* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
@ 2026-09-08 13:31 gregkh
2026-09-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] irqchip/stm32-exti: Split MCU and MPU code Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-09-08 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: junan76, antonio.borneo, radu, tglx; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x d31fbbade43f880b7e59e2b3a72722fe2725d93f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026090813-gallery-jackpot-25e8@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From d31fbbade43f880b7e59e2b3a72722fe2725d93f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:47:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout
HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT is passed to hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(), whose
timeout argument is in milliseconds, not microseconds:
atomic_delay += HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US;
if (atomic_delay > to * 1000)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
So stm32mp_exti_set_type() asks for a 1 second timeout where the comment
next to the macro says it wants 1 millisecond. The semaphore is polled
with udelay() from a section that holds chip_data->rlock, a
raw_spinlock_t, so preemption stays disabled for the whole wait on every
configuration, PREEMPT_RT included.
The hwspinlock core documents this explicitly:
If the mode is HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC (called from an atomic context) the
timeout is handled with busy-waiting delays, hence shall not exceed
few msecs.
Fixes: 5257169ade8c ("irqchip/stm32-exti: Use the hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic() API")
Signed-off-by: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260821024756.24927-2-junan76@163.com
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
index bf3a2def69ca..a19e91fbd010 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
#define IRQS_PER_BANK 32
-#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT 1000 /* usec */
+#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS 1
#define EXTI_EnCIDCFGR(n) (0x180 + (n) * 4)
#define EXTI_HWCFGR1 0x3f0
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int stm32mp_exti_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
raw_spin_lock(&chip_data->rlock);
if (hwlock) {
- err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+ err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
if (err) {
pr_err("%s can't get hwspinlock (%d)\n", __func__, err);
goto unlock;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] irqchip/stm32-exti: Split MCU and MPU code
2026-09-08 13:31 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-09-10 15:37 ` Sasha Levin
2026-09-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-10 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Antonio Borneo, Thomas Gleixner, Sasha Levin
From: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
[ Upstream commit 350755e2e548ccbe941d045900b57233efa906cb ]
Keep only the code for ARMv7m STM32 MCUs in in stm32-exti.c and split out
the code for ARMv7a & ARMv8a STM32MPxxx MPUs into stm32mp-exti.c
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620083115.204362-5-antonio.borneo@foss.st.com
Backport dependency adaptation for Linux 6.1:
The stable driver predates STM32MP_EXTI selection, standard device PM,
interrupts-extended mappings, and secure/RIF event handling. Importing the
upstream split would pull in those unrelated changes and new functions.
Limit this dependency to relocating the existing combined MCU/MPU driver
to irq-stm32mp-exti.c and updating its existing STM32_EXTI Makefile entry.
Keep Kconfig, syscore PM, interrupt mappings, and all existing functions.
Retain the upstream removal of unused hwspinlock handling from the MCU
set-type callback: MCU host initialization never assigns a hwspinlock.
This leaves the MPU callback as the only timeout user, so the target's
macro rename fixes all remaining users without leaving an undefined name.
Match the upstream timeout-definition context, including its two register
macros, so d31fbbade43f880b7e59e2b3a72722fe2725d93f applies unchanged. The
register macros remain unused; no secure/RIF behavior is introduced.
[ sashal: Reduced backport -- upstream 350755e2e548c touches 4 file(s), this
backport carries 2. Not backported here:
drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
This note is generated from the file lists only; see the resolution record
for the reasoning. ]
Stable-dep-of: d31fbbade43f ("irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
.../{irq-stm32-exti.c => irq-stm32mp-exti.c} | 21 ++++++-------------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
rename drivers/irqchip/{irq-stm32-exti.c => irq-stm32mp-exti.c} (98%)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
index f88cbf36a9d28..16a8e5e152a18 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_SEI) += irq-mvebu-sei.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LS_EXTIRQ) += irq-ls-extirq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI) += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_EXTI) += irq-stm32-exti.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_EXTI) += irq-stm32mp-exti.o
obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER) += qcom-irq-combiner.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_UNIPHIER_AIDET) += irq-uniphier-aidet.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SYNQUACER) += irq-sni-exiu.o
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
similarity index 98%
rename from drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
rename to drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
index 9c150c402f0ba..71a46e76d8320 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
@@ -22,9 +22,12 @@
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
-#define IRQS_PER_BANK 32
+#define IRQS_PER_BANK 32
-#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT 1000 /* usec */
+#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT 1000 /* usec */
+
+#define EXTI_EnCIDCFGR(n) (0x180 + (n) * 4)
+#define EXTI_HWCFGR1 0x3f0
struct stm32_exti_bank {
u32 imr_ofst;
@@ -306,33 +309,21 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data = gc->private;
const struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = chip_data->reg_bank;
- struct hwspinlock *hwlock = chip_data->host_data->hwlock;
u32 rtsr, ftsr;
int err;
irq_gc_lock(gc);
- if (hwlock) {
- err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
- if (err) {
- pr_err("%s can't get hwspinlock (%d)\n", __func__, err);
- goto unlock;
- }
- }
-
rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
err = stm32_exti_set_type(d, type, &rtsr, &ftsr);
if (err)
- goto unspinlock;
+ goto unlock;
irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
-unspinlock:
- if (hwlock)
- hwspin_unlock_in_atomic(hwlock);
unlock:
irq_gc_unlock(gc);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout
2026-09-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] irqchip/stm32-exti: Split MCU and MPU code Sasha Levin
@ 2026-09-10 15:37 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-10 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Ju Nan, Thomas Gleixner, Radu Rendec, Antonio Borneo, Sasha Levin
From: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
[ Upstream commit d31fbbade43f880b7e59e2b3a72722fe2725d93f ]
HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT is passed to hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(), whose
timeout argument is in milliseconds, not microseconds:
atomic_delay += HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US;
if (atomic_delay > to * 1000)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
So stm32mp_exti_set_type() asks for a 1 second timeout where the comment
next to the macro says it wants 1 millisecond. The semaphore is polled
with udelay() from a section that holds chip_data->rlock, a
raw_spinlock_t, so preemption stays disabled for the whole wait on every
configuration, PREEMPT_RT included.
The hwspinlock core documents this explicitly:
If the mode is HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC (called from an atomic context) the
timeout is handled with busy-waiting delays, hence shall not exceed
few msecs.
Fixes: 5257169ade8c ("irqchip/stm32-exti: Use the hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic() API")
Signed-off-by: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260821024756.24927-2-junan76@163.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
index 71a46e76d8320..85ed9fe52e6bc 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32mp-exti.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
#define IRQS_PER_BANK 32
-#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT 1000 /* usec */
+#define HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS 1
#define EXTI_EnCIDCFGR(n) (0x180 + (n) * 4)
#define EXTI_HWCFGR1 0x3f0
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static int stm32_exti_h_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
raw_spin_lock(&chip_data->rlock);
if (hwlock) {
- err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT);
+ err = hwspin_lock_timeout_in_atomic(hwlock, HWSPNLCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
if (err) {
pr_err("%s can't get hwspinlock (%d)\n", __func__, err);
goto unlock;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-10 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-08 13:31 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] irqchip/stm32-exti: Split MCU and MPU code Sasha Levin
2026-09-10 15:37 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] irqchip/stm32mp-exti: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).