Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
@ 2026-09-03 10:45 gregkh
  2026-09-03 15:32 ` [PATCH 5.15.y] apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section() Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-09-03 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jannh, john.johansen; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 3f4ae5fab613dca01d6a2a8210dd832e009fcf47
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026090300-majesty-sister-c067@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' 'HEAD^..'

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 3f4ae5fab613dca01d6a2a8210dd832e009fcf47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 17:55:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by
 begin_current_label_crit_section()

AppArmor's begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called
from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks
if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if
so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an
updated version that uses a new label.

The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of
`struct cred` if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current
creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces
creds, like so:
```
const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
alloc_file_pseudo(...);
uid_t uid = cred->euid;
```
I don't know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it
is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF.

The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label()
runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if
`current_cred() != current_real_cred()` (mirroring the check in
proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can't actually reliably detect
overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the
objective creds.

So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong:

1. task begins with <creds A> (as both objective and subjective creds),
   with refcount=2
2. task grabs an extra reference on <creds A> for overriding
3. task calls override_creds(<creds A>), which returns a pointer to the old
   subjective creds (<creds A>)
4. task enters AppArmor LSM hook
5. AppArmor checks that objective/subjective creds are equal
6. AppArmor replaces both cred pointers with <creds B> and drops 2 refs on
   <creds A>
7. task leaves AppArmor LSM hook
8. task calls revert_creds(<creds A>)
9. now task->cred is <creds A> while task->real_cred is <creds B>, but the
   task_struct logically holds two references to <creds B>
10. another task drops the extra reference on <creds A> that was used for
    overriding, refcount drops to 0
11. now task->real_cred points to freed creds

At this point, any access to current_cred() will be UAF.

I have a test case where I run aa-disable on a profile while a process
using that profile is blocked on splice() from a FUSE passthrough file into
a full pipe; after the profile update, the pipe becomes empty, splice()
resumes, the credentials go out of sync, and a subsequent getuid() syscall
results in a KASAN UAF splat.

To fix this, instead of directly replacing creds, do it via task_work that
will run at the end of the current syscall. (The point in time at which the
cred replacement happens should have no correctness impact; it is just a
performance optimization to avoid unnecessarily touching the refcount of
the new label.)

Note that AppArmor still performs direct cred replacements in the
sb_pivotroot LSM hook after this change, and that direct cred replacements
can still happen in VFS ->write() callbacks via proc_pid_attr_write().

There are two options for what to do with aa_dup_task_ctx(): Either
explicitly reset new->label_replacement_pending after the entire
aa_task_ctx has been copied, or switch to manually copying members over.
I am switching to manually copying members over because that should make
bugs more obvious.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c75afcd153f6 ("AppArmor: contexts used in attaching policy to system objects")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
index 2b6098149b15..0e8b67159f56 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
@@ -222,13 +222,9 @@ static inline struct aa_label *begin_current_label_crit_section(void)
 {
 	struct aa_label *label = aa_current_raw_label();
 
-	might_sleep();
-
 	if (label_is_stale(label)) {
 		label = aa_get_newest_label(label);
-		if (aa_replace_current_label(label) == 0)
-			/* task cred will keep the reference */
-			aa_put_label(label);
+		aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement();
 	}
 
 	return label;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/task.h b/security/apparmor/include/task.h
index 017d8b06b8f2..a8030ed78ff2 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/task.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/task.h
@@ -26,15 +26,22 @@ static inline struct aa_task_ctx *task_ctx(struct task_struct *task)
  * @onexec: profile to transition to on next exec  (MAY BE NULL)
  * @previous: profile the task may return to     (MAY BE NULL)
  * @token: magic value the task must know for returning to @previous_profile
+ * @label_replacement_tw: for aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement()
+ * @label_replacement_pending: is @label_replacement_tw pending?
+ *
+ * When changing this, check if aa_dup_task_ctx() needs to be updated.
  */
 struct aa_task_ctx {
 	struct aa_label *nnp;
 	struct aa_label *onexec;
 	struct aa_label *previous;
 	u64 token;
+	struct callback_head label_replacement_tw;
+	bool label_replacement_pending;
 };
 
 int aa_replace_current_label(struct aa_label *label);
+void aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement(void);
 void aa_set_current_onexec(struct aa_label *label, bool stack);
 int aa_set_current_hat(struct aa_label *label, u64 token);
 int aa_restore_previous_label(u64 cookie);
@@ -61,10 +68,10 @@ static inline void aa_free_task_ctx(struct aa_task_ctx *ctx)
 static inline void aa_dup_task_ctx(struct aa_task_ctx *new,
 				   const struct aa_task_ctx *old)
 {
-	*new = *old;
-	aa_get_label(new->nnp);
-	aa_get_label(new->previous);
-	aa_get_label(new->onexec);
+	new->nnp = aa_get_label(old->nnp);
+	new->onexec = aa_get_label(old->onexec);
+	new->previous = aa_get_label(old->previous);
+	new->token = old->token;
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/security/apparmor/task.c b/security/apparmor/task.c
index b9fb3738124e..e16ff4130bc2 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/task.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/task.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/gfp.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/task_work.h>
 
 #include "include/path.h"
 #include "include/audit.h"
@@ -89,6 +90,32 @@ int aa_replace_current_label(struct aa_label *label)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void aa_replace_stale_label_tw_func(struct callback_head *tw)
+{
+	struct aa_task_ctx *ctx = task_ctx(current);
+	struct aa_label *label;
+
+	ctx->label_replacement_pending = false;
+	label = aa_current_raw_label();
+	if (!label_is_stale(label))
+		return;
+	label = aa_get_newest_label(label);
+	aa_replace_current_label(label);
+	aa_put_label(label);
+}
+
+/* replace the current task's stale label on syscall return */
+void aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement(void)
+{
+	struct aa_task_ctx *ctx = task_ctx(current);
+
+	if (ctx->label_replacement_pending)
+		return;
+	init_task_work(&ctx->label_replacement_tw, aa_replace_stale_label_tw_func);
+	if (task_work_add(current, &ctx->label_replacement_tw, TWA_RESUME) == 0)
+		ctx->label_replacement_pending = true;
+}
+
 
 /**
  * aa_set_current_onexec - set the tasks change_profile to happen onexec


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.15.y] apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section()
  2026-09-03 10:45 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-09-03 15:32 ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-03 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Jann Horn, John Johansen, Sasha Levin

From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 3f4ae5fab613dca01d6a2a8210dd832e009fcf47 ]

AppArmor's begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called
from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks
if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if
so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an
updated version that uses a new label.

The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of
`struct cred` if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current
creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces
creds, like so:
```
const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
alloc_file_pseudo(...);
uid_t uid = cred->euid;
```
I don't know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it
is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF.

The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label()
runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if
`current_cred() != current_real_cred()` (mirroring the check in
proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can't actually reliably detect
overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the
objective creds.

So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong:

1. task begins with <creds A> (as both objective and subjective creds),
   with refcount=2
2. task grabs an extra reference on <creds A> for overriding
3. task calls override_creds(<creds A>), which returns a pointer to the old
   subjective creds (<creds A>)
4. task enters AppArmor LSM hook
5. AppArmor checks that objective/subjective creds are equal
6. AppArmor replaces both cred pointers with <creds B> and drops 2 refs on
   <creds A>
7. task leaves AppArmor LSM hook
8. task calls revert_creds(<creds A>)
9. now task->cred is <creds A> while task->real_cred is <creds B>, but the
   task_struct logically holds two references to <creds B>
10. another task drops the extra reference on <creds A> that was used for
    overriding, refcount drops to 0
11. now task->real_cred points to freed creds

At this point, any access to current_cred() will be UAF.

I have a test case where I run aa-disable on a profile while a process
using that profile is blocked on splice() from a FUSE passthrough file into
a full pipe; after the profile update, the pipe becomes empty, splice()
resumes, the credentials go out of sync, and a subsequent getuid() syscall
results in a KASAN UAF splat.

To fix this, instead of directly replacing creds, do it via task_work that
will run at the end of the current syscall. (The point in time at which the
cred replacement happens should have no correctness impact; it is just a
performance optimization to avoid unnecessarily touching the refcount of
the new label.)

Note that AppArmor still performs direct cred replacements in the
sb_pivotroot LSM hook after this change, and that direct cred replacements
can still happen in VFS ->write() callbacks via proc_pid_attr_write().

There are two options for what to do with aa_dup_task_ctx(): Either
explicitly reset new->label_replacement_pending after the entire
aa_task_ctx has been copied, or switch to manually copying members over.
I am switching to manually copying members over because that should make
bugs more obvious.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c75afcd153f6 ("AppArmor: contexts used in attaching policy to system objects")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
[ preserved the 5.15 aa_set_current_onexec() return type and omitted unrelated newer-tree headers ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 security/apparmor/include/cred.h |  6 +-----
 security/apparmor/include/task.h | 15 +++++++++++----
 security/apparmor/task.c         | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
index 0b9ae4804ef73..ea38198277536 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
@@ -161,13 +161,9 @@ static inline struct aa_label *begin_current_label_crit_section(void)
 {
 	struct aa_label *label = aa_current_raw_label();
 
-	might_sleep();
-
 	if (label_is_stale(label)) {
 		label = aa_get_newest_label(label);
-		if (aa_replace_current_label(label) == 0)
-			/* task cred will keep the reference */
-			aa_put_label(label);
+		aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement();
 	}
 
 	return label;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/task.h b/security/apparmor/include/task.h
index f13d12373b25e..cdc8aead8c340 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/task.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/task.h
@@ -21,15 +21,22 @@ static inline struct aa_task_ctx *task_ctx(struct task_struct *task)
  * @onexec: profile to transition to on next exec  (MAY BE NULL)
  * @previous: profile the task may return to     (MAY BE NULL)
  * @token: magic value the task must know for returning to @previous_profile
+ * @label_replacement_tw: for aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement()
+ * @label_replacement_pending: is @label_replacement_tw pending?
+ *
+ * When changing this, check if aa_dup_task_ctx() needs to be updated.
  */
 struct aa_task_ctx {
 	struct aa_label *nnp;
 	struct aa_label *onexec;
 	struct aa_label *previous;
 	u64 token;
+	struct callback_head label_replacement_tw;
+	bool label_replacement_pending;
 };
 
 int aa_replace_current_label(struct aa_label *label);
+void aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement(void);
 int aa_set_current_onexec(struct aa_label *label, bool stack);
 int aa_set_current_hat(struct aa_label *label, u64 token);
 int aa_restore_previous_label(u64 cookie);
@@ -56,10 +63,10 @@ static inline void aa_free_task_ctx(struct aa_task_ctx *ctx)
 static inline void aa_dup_task_ctx(struct aa_task_ctx *new,
 				   const struct aa_task_ctx *old)
 {
-	*new = *old;
-	aa_get_label(new->nnp);
-	aa_get_label(new->previous);
-	aa_get_label(new->onexec);
+	new->nnp = aa_get_label(old->nnp);
+	new->onexec = aa_get_label(old->onexec);
+	new->previous = aa_get_label(old->previous);
+	new->token = old->token;
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/security/apparmor/task.c b/security/apparmor/task.c
index d17130ee6795d..4815aa8f637a7 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/task.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/task.c
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
  * should return to the previous cred if it has not been modified.
  */
 
+#include <linux/task_work.h>
+
 #include "include/cred.h"
 #include "include/task.h"
 
@@ -83,6 +85,32 @@ int aa_replace_current_label(struct aa_label *label)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void aa_replace_stale_label_tw_func(struct callback_head *tw)
+{
+	struct aa_task_ctx *ctx = task_ctx(current);
+	struct aa_label *label;
+
+	ctx->label_replacement_pending = false;
+	label = aa_current_raw_label();
+	if (!label_is_stale(label))
+		return;
+	label = aa_get_newest_label(label);
+	aa_replace_current_label(label);
+	aa_put_label(label);
+}
+
+/* replace the current task's stale label on syscall return */
+void aa_schedule_stale_label_replacement(void)
+{
+	struct aa_task_ctx *ctx = task_ctx(current);
+
+	if (ctx->label_replacement_pending)
+		return;
+	init_task_work(&ctx->label_replacement_tw, aa_replace_stale_label_tw_func);
+	if (task_work_add(current, &ctx->label_replacement_tw, TWA_RESUME) == 0)
+		ctx->label_replacement_pending = true;
+}
+
 
 /**
  * aa_set_current_onexec - set the tasks change_profile to happen onexec
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-03 15:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-03 10:45 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-03 15:32 ` [PATCH 5.15.y] apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section() Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox