FAILED: patch "[PATCH] accel/ivpu: Validate full buffer range in ivpu_to_cpu_addr" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] accel/ivpu: Validate full buffer range in ivpu_to_cpu_addr" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 3837c3f29fbc3b8c12bebf5c62741e2befe3482a
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026091646-nutmeg-dill-a3d1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' 'HEAD^..'

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 3837c3f29fbc3b8c12bebf5c62741e2befe3482a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Magdalena Schulfer <magdalena.schulfer@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:57:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] accel/ivpu: Validate full buffer range in ivpu_to_cpu_addr

Add a size parameter to ivpu_to_cpu_addr() and validate that the
whole [vpu_addr, vpu_addr + size) range stays within the BO.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 647371a6609d ("accel/ivpu: Add GEM buffer object management")
Signed-off-by: Magdalena Schulfer <magdalena.schulfer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawid Osuchowski <dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Wachowski <karol.wachowski@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Karol Wachowski <karol.wachowski@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260901125749.404338-2-dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com

diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h
index 0c3350f22b55..b1ae020a4fc2 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.h
@@ -87,15 +87,23 @@ static inline bool ivpu_bo_is_resident(struct ivpu_bo *bo)
 	return !!bo->base.pages;
 }
 
-static inline void *ivpu_to_cpu_addr(struct ivpu_bo *bo, u32 vpu_addr)
+static inline void *ivpu_to_cpu_addr(struct ivpu_bo *bo, u64 vpu_addr, u64 size)
 {
+	u64 bo_size = ivpu_bo_size(bo);
+	u64 offset;
+
 	if (vpu_addr < bo->vpu_addr)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (vpu_addr >= (bo->vpu_addr + ivpu_bo_size(bo)))
+	if (size > bo_size)
 		return NULL;
 
-	return ivpu_bo_vaddr(bo) + (vpu_addr - bo->vpu_addr);
+	offset = vpu_addr - bo->vpu_addr;
+
+	if (offset > bo_size - size)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return ivpu_bo_vaddr(bo) + offset;
 }
 
 static inline u32 cpu_to_vpu_addr(struct ivpu_bo *bo, void *cpu_addr)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c
index 62607ec8ca8f..8e960293b77a 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_ipc.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ ivpu_ipc_tx_prepare(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct ivpu_ipc_consumer *cons,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	tx_buf = ivpu_to_cpu_addr(ipc->mem_tx, tx_buf_vpu_addr);
+	tx_buf = ivpu_to_cpu_addr(ipc->mem_tx, tx_buf_vpu_addr, sizeof(*tx_buf));
 	if (drm_WARN_ON(&vdev->drm, !tx_buf)) {
 		gen_pool_free(ipc->mm_tx, tx_buf_vpu_addr, sizeof(*tx_buf));
 		return -EIO;
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ void ivpu_ipc_irq_handler(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
 			return;
 		}
 
-		ipc_hdr = ivpu_to_cpu_addr(ipc->mem_rx, vpu_addr);
+		ipc_hdr = ivpu_to_cpu_addr(ipc->mem_rx, vpu_addr, sizeof(*ipc_hdr));
 		if (!ipc_hdr) {
 			ivpu_warn_ratelimited(vdev, "IPC msg 0x%x out of range\n", vpu_addr);
 			continue;
@@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ void ivpu_ipc_irq_handler(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
 
 		jsm_msg = NULL;
 		if (ipc_hdr->channel != IVPU_IPC_CHAN_BOOT_MSG) {
-			jsm_msg = ivpu_to_cpu_addr(ipc->mem_rx, ipc_hdr->data_addr);
+			jsm_msg = ivpu_to_cpu_addr(ipc->mem_rx, ipc_hdr->data_addr,
+						   sizeof(*jsm_msg));
 			if (!jsm_msg) {
 				ivpu_warn_ratelimited(vdev, "JSM msg 0x%x out of range\n",
 						      ipc_hdr->data_addr);