* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
@ 2026-09-09 10:30 gregkh
2026-09-11 2:30 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Dynamically allocate shadow MMU's hashed page list Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-09-09 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: seanjc, michael.roth; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x b27622c4eeb125814081baaefe9175191be5b94d
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026090911-eats-threefold-66cf@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b27622c4eeb125814081baaefe9175191be5b94d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 13:49:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and
"back" halves
Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into a "front half" and a "back half", where
the front half is everything that runs with mmu_lock held for write, and
the back half is the code that runs outside of mmu_lock. This will allow
putting more code inside kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot()'s critical section
without having to take mmu_lock twice in quick succession.
No functional change intended.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
Reviewed-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260709204948.1988414-9-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 223d80b12b9b..a5c2a560a88a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -6921,20 +6921,11 @@ static void kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(kvm, &invalid_list);
}
-/*
- * Fast invalidate all shadow pages and use lock-break technique
- * to zap obsolete pages.
- *
- * It's required when memslot is being deleted or VM is being
- * destroyed, in these cases, we should ensure that KVM MMU does
- * not use any resource of the being-deleted slot or all slots
- * after calling the function.
- */
-static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
+static void __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_front_half(struct kvm *kvm)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
trace_kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
/*
@@ -6971,8 +6962,12 @@ static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_MMU_FREE_OBSOLETE_ROOTS);
kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(kvm);
+}
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+static void __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_back_half(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_not_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
/*
* Zap the invalidated TDP MMU roots, all SPTEs must be dropped before
@@ -6986,6 +6981,24 @@ static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(kvm, true);
}
+/*
+ * Fast invalidate all shadow pages and use lock-break technique
+ * to zap obsolete pages.
+ *
+ * It's required when memslot is being deleted or VM is being
+ * destroyed, in these cases, we should ensure that KVM MMU does
+ * not use any resource of the being-deleted slot or all slots
+ * after calling the function.
+ */
+static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_front_half(kvm);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_back_half(kvm);
+}
+
int kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
int r, i;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Dynamically allocate shadow MMU's hashed page list
2026-09-09 10:30 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-09-11 2:30 ` Sasha Levin
2026-09-11 2:31 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and "back" halves Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-11 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Sean Christopherson, Vipin Sharma, Xiaoyao Li, Sasha Levin
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
[ Upstream commit 039ef33e2f9346258fe2bd344f212c645942575e ]
Dynamically allocate the (massive) array of hashed lists used to track
shadow pages, as the array itself is 32KiB, i.e. is an order-3 allocation
all on its own, and is *exactly* an order-3 allocation. Dynamically
allocating the array will allow allocating "struct kvm" using kvmalloc(),
and will also allow deferring allocation of the array until it's actually
needed, i.e. until the first shadow root is allocated.
Opportunistically use kvmalloc() for the hashed lists, as an order-3
allocation is (stating the obvious) less likely to fail than an order-4
allocation, and the overhead of vmalloc() is undesirable given that the
size of the allocation is fixed.
Cc: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250523001138.3182794-3-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Stable-dep-of: b27622c4eeb1 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and "back" halves")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 ++++-
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index bb04de781b69d..565582cd96392 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
bool has_private_mem;
bool has_protected_state;
bool pre_fault_allowed;
- struct hlist_head mmu_page_hash[KVM_NUM_MMU_PAGES];
+ struct hlist_head *mmu_page_hash;
struct list_head active_mmu_pages;
struct list_head zapped_obsolete_pages;
/*
@@ -1954,7 +1954,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_vendor_module_exit(void);
void kvm_mmu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
+int kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
void kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
void kvm_mmu_init_memslot_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index b5a5e5c3cc5a5..8d46a307a2a3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3772,6 +3772,18 @@ static int mmu_alloc_direct_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return r;
}
+static int kvm_mmu_alloc_page_hash(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct hlist_head *h;
+
+ h = kvcalloc(KVM_NUM_MMU_PAGES, sizeof(*h), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ if (!h)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash = h;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int mmu_first_shadow_root_alloc(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct kvm_memslots *slots;
@@ -6542,14 +6554,20 @@ static bool kvm_has_zapped_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
return unlikely(!list_empty_careful(&kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages));
}
-void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
+int kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
+ int r;
+
kvm->arch.shadow_mmio_value = shadow_mmio_value;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.possible_nx_huge_pages);
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.mmu_unsync_pages_lock);
+ r = kvm_mmu_alloc_page_hash(kvm);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(kvm);
@@ -6560,6 +6578,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm->arch.split_desc_cache.kmem_cache = pte_list_desc_cache;
kvm->arch.split_desc_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
+ return 0;
}
static void mmu_free_vm_memory_caches(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -6571,6 +6590,8 @@ static void mmu_free_vm_memory_caches(struct kvm *kvm)
void kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
+ kvfree(kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash);
+
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(kvm);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9e7c9e3edb5b4..a9c3063ce7841 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -12824,7 +12824,9 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
if (ret)
goto out;
- kvm_mmu_init_vm(kvm);
+ ret = kvm_mmu_init_vm(kvm);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_cleanup_page_track;
ret = kvm_x86_call(vm_init)(kvm);
if (ret)
@@ -12869,6 +12871,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
out_uninit_mmu:
kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(kvm);
+out_cleanup_page_track:
kvm_page_track_cleanup(kvm);
out:
return ret;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6.12.y 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and "back" halves
2026-09-11 2:30 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Dynamically allocate shadow MMU's hashed page list Sasha Levin
@ 2026-09-11 2:31 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-11 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Sean Christopherson, Michael Roth, Sasha Levin
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
[ Upstream commit b27622c4eeb125814081baaefe9175191be5b94d ]
Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into a "front half" and a "back half", where
the front half is everything that runs with mmu_lock held for write, and
the back half is the code that runs outside of mmu_lock. This will allow
putting more code inside kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot()'s critical section
without having to take mmu_lock twice in quick succession.
No functional change intended.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
Reviewed-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260709204948.1988414-9-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 8d46a307a2a3b..1c9d6132e24ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -6489,20 +6489,11 @@ static void kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(kvm, &kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages);
}
-/*
- * Fast invalidate all shadow pages and use lock-break technique
- * to zap obsolete pages.
- *
- * It's required when memslot is being deleted or VM is being
- * destroyed, in these cases, we should ensure that KVM MMU does
- * not use any resource of the being-deleted slot or all slots
- * after calling the function.
- */
-static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
+static void __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_front_half(struct kvm *kvm)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
trace_kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
/*
@@ -6534,8 +6525,12 @@ static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_MMU_FREE_OBSOLETE_ROOTS);
kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(kvm);
+}
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+static void __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_back_half(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_not_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
/*
* Zap the invalidated TDP MMU roots, all SPTEs must be dropped before
@@ -6554,6 +6549,24 @@ static bool kvm_has_zapped_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
return unlikely(!list_empty_careful(&kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages));
}
+/*
+ * Fast invalidate all shadow pages and use lock-break technique
+ * to zap obsolete pages.
+ *
+ * It's required when memslot is being deleted or VM is being
+ * destroyed, in these cases, we should ensure that KVM MMU does
+ * not use any resource of the being-deleted slot or all slots
+ * after calling the function.
+ */
+static void kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_front_half(kvm);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ __kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast_back_half(kvm);
+}
+
int kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
int r;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-11 2:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-09 10:30 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-11 2:30 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Dynamically allocate shadow MMU's hashed page list Sasha Levin
2026-09-11 2:31 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Split kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() into "front" and "back" halves Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox