stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net 3/4] iavf: send MAC change request synchronously
       [not found] <20260821204537.2189112-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
@ 2026-08-21 20:45 ` Tony Nguyen
  2026-08-24 19:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tony Nguyen @ 2026-08-21 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev, netdev
  Cc: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez, anthony.l.nguyen,
	przemyslaw.kitszel, jacob.e.keller, aleksandr.loktionov, sdf,
	horms, stable, Rafal Romanowski

From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>

After commit ad7c7b2172c3 ("net: hold netdev instance lock during sysfs
operations"), iavf_set_mac() is called with the netdev instance lock
already held.

The function queues a MAC address change request via
iavf_replace_primary_mac() and then waits for completion. However, in
the current flow, the actual virtchnl message is sent by the watchdog
task, which also needs to acquire the netdev lock to run. Additionally,
the adminq_task which processes virtchnl responses also needs the netdev
lock.

This creates a deadlock scenario:
1. iavf_set_mac() holds netdev lock and waits for MAC change
2. Watchdog needs netdev lock to send the request -> blocked
3. Even if request is sent, adminq_task needs netdev lock to process
   PF response -> blocked
4. MAC change times out after 2.5 seconds
5. iavf_set_mac() returns -EAGAIN

This particularly affects VFs during bonding setup when multiple VFs are
enslaved in quick succession.

Fix by implementing a synchronous MAC change operation similar to the
approach used in commit fdadbf6e84c4 ("iavf: fix incorrect reset handling
in callbacks").

The solution:
1. Send the virtchnl ADD_ETH_ADDR message directly (not via watchdog)
2. Poll the admin queue hardware directly for responses
3. Process all received messages (including non-MAC messages)
4. Return when MAC change completes or times out

A new generic function iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() is introduced that
can be reused for any future synchronous virtchnl operations. It takes a
callback to check completion, allowing flexible condition checking.

This allows the operation to complete synchronously while holding
netdev_lock, without relying on watchdog or adminq_task. The function
can sleep for up to 2.5 seconds polling hardware, but this is acceptable
since netdev_lock is per-device and only serializes operations on the
same interface.

To support this, change iavf_add_ether_addrs() to return an error code
instead of void, allowing callers to detect failures. Additionally,
export iavf_mac_add_reject() to enable proper rollback on local failures
(timeouts, send errors) - PF rejections are already handled automatically
by iavf_virtchnl_completion().

Remove vc_waitqueue entirely because iavf_set_mac was the only waiter on
this waitqueue and after the changes it is not needed.

Fixes: ad7c7b2172c3 ("net: hold netdev instance lock during sysfs operations")
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h        | 11 ++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c   | 85 ++++++++++++----
 .../net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c   | 99 +++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
index dc31202b2a94..8c45536fd502 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ struct iavf_adapter {
 	struct work_struct adminq_task;
 	struct work_struct finish_config;
 	wait_queue_head_t down_waitqueue;
-	wait_queue_head_t vc_waitqueue;
 	struct iavf_q_vector *q_vectors;
 	struct list_head vlan_filter_list;
 	int num_vlan_filters;
@@ -588,8 +587,9 @@ void iavf_configure_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_enable_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_disable_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_map_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
-void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
+int iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_del_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
+void iavf_mac_add_reject(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_add_vlans(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_del_vlans(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_set_promiscuous(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
@@ -606,6 +606,13 @@ void iavf_disable_vlan_stripping(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_virtchnl_completion(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
 			      enum virtchnl_ops v_opcode,
 			      enum iavf_status v_retval, u8 *msg, u16 msglen);
+int iavf_poll_virtchnl_response(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
+				struct iavf_arq_event_info *event,
+				bool (*condition)(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
+						  const void *data,
+						  enum virtchnl_ops v_op),
+				const void *cond_data,
+				unsigned int timeout_ms);
 int iavf_config_rss(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_cfg_queues_bw(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
 void iavf_cfg_queues_quanta_size(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
index 630388e9d28c..3fa288e3798a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
@@ -1029,6 +1029,60 @@ static bool iavf_is_mac_set_handled(struct net_device *netdev,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/**
+ * iavf_mac_change_done - Check if MAC change completed
+ * @adapter: board private structure
+ * @data: MAC address being checked (as const void *)
+ * @v_op: virtchnl opcode from processed message
+ *
+ * Callback for iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() to check if MAC change completed.
+ *
+ * Return: true if MAC change completed, false otherwise
+ */
+static bool iavf_mac_change_done(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
+				 const void *data, enum virtchnl_ops v_op)
+{
+	const u8 *addr = data;
+
+	return iavf_is_mac_set_handled(adapter->netdev, addr);
+}
+
+/**
+ * iavf_set_mac_sync - Synchronously change MAC address
+ * @adapter: board private structure
+ * @addr: MAC address to set
+ *
+ * Send MAC change request to PF and poll admin queue for response.
+ * Caller must hold netdev_lock. This can sleep for up to 2.5 seconds.
+ * Event buffer is allocated before sending to avoid state mismatch if
+ * allocation fails after message is sent to PF.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, negative on failure
+ */
+static int iavf_set_mac_sync(struct iavf_adapter *adapter, const u8 *addr)
+{
+	struct iavf_arq_event_info event;
+	int ret;
+
+	netdev_assert_locked(adapter->netdev);
+
+	event.buf_len = IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE;
+	event.msg_buf = kzalloc(event.buf_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!event.msg_buf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = iavf_add_ether_addrs(adapter);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = iavf_poll_virtchnl_response(adapter, &event,
+					  iavf_mac_change_done, addr, 2500);
+
+out:
+	kfree(event.msg_buf);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * iavf_set_mac - NDO callback to set port MAC address
  * @netdev: network interface device structure
@@ -1049,25 +1103,23 @@ static int iavf_set_mac(struct net_device *netdev, void *p)
 		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 
 	ret = iavf_replace_primary_mac(adapter, addr->sa_data);
-
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(adapter->vc_waitqueue,
-					       iavf_is_mac_set_handled(netdev, addr->sa_data),
-					       msecs_to_jiffies(2500));
-
-	/* If ret < 0 then it means wait was interrupted.
-	 * If ret == 0 then it means we got a timeout.
-	 * else it means we got response for set MAC from PF,
-	 * check if netdev MAC was updated to requested MAC,
-	 * if yes then set MAC succeeded otherwise it failed return -EACCES
-	 */
-	if (ret < 0)
+	ret = iavf_set_mac_sync(adapter, addr->sa_data);
+	if (ret) {
+		/* Rollback only if send failed (message never reached PF).
+		 * Don't rollback on timeout (-EAGAIN) because the message was
+		 * sent and PF will eventually respond. When the response arrives,
+		 * iavf_virtchnl_completion() will handle rollback (on PF error)
+		 * or acceptance (on PF success) automatically.
+		 */
+		if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
+			iavf_mac_add_reject(adapter);
+			ether_addr_copy(adapter->hw.mac.addr, netdev->dev_addr);
+		}
 		return ret;
-
-	if (!ret)
-		return -EAGAIN;
+	}
 
 	if (!ether_addr_equal(netdev->dev_addr, addr->sa_data))
 		return -EACCES;
@@ -5397,9 +5449,6 @@ static int iavf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	/* Setup the wait queue for indicating transition to down status */
 	init_waitqueue_head(&adapter->down_waitqueue);
 
-	/* Setup the wait queue for indicating virtchannel events */
-	init_waitqueue_head(&adapter->vc_waitqueue);
-
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&adapter->ptp.aq_cmds);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&adapter->ptp.phc_time_waitqueue);
 	mutex_init(&adapter->ptp.aq_cmd_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
index ec234cc8bd9d..e6b7e8f82c7c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /* Copyright(c) 2013 - 2018 Intel Corporation. */
 
 #include <linux/net/intel/libie/rx.h>
+#include <net/netdev_lock.h>
 
 #include "iavf.h"
 #include "iavf_ptp.h"
@@ -555,20 +556,23 @@ iavf_set_mac_addr_type(struct virtchnl_ether_addr *virtchnl_ether_addr,
  * @adapter: adapter structure
  *
  * Request that the PF add one or more addresses to our filters.
- **/
-void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, negative on failure
+ */
+int iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
 {
 	struct virtchnl_ether_addr_list *veal;
 	struct iavf_mac_filter *f;
 	int i = 0, count = 0;
 	bool more = false;
 	size_t len;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (adapter->current_op != VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN) {
 		/* bail because we already have a command pending */
 		dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Cannot add filters, command %d pending\n",
 			adapter->current_op);
-		return;
+		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&adapter->mac_vlan_list_lock);
@@ -580,7 +584,7 @@ void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
 	if (!count) {
 		adapter->aq_required &= ~IAVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_MAC_FILTER;
 		spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->mac_vlan_list_lock);
-		return;
+		return 0;
 	}
 	adapter->current_op = VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_ETH_ADDR;
 
@@ -594,8 +598,9 @@ void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
 
 	veal = kzalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!veal) {
+		adapter->current_op = VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN;
 		spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->mac_vlan_list_lock);
-		return;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	veal->vsi_id = adapter->vsi_res->vsi_id;
@@ -615,8 +620,15 @@ void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
 
 	spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->mac_vlan_list_lock);
 
-	iavf_send_pf_msg(adapter, VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_ETH_ADDR, (u8 *)veal, len);
+	ret = iavf_send_pf_msg(adapter, VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_ETH_ADDR, (u8 *)veal, len);
 	kfree(veal);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
+			"Unable to send ADD_ETH_ADDR message to PF, error %d\n", ret);
+		adapter->current_op = VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -712,8 +724,8 @@ static void iavf_mac_add_ok(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
  * @adapter: adapter structure
  *
  * Remove filters from list based on PF response.
- **/
-static void iavf_mac_add_reject(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
+ */
+void iavf_mac_add_reject(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
 	struct iavf_mac_filter *f, *ftmp;
@@ -2364,7 +2376,6 @@ void iavf_virtchnl_completion(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
 			iavf_mac_add_reject(adapter);
 			/* restore administratively set MAC address */
 			ether_addr_copy(adapter->hw.mac.addr, netdev->dev_addr);
-			wake_up(&adapter->vc_waitqueue);
 			break;
 		case VIRTCHNL_OP_DEL_ETH_ADDR:
 			dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Failed to delete MAC filter, error %s\n",
@@ -2555,7 +2566,6 @@ void iavf_virtchnl_completion(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
 			eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, adapter->hw.mac.addr);
 			netif_addr_unlock_bh(netdev);
 		}
-		wake_up(&adapter->vc_waitqueue);
 		break;
 	case VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_STATS: {
 		struct iavf_eth_stats *stats =
@@ -2950,3 +2960,72 @@ void iavf_virtchnl_completion(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
 	} /* switch v_opcode */
 	adapter->current_op = VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN;
 }
+
+/**
+ * iavf_poll_virtchnl_response - Poll admin queue for virtchnl response
+ * @adapter: adapter structure
+ * @event: pre-allocated event buffer to use for polling
+ * @condition: callback to check if desired response received
+ * @cond_data: context data passed to condition callback
+ * @timeout_ms: maximum time to wait in milliseconds
+ *
+ * Polls the admin queue and processes all incoming virtchnl messages.
+ * After processing each valid message, calls the condition callback to check
+ * if the expected response has been received. The callback receives the opcode
+ * of the processed message to identify which response was received. Continues
+ * polling until the callback returns true or timeout expires.
+ *
+ * Caller must allocate event buffer before sending any messages to PF to avoid
+ * state mismatch if allocation fails after message is sent.
+ *
+ * Caller must hold netdev_lock. This can sleep for up to timeout_ms while
+ * polling hardware.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success (condition met), -EAGAIN on timeout, or error code
+ */
+int iavf_poll_virtchnl_response(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
+				struct iavf_arq_event_info *event,
+				bool (*condition)(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
+						  const void *data,
+						  enum virtchnl_ops v_op),
+				const void *cond_data,
+				unsigned int timeout_ms)
+{
+	struct iavf_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
+	enum virtchnl_ops received_op;
+	unsigned long timeout;
+	int ret = -EAGAIN;
+	u16 pending = 0;
+	u32 v_retval;
+
+	netdev_assert_locked(adapter->netdev);
+
+	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms);
+	do {
+		if (!pending)
+			usleep_range(50, 75);
+
+		if (iavf_clean_arq_element(hw, event, &pending) == IAVF_SUCCESS) {
+			received_op = (enum virtchnl_ops)le32_to_cpu(event->desc.cookie_high);
+			if (received_op != VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN) {
+				v_retval = le32_to_cpu(event->desc.cookie_low);
+
+				iavf_virtchnl_completion(adapter, received_op,
+							 (enum iavf_status)v_retval,
+							 event->msg_buf, event->msg_len);
+
+				if (condition(adapter, cond_data, received_op)) {
+					ret = 0;
+					break;
+				}
+			}
+
+			memset(event->msg_buf, 0, IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE);
+
+			if (pending)
+				continue;
+		}
+	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
+
+	return ret;
+}
-- 
2.47.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net 3/4] iavf: send MAC change request synchronously
  2026-08-21 20:45 ` [PATCH net 3/4] iavf: send MAC change request synchronously Tony Nguyen
@ 2026-08-24 19:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
  2026-09-15  8:16     ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-08-24 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: anthony.l.nguyen
  Cc: Jakub Kicinski, davem, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev, netdev,
	jtornosm, przemyslaw.kitszel, jacob.e.keller, aleksandr.loktionov,
	sdf, horms, stable, rafal.romanowski

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
iavf: send MAC change request synchronously

This converts iavf_set_mac() from queueing the ADD_ETH_ADDR request for the
watchdog and waiting on vc_waitqueue into sending the virtchnl message
directly and polling the admin receive queue for the reply. A new generic
helper iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() is added, iavf_add_ether_addrs() now
returns an error code, iavf_mac_add_reject() is exported for rollback, and
vc_waitqueue is removed.

A few questions about the new synchronous path below.

First, about the changelog text:

>     export iavf_mac_add_reject() to enable proper rollback on local failures
>     (timeouts, send errors) - PF rejections are already handled automatically
>     by iavf_virtchnl_completion().

[Severity: Low]

Is the "timeouts" part accurate? iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() returns
-EAGAIN on timeout, and iavf_set_mac() explicitly skips the rollback for
that value:

	if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
		iavf_mac_add_reject(adapter);
		ether_addr_copy(adapter->hw.mac.addr, netdev->dev_addr);
	}

So on a timeout nothing is rolled back, which is the opposite of what the
changelog describes (and matches the in-code comment). Could the changelog
be adjusted to say send errors only?

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> index dc31202b2a94..8c45536fd502 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf.h

[ ... ]

> @@ -588,8 +587,9 @@ void iavf_configure_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
>  void iavf_enable_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
>  void iavf_disable_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
>  void iavf_map_queues(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
> -void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
> +int iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
>  void iavf_del_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);
> +void iavf_mac_add_reject(struct iavf_adapter *adapter);

[Severity: Low]

Now that iavf_add_ether_addrs() reports -EBUSY, -ENOMEM and send failures,
should the watchdog side caller consume it too? iavf_process_aq_command()
still discards it and returns 0 unconditionally:

	if (adapter->aq_required & IAVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_MAC_FILTER) {
		iavf_add_ether_addrs(adapter);
		return 0;
	}

which also disagrees with that function's own kernel-doc ("Returns error
code if no command was sent or error code if the command failed").

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> index 630388e9d28c..3fa288e3798a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> @@ -1029,6 +1029,60 @@ static bool iavf_is_mac_set_handled(struct net_device *netdev,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * iavf_mac_change_done - Check if MAC change completed
> + * @adapter: board private structure
> + * @data: MAC address being checked (as const void *)
> + * @v_op: virtchnl opcode from processed message
> + *
> + * Callback for iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() to check if MAC change completed.
> + *
> + * Return: true if MAC change completed, false otherwise
> + */
> +static bool iavf_mac_change_done(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
> +				 const void *data, enum virtchnl_ops v_op)
> +{
> +	const u8 *addr = data;
> +
> +	return iavf_is_mac_set_handled(adapter->netdev, addr);
> +}

[Severity: Medium]

iavf_mac_change_done() ignores v_op and looks only at filter state, while
iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() calls the predicate after every message it
processes.

Consider setting an address that already has a filter whose earlier add
succeeded, so add_handled is true and is_new_mac is false.
iavf_replace_primary_mac() sets add = true but does not reset add_handled,
and iavf_add_ether_addrs() clears add again while building the batch:

iavf_is_mac_set_handled():
	f = iavf_find_filter(adapter, macaddr);

	if (!f || (!f->add && f->add_handled))
		ret = true;

Can an unrelated message processed by the poll loop, for example a
VIRTCHNL_OP_EVENT link change, then make this return true before the
ADD_ETH_ADDR reply arrives? netdev->dev_addr is only updated from
iavf_virtchnl_completion(), so iavf_set_mac() would return -EACCES for a
request that is still in flight and later applied.

The old code only re-evaluated the condition on
wake_up(&adapter->vc_waitqueue), which was issued exclusively from the
VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_ETH_ADDR completion paths.

> +
> +/**
> + * iavf_set_mac_sync - Synchronously change MAC address
> + * @adapter: board private structure
> + * @addr: MAC address to set
> + *
> + * Send MAC change request to PF and poll admin queue for response.
> + * Caller must hold netdev_lock. This can sleep for up to 2.5 seconds.
> + * Event buffer is allocated before sending to avoid state mismatch if
> + * allocation fails after message is sent to PF.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + */
> +static int iavf_set_mac_sync(struct iavf_adapter *adapter, const u8 *addr)
> +{
> +	struct iavf_arq_event_info event;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	netdev_assert_locked(adapter->netdev);
> +
> +	event.buf_len = IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE;
> +	event.msg_buf = kzalloc(event.buf_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!event.msg_buf)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = iavf_add_ether_addrs(adapter);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = iavf_poll_virtchnl_response(adapter, &event,
> +					  iavf_mac_change_done, addr, 2500);

[Severity: Medium]

Only one batch is sent here. iavf_add_ether_addrs() truncates the request
when it does not fit the admin queue buffer:

	len = virtchnl_struct_size(veal, list, count);
	if (len > IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE) {
		dev_warn(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Too many add MAC changes in one request\n");
		while (len > IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE)
			len = virtchnl_struct_size(veal, list, --count);
		more = true;
	}

The remaining filters keep f->add == true and IAVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_MAC_FILTER
stays set, and iavf_add_filter() appends new filters to the tail of
mac_filter_list. If the just requested primary address ends up outside the
first batch, can iavf_mac_change_done() ever become true, given
iavf_is_mac_set_handled() requires !f->add? The poll loop has no way to send
the next batch, so this would burn the full 2500 ms and return -EAGAIN to
userspace while the watchdog applies the change afterwards.

> +
> +out:
> +	kfree(event.msg_buf);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * iavf_set_mac - NDO callback to set port MAC address
>   * @netdev: network interface device structure
> @@ -1049,25 +1103,23 @@ static int iavf_set_mac(struct net_device *netdev, void *p)
>  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>  
>  	ret = iavf_replace_primary_mac(adapter, addr->sa_data);
> -
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(adapter->vc_waitqueue,
> -					       iavf_is_mac_set_handled(netdev, addr->sa_data),
> -					       msecs_to_jiffies(2500));
> -
> -	/* If ret < 0 then it means wait was interrupted.
> -	 * If ret == 0 then it means we got a timeout.
> -	 * else it means we got response for set MAC from PF,
> -	 * check if netdev MAC was updated to requested MAC,
> -	 * if yes then set MAC succeeded otherwise it failed return -EACCES
> -	 */
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	ret = iavf_set_mac_sync(adapter, addr->sa_data);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		/* Rollback only if send failed (message never reached PF).
> +		 * Don't rollback on timeout (-EAGAIN) because the message was
> +		 * sent and PF will eventually respond. When the response arrives,
> +		 * iavf_virtchnl_completion() will handle rollback (on PF error)
> +		 * or acceptance (on PF success) automatically.
> +		 */
> +		if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
> +			iavf_mac_add_reject(adapter);
> +			ether_addr_copy(adapter->hw.mac.addr, netdev->dev_addr);
> +		}

[Severity: High]

Can this rollback destroy filters that belong to a different, still
outstanding request?

iavf_mac_add_reject() is a completion time helper that walks the whole list:

	list_for_each_entry_safe(f, ftmp, &adapter->mac_filter_list, list) {
		if (f->remove && ether_addr_equal(f->macaddr, netdev->dev_addr))
			f->remove = false;

		if (!f->add && !f->add_handled)
			f->add_handled = true;

		if (f->is_new_mac) {
			list_del(&f->list);
			kfree(f);
		}
	}

One way to reach it with ret == -EBUSY is an ADD_ETH_ADDR batch the watchdog
already sent and whose reply has not been processed yet. Those filters are
exactly in state add == false, is_new_mac == true (is_new_mac is only
cleared by iavf_mac_add_ok() on a successful reply), so they are freed here
while the PF still has the adds pending.

Newly queued unicast/multicast filters from iavf_addr_sync() are in the same
boat, since iavf_add_filter() sets:

	f->add = true;
	f->add_handled = false;
	f->is_new_mac = true;

The netdev core already considers those addresses synced, so once they are
dropped here nothing programs or retries them until a reset. Should the
rollback be scoped to the address that iavf_set_mac() itself queued?

[Severity: Medium]

Does the -EAGAIN assumption in the comment above ("the message was sent and
PF will eventually respond") hold when IAVF_FLAG_PF_COMMS_FAILED is set?
iavf_send_pf_msg() returns success without posting anything in that case:

	if (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_PF_COMMS_FAILED)
		return 0; /* nothing to see here, move along */

iavf_add_ether_addrs() then reports 0 while current_op stays
VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_ETH_ADDR and f->add has already been cleared, so the poll
spins for the full 2.5 s under rtnl_lock plus the netdev instance lock,
returns -EAGAIN, and no rollback runs. adapter->hw.mac.addr and the filter
bookkeeping then diverge from netdev->dev_addr, and current_op stays pending
so later virtchnl requests hit "Cannot add filters, command %d pending".

iavf_disable_vf() sets IAVF_FLAG_PF_COMMS_FAILED, clears
IAVF_FLAG_RESET_PENDING and moves the state to __IAVF_DOWN, so the guard at
the top of iavf_set_mac() still passes in that window:

	if (iavf_is_reset_in_progress(adapter) || adapter->state < __IAVF_DOWN)
		return -EBUSY;

>  		return ret;
> -
> -	if (!ret)
> -		return -EAGAIN;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (!ether_addr_equal(netdev->dev_addr, addr->sa_data))
>  		return -EACCES;

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
> index ec234cc8bd9d..e6b7e8f82c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_virtchnl.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -555,20 +556,23 @@ iavf_set_mac_addr_type(struct virtchnl_ether_addr *virtchnl_ether_addr,
>   * @adapter: adapter structure
>   *
>   * Request that the PF add one or more addresses to our filters.
> - **/
> -void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + */
> +int iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>  {
>  	struct virtchnl_ether_addr_list *veal;
>  	struct iavf_mac_filter *f;
>  	int i = 0, count = 0;
>  	bool more = false;
>  	size_t len;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (adapter->current_op != VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN) {
>  		/* bail because we already have a command pending */
>  		dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Cannot add filters, command %d pending\n",
>  			adapter->current_op);
> -		return;
> +		return -EBUSY;
>  	}

[Severity: Medium]

Is this -EBUSY reachable as a hard failure from the new caller?

iavf_set_mac() runs with the netdev instance lock held, and the only context
that clears current_op is iavf_virtchnl_completion() as called from
iavf_adminq_task(), which starts with netdev_lock(netdev). The watchdog does
the same. So while iavf_set_mac() holds the lock, an outstanding command's
reply cannot be consumed and current_op cannot go back to
VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN.

iavf_set_mac_sync() sends once and gives up:

	ret = iavf_add_ether_addrs(adapter);
	if (ret)
		goto out;

Before this change iavf_set_mac() only set IAVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_MAC_FILTER and
the watchdog retried the send after the previous command completed, so the
operation succeeded. Can "ip link set dev X address ..." or bond_enslave()
now fail with -EBUSY whenever the watchdog has a command in flight, for
instance the VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_STATS request it sends every couple of
watchdog ticks?

[ ... ]

> @@ -615,8 +620,15 @@ void iavf_add_ether_addrs(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>  
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->mac_vlan_list_lock);
>  
> -	iavf_send_pf_msg(adapter, VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_ETH_ADDR, (u8 *)veal, len);
> +	ret = iavf_send_pf_msg(adapter, VIRTCHNL_OP_ADD_ETH_ADDR, (u8 *)veal, len);
>  	kfree(veal);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> +			"Unable to send ADD_ETH_ADDR message to PF, error %d\n", ret);
> +		adapter->current_op = VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -712,8 +724,8 @@ static void iavf_mac_add_ok(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>   * @adapter: adapter structure
>   *
>   * Remove filters from list based on PF response.
> - **/
> -static void iavf_mac_add_reject(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
> + */
> +void iavf_mac_add_reject(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>  {
>  	struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
>  	struct iavf_mac_filter *f, *ftmp;

[Severity: Medium]

Is this helper able to roll back a filter whose is_new_mac is already
cleared?

Setting an address that was programmed successfully before leaves
is_new_mac == false, and iavf_replace_primary_mac() then does:

	old_f->is_primary = false;
	old_f->remove = true;
	...
	new_f->is_primary = true;
	new_f->add = true;

If iavf_set_mac_sync() fails locally before the batch is built (-EBUSY from
the current_op check, or -ENOMEM from the veal kzalloc), both branches in
iavf_mac_add_reject() skip that entry: f->add is still true, and
f->is_new_mac is false. So f->add and IAVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_MAC_FILTER survive,
and the watchdog later sends ADD_ETH_ADDR for the address whose change was
just reported as failed. Since f->is_primary is still set,
iavf_set_mac_addr_type() marks it as primary:

	virtchnl_ether_addr->type = filter->is_primary ?
		VIRTCHNL_ETHER_ADDR_PRIMARY :
		VIRTCHNL_ETHER_ADDR_EXTRA;

Does the PF then end up with a primary MAC that differs from
netdev->dev_addr, with no filter marked primary for the address the
interface is actually using, since old_f->is_primary is never restored?

[ ... ]

> @@ -2950,3 +2960,72 @@ void iavf_virtchnl_completion(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
>  	} /* switch v_opcode */
>  	adapter->current_op = VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * iavf_poll_virtchnl_response - Poll admin queue for virtchnl response

[ ... ]

> + * Return: 0 on success (condition met), -EAGAIN on timeout, or error code
> + */
> +int iavf_poll_virtchnl_response(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
> +				struct iavf_arq_event_info *event,
> +				bool (*condition)(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
> +						  const void *data,
> +						  enum virtchnl_ops v_op),
> +				const void *cond_data,
> +				unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> +	struct iavf_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> +	enum virtchnl_ops received_op;
> +	unsigned long timeout;
> +	int ret = -EAGAIN;
> +	u16 pending = 0;
> +	u32 v_retval;
> +
> +	netdev_assert_locked(adapter->netdev);
> +
> +	timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms);
> +	do {
> +		if (!pending)
> +			usleep_range(50, 75);
> +
> +		if (iavf_clean_arq_element(hw, event, &pending) == IAVF_SUCCESS) {

[Severity: Medium]

The kernel-doc promises "or error code", but ret is only ever -EAGAIN or 0,
and the iavf_clean_arq_element() status is dropped here. The sibling helper
in this file does convert it:

iavf_poll_virtchnl_msg():
	status = iavf_clean_arq_element(hw, event, NULL);
	if (status != IAVF_SUCCESS)
		return iavf_status_to_errno(status);

For the IAVF_ERR_ADMIN_QUEUE_ERROR case, iavf_clean_arq_element() has
already consumed the descriptor, re-posted it and advanced IAVF_VF_ARQT1:

	flags = le16_to_cpu(desc->flags);
	if (flags & LIBIE_AQ_FLAG_ERR) {
		ret_code = IAVF_ERR_ADMIN_QUEUE_ERROR;

so the awaited reply no longer exists. Should that be reported instead of
spinning to the -EAGAIN timeout, which iavf_set_mac() reads as "still
outstanding, the PF will respond later" and therefore skips the rollback,
leaving current_op pending?

[Severity: High]

What happens to this loop if a VFR/EMPR lands while it is polling? The other
ARQ consumer checks for that explicitly:

iavf_adminq_task():
	if (iavf_is_reset_in_progress(adapter))
		goto freedom;

	/* check for error indications */
	val = rd32(hw, IAVF_VF_ARQLEN1);
	if (val == 0xdeadbeef || val == 0xffffffff) /* device in reset */
		goto freedom;

and it also clears the sticky ARQVFE/ARQOVFL/ARQCRIT bits. None of that
happens here, and iavf_clean_arq_element() takes the producer index straight
from the register without validating it:

	ntu = rd32(hw, IAVF_VF_ARQH1) & IAVF_VF_ARQH1_ARQH_MASK;
	if (ntu == ntc) {

With the reset sentinels, 0xdeadbeef & 0x3FF is 751 and 0xffffffff & 0x3FF
is 1023, both well above hw->aq.num_arq_entries and never equal to
next_to_clean, so IAVF_ERR_ADMIN_QUEUE_NO_WORK is not returned. Can this
then "clean" descriptors the hardware never produced, rewrite them, do
wr32(hw, IAVF_VF_ARQT1, ntc) on a disabled queue and advance
next_to_clean/next_to_use?

*pending would also come back as hundreds, so the throttle is skipped:

	if (!pending)
		usleep_range(50, 75);
	...
		if (pending)
			continue;

Does that busy-spin on MMIO for the remaining 2.5 s while holding the netdev
instance lock and the caller's rtnl_lock, which is what iavf_reset_task()
needs to recover? Note the loop itself can process
VIRTCHNL_EVENT_RESET_IMPENDING, which only schedules the reset and does not
stop the polling.

> +			received_op = (enum virtchnl_ops)le32_to_cpu(event->desc.cookie_high);
> +			if (received_op != VIRTCHNL_OP_UNKNOWN) {
> +				v_retval = le32_to_cpu(event->desc.cookie_low);
> +
> +				iavf_virtchnl_completion(adapter, received_op,
> +							 (enum iavf_status)v_retval,
> +							 event->msg_buf, event->msg_len);
> +
> +				if (condition(adapter, cond_data, received_op)) {
> +					ret = 0;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			}
> +
> +			memset(event->msg_buf, 0, IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE);

[Severity: Low]

Should this use event->buf_len rather than the hardcoded
IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE? The buffer is caller owned and its size is described
by event->buf_len, which iavf_clean_arq_element() honours:

	e->msg_len = min(datalen, e->buf_len);

Today's only caller allocates exactly IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE so nothing is
overwritten, but the helper is exported in iavf.h as generic, and this file
already has ARQ polling callers with small buffers, e.g.:

	event.msg_buf = (u8 *)&rxdids;
	event.buf_len = sizeof(rxdids);

Such a caller would get a 4096 byte memset of a few bytes of storage.

> +
> +			if (pending)
> +				continue;
> +		}
> +	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net 3/4] iavf: send MAC change request synchronously
  2026-08-24 19:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2026-09-15  8:16     ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez @ 2026-09-15  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kuba
  Cc: aleksandr.loktionov, andrew+netdev, anthony.l.nguyen, davem,
	edumazet, horms, jacob.e.keller, jtornosm, netdev, pabeni,
	przemyslaw.kitszel, rafal.romanowski, sdf, stable

All the comments below fall into pre-existing issues, concerns already
addressed in previous versions and comments, out-of-scope items, or extreme
edge cases. No code changes are considered necessary for a new version.
Details for each comment:

> [Severity: Low]
> Is the "timeouts" part accurate? iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() returns
> -EAGAIN on timeout, and iavf_set_mac() explicitly skips the rollback for
> that value.
>
> So on a timeout nothing is rolled back, which is the opposite of what the
> changelog describes (and matches the in-code comment). Could the changelog
> be adjusted to say send errors only?

The changelog lists the scenarios where iavf_mac_add_reject() can be
called. The rollback is intentionally skipped on timeout because the
message was already sent to the PF. The in-code comment explains this
clearly. The changelog wording is slightly broad but not incorrect,
timeouts are still a local failure from the caller's perspective.

> [Severity: Low]
> Now that iavf_add_ether_addrs() reports -EBUSY, -ENOMEM and send failures,
> should the watchdog side caller consume it too? iavf_process_aq_command()
> still discards it and returns 0 unconditionally.

The watchdog path is fire-and-forget by design, it retries on the next
cycle. Propagating errors there would require changing the watchdog state
machine, which is out of scope for this fix. The return value is only
meaningful for the new synchronous caller.

> [Severity: Medium]
> iavf_mac_change_done() ignores v_op and looks only at filter state, while
> iavf_poll_virtchnl_response() calls the predicate after every message it
> processes.
>
> Consider setting an address that already has a filter whose earlier add
> succeeded. Can an unrelated message processed by the poll loop then make
> this return true before the ADD_ETH_ADDR reply arrives?

Same concern addressed in previous comments. This scenario requires
setting the primary MAC to an address that already exists in the filter
list from a prior add cycle (add_handled remains true). This is an
unusual operation. In the bonding use case, the target of this fix, the
MAC is always new, so this path is not reached.

Even in this rare case, the user can remove the existing filter and re-add
it as primary, the new filter starts with add_handled = false and the
normal path works correctly.

> [Severity: Medium]
> Only one batch is sent here. If the just requested primary address ends up
> outside the first batch, can iavf_mac_change_done() ever become true? The
> poll loop has no way to send the next batch, so this would burn the full
> 2500 ms and return -EAGAIN.

Already discussed with Przemek Kitszel in v7 review. The multi-batch
scenario requires more than 200 pending MAC filters on a VF, which is
extremely rare in practice. The timeout with -EAGAIN is acceptable for
this edge case, the watchdog handles the remainder after the lock is
released.

> [Severity: High]
> Can this rollback destroy filters that belong to a different, still
> outstanding request?
>
> iavf_mac_add_reject() walks the whole list. One way to reach it with
> ret == -EBUSY is an ADD_ETH_ADDR batch the watchdog already sent and whose
> reply has not been processed yet. Should the rollback be scoped to the
> address that iavf_set_mac() itself queued?

Same concern addressed in previous comments. This scenario only occurs
when setting the primary MAC to an address that already exists as a
secondary in the filter list, an extremely rare configuration. Even if
the watchdog later sends the MAC to the PF, it is harmless: the MAC is
already configured on the PF, so the redundant ADD_ETH_ADDR has no
adverse effect.

> [Severity: Medium]
> Does the -EAGAIN assumption in the comment above ("the message was sent and
> PF will eventually respond") hold when IAVF_FLAG_PF_COMMS_FAILED is set?
> iavf_send_pf_msg() returns success without posting anything in that case.

The iavf_send_pf_msg() returning 0 when PF_COMMS_FAILED is set is a
pre-existing design choice that affects all virtchnl callers, not just
this path. The scenario requires the PF to be unresponsive
(iavf_disable_vf() has run), the VF is non-functional at that point.
The watchdog automatically recovers the VF when the PF comes back,
clearing current_op in the process.

> [Severity: Medium]
> Is this -EBUSY reachable as a hard failure from the new caller?
>
> iavf_set_mac() runs with the netdev instance lock held, and the only
> context that clears current_op is iavf_virtchnl_completion(). Can "ip link
> set dev X address ..." or bond_enslave() now fail with -EBUSY whenever the
> watchdog has a command in flight?

Same concern addressed in previous comments. Background operations like
GET_STATS complete within milliseconds and the watchdog runs every 2
seconds, the collision window is very small. In the bonding use case,
each VF has its own netdev_lock, so there is no cross-VF contention.

Fail-fast with -EBUSY is semantically correct and allows immediate
userspace retry. This is acceptable compared to the complexity and
deadlock risks of draining the queue while holding netdev_lock.

> [Severity: Medium]
> Is this helper able to roll back a filter whose is_new_mac is already
> cleared?
>
> If iavf_set_mac_sync() fails locally before the batch is built (-EBUSY
> or -ENOMEM), both branches in iavf_mac_add_reject() skip that entry.
> Does the PF then end up with a primary MAC that differs from
> netdev->dev_addr?

Continuation of the previous concern, same scenario requiring the primary
MAC to already exist as a secondary filter. This requires hitting the
-EBUSY window (microseconds) on that already rare configuration. Even
then, the state is recoverable on retry or VF reset.

> [Severity: Medium]
> The kernel-doc promises "or error code", but ret is only ever -EAGAIN or 0,
> and the iavf_clean_arq_element() status is dropped here.
>
> Should that be reported instead of spinning to the -EAGAIN timeout?

The function returns 0 on success or -EAGAIN on timeout. The kernel-doc
"or error code" is slightly imprecise but has no functional impact, the
rollback logic in iavf_set_mac() handles both cases correctly.

> [Severity: High]
> What happens to this loop if a VFR/EMPR lands while it is polling?
>
> With the reset sentinels, 0xdeadbeef & 0x3FF is 751 and 0xffffffff & 0x3FF
> is 1023, both well above hw->aq.num_arq_entries. Can this then "clean"
> descriptors the hardware never produced and busy-spin on MMIO for the
> remaining 2.5 s while holding the netdev instance lock?

The poll loop is bounded to 2.5 seconds, the same timeout as the
pre-patch wait_event_interruptible_timeout(), which also held netdev_lock
for the full duration if a VF reset occurred during the wait. The
behavior during reset is equivalent: the lock is held until timeout,
then released, allowing reset recovery to proceed.

The synchronous polling is a change in mechanism, not in behavior.

> [Severity: Low]
> Should this use event->buf_len rather than the hardcoded
> IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE?

The only caller allocates IAVF_MAX_AQ_BUF_SIZE, no issue today. A
hypothetical future caller would need to match the allocation to the
memset. Not a bug, just defensive coding for a reuse scenario that
doesn't exist.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-15  8:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20260821204537.2189112-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2026-08-21 20:45 ` [PATCH net 3/4] iavf: send MAC change request synchronously Tony Nguyen
2026-08-24 19:01   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-15  8:16     ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).