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:32:30AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We free the shadow S2 structures from kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(), which
> is a Bad Idea(tm). Freeing the page tables is fair game (this is what
> this callback is for), but freeing the container that could still be
> referenced by another part of the system is not great.
> 
> Instead, grow separate destructors that gets called when we tear the VM
> down for good. From there, we can nuke both the individual MMUs as well
> as the global array that points to them, safe in the knowledge that the
> vcpus themselves have been destroyed already.
> 
> Note that similarly to what happens for the canonical S2 MMU, we need to
> manage the freeing of the page tables both in kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all
> (called on address space teardown) and VM teardown (as a result of
> closing the VM fd, amongst others), as there is no guaranteed ordering
> between these two events.

From my understanding, for a normal teardown, address space vs VM
teardown ordering does not matter. kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() will
always be run before kvm_arch_destroy_vm(). (there is
mmu_notifier_unregister() before kvm_arch_destroy_vm() in
kvm_destroy_vm())

The reason we need kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() in both functions is if
kvm_create_vm() fails the canonical pgt could be allocated without the
mmu notifier registered. Therefore a kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() in
kvm_arch_destroy_vm() is required.

For nested mmus we have different conditions. No pgts can be allocated
unless the VM is successfully created, this makes
kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu() redundant in kvm_destroy_nested().

I don't oppose to having kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu() in
kvm_destroy_nested(), as it makes the operations symmetric for canonical
and nested mmus.

For this last paragraph, maybe we can just remove it, or describe the
extra kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu() in kvm_destroy_nested() as
defensive.

Thanks,
Wei-Lin Chang

> 
> Fixes: 4f128f8e1aaac ("KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> index 5b8edb2e8a87d..586026e859030 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static inline u64 translate_ttbr0_el2_to_ttbr0_el1(u64 ttbr0)
>  extern bool forward_smc_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern bool forward_debug_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
> +extern void kvm_destroy_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
>  extern int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern void kvm_init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
>  extern struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 7607173c1a40c..2b069c6440669 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  
>  err_uninit_mmu:
>  	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
> -	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> +	kvm_destroy_nested(kvm);
>  err_free_cpumask:
>  	free_cpumask_var(kvm->arch.supported_cpus);
>  err_unshare_kvm:
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  
>  	kvm_unshare_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
>  
> -	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> +	kvm_destroy_nested(kvm);
>  	kvm_arm_teardown_hypercalls(kvm);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index 254cbd8703b3d..d0c05db554b1c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,27 @@ int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	return kvm->arch.nested_mmus ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
> +static void kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +
> +		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
> +			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_destroy_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(kvm);
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i+= S2_MMU_PER_VCPU)
> +		kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
> +
> +	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
> +	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> +}
> +
>  static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
>  	/*
> @@ -1310,16 +1331,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
>  
>  void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> -
> -		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
> -			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
> -
> -		if ((i % S2_MMU_PER_VCPU) == 0)
> -			kvfree(mmu);
> -	}
> -	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
> +	kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(kvm);
>  	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Delay freeing of shadow S2 structures until VM destruction

[Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:32:30AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We free the shadow S2 structures from kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(), which
> is a Bad Idea(tm). Freeing the page tables is fair game (this is what
> this callback is for), but freeing the container that could still be
> referenced by another part of the system is not great.
>
> Instead, grow separate destructors that gets called when we tear the VM
> down for good. From there, we can nuke both the individual MMUs as well
> as the global array that points to them, safe in the knowledge that the
> vcpus themselves have been destroyed already.
>
> Note that similarly to what happens for the canonical S2 MMU, we need to
> manage the freeing of the page tables both in kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all
> (called on address space teardown) and VM teardown (as a result of
> closing the VM fd, amongst others), as there is no guaranteed ordering
> between these two events.
>
> Fixes: 4f128f8e1aaac ("KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

All LGTM, Wei Lin had a comment on the commit msg (now saying this on the right
commit...!) so with that addressed:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>

> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> index 5b8edb2e8a87d..586026e859030 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static inline u64 translate_ttbr0_el2_to_ttbr0_el1(u64 ttbr0)
>  extern bool forward_smc_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern bool forward_debug_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
> +extern void kvm_destroy_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
>  extern int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  extern void kvm_init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
>  extern struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 7607173c1a40c..2b069c6440669 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>
>  err_uninit_mmu:
>  	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
> -	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> +	kvm_destroy_nested(kvm);
>  err_free_cpumask:
>  	free_cpumask_var(kvm->arch.supported_cpus);
>  err_unshare_kvm:
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>
>  	kvm_unshare_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
>
> -	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> +	kvm_destroy_nested(kvm);

Yeah this definitely seems to be the right place to do it.

>  	kvm_arm_teardown_hypercalls(kvm);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index 254cbd8703b3d..d0c05db554b1c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,27 @@ int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	return kvm->arch.nested_mmus ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
>  }
>
> +static void kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> +		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> +
> +		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
> +			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_destroy_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(kvm);
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i+= S2_MMU_PER_VCPU)
> +		kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
> +
> +	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
> +	kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> +}
> +
>  static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
>  	/*
> @@ -1310,16 +1331,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
>
>  void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> -
> -		if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
> -			kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
> -
> -		if ((i % S2_MMU_PER_VCPU) == 0)
> -			kvfree(mmu);
> -	}
> -	kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
> +	kvm_uninit_shadow_stage2_mmu(kvm);
>  	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
>  }
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo