* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree
@ 2026-10-21 14:50 gregkh
2026-10-22 12:55 ` [PATCH 7.2.y] sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers bypassed by an ancestor Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-10-21 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tj, arighi; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 7.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5bdeca322a6f8d10acaf67cccab1f69747ee7be3
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026102105-slicing-rupture-e72c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.2.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 5bdeca322a6f8d10acaf67cccab1f69747ee7be3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 11:35:12 -1000
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers
bypassed by an ancestor
scx_bypass() claims bypass dispatch when the scheduler's depth goes from
zero to one and releases it when the depth returns to zero, but propagates
only the depth to the descendants, not the claim. A descendant that starts
bypassing with its ancestor never claims, and one whose own bypass ends
under the ancestor's keeps its claim, as its depth does not return to zero.
A sub-scheduler enable whose bypass ends under a PM suspend thus leaks its
claim: the parent keeps hosting bypass dispatch and the sub-scheduler's next
bypass trips the WARN_ON_ONCE() on the claim. A sub-scheduler disable that
starts under a PM suspend has no claim, so once the resume lifts the root's
bypass its tasks sit on the parent's bypass DSQs with nobody consuming them.
Claim for every descendant whose depth goes from zero to one in the
propagation and release every scheduler in the subtree whose depth returned
to zero once the tasks have moved out of the bypass DSQs. A parent that is
bypassing itself when a descendant claims consumes only its own bypass DSQs,
empty until it leaves bypass and becomes the host.
Fixes: aa2a0a19686c ("sched_ext: Separate bypass dispatch enabling from bypass depth tracking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1+
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 3edb51bdd0ef..7303c2c45964 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -6099,15 +6099,12 @@ static void enable_bypass_dsp(struct scx_sched *sch)
/*
* When a sub-sched bypasses, its tasks are queued on the bypass DSQs of
- * the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or root. As enable_bypass_dsp() is
- * called iff @sch is not already bypassed due to an ancestor bypassing,
- * we can assume that the parent is not bypassing and thus will be the
- * host of the bypass DSQs.
- *
- * While the situation may change in the future, the following
- * guarantees that the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or root has bypass
- * dispatch enabled while a descendant is bypassing, which is all that's
- * required.
+ * the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or root. The parent hosts them
+ * unless it is bypassing too. Then they sit further up and the parent
+ * consumes only its own bypass DSQs, empty until it leaves bypass and
+ * becomes the host. Either way the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or
+ * root has bypass dispatch enabled while a descendant is bypassing,
+ * which is all that's required.
*
* scx_bypass_dsp_enabled() test is used to determine whether to enter
* the bypass dispatch handling path from both bypassing and hosting
@@ -6232,16 +6229,19 @@ void scx_bypass(struct scx_sched *sch, bool bypass)
* Bypass state is propagated to all descendants - an scx_sched bypasses
* if itself or any of its ancestors are in bypass mode. A descendant's
* depth is the sum of its own bypasses and its ancestors', so every
- * call propagates whether or not @sch changed state.
+ * call propagates whether or not @sch changed state. The descendants'
+ * claims are released below with @sch's, after their tasks have moved.
*/
raw_spin_lock(&scx_sched_lock);
scx_for_each_descendant_pre(pos, sch) {
if (pos == sch)
continue;
- if (bypass)
- inc_bypass_depth(pos);
- else
+ if (bypass) {
+ if (inc_bypass_depth(pos))
+ enable_bypass_dsp(pos);
+ } else {
dec_bypass_depth(pos);
+ }
}
raw_spin_unlock(&scx_sched_lock);
@@ -6330,8 +6330,12 @@ void scx_bypass(struct scx_sched *sch, bool bypass)
}
/* disarming must come after moving all tasks out of the bypass DSQs */
- if (!bypass)
- scx_disable_bypass_dsp(sch);
+ if (!bypass) {
+ guard(raw_spinlock)(&scx_sched_lock);
+ scx_for_each_descendant_pre(pos, sch)
+ if (!pos->bypass_depth)
+ scx_disable_bypass_dsp(pos);
+ }
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&scx_bypass_lock, flags);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [PATCH 7.2.y] sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers bypassed by an ancestor
2026-10-21 14:50 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-10-22 12:55 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-10-22 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Tejun Heo, Andrea Righi, Sasha Levin
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5bdeca322a6f8d10acaf67cccab1f69747ee7be3 ]
scx_bypass() claims bypass dispatch when the scheduler's depth goes from
zero to one and releases it when the depth returns to zero, but propagates
only the depth to the descendants, not the claim. A descendant that starts
bypassing with its ancestor never claims, and one whose own bypass ends
under the ancestor's keeps its claim, as its depth does not return to zero.
A sub-scheduler enable whose bypass ends under a PM suspend thus leaks its
claim: the parent keeps hosting bypass dispatch and the sub-scheduler's next
bypass trips the WARN_ON_ONCE() on the claim. A sub-scheduler disable that
starts under a PM suspend has no claim, so once the resume lifts the root's
bypass its tasks sit on the parent's bypass DSQs with nobody consuming them.
Claim for every descendant whose depth goes from zero to one in the
propagation and release every scheduler in the subtree whose depth returned
to zero once the tasks have moved out of the bypass DSQs. A parent that is
bypassing itself when a descendant claims consumes only its own bypass DSQs,
empty until it leaves bypass and becomes the host.
Fixes: aa2a0a19686c ("sched_ext: Separate bypass dispatch enabling from bypass depth tracking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1+
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
[ sashal: Changed scx_disable_bypass_dsp() calls to disable_bypass_dsp(). ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index e8497c967763d..515829b53a8cc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -5708,15 +5708,12 @@ static void enable_bypass_dsp(struct scx_sched *sch)
/*
* When a sub-sched bypasses, its tasks are queued on the bypass DSQs of
- * the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or root. As enable_bypass_dsp() is
- * called iff @sch is not already bypassed due to an ancestor bypassing,
- * we can assume that the parent is not bypassing and thus will be the
- * host of the bypass DSQs.
- *
- * While the situation may change in the future, the following
- * guarantees that the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or root has bypass
- * dispatch enabled while a descendant is bypassing, which is all that's
- * required.
+ * the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or root. The parent hosts them
+ * unless it is bypassing too. Then they sit further up and the parent
+ * consumes only its own bypass DSQs, empty until it leaves bypass and
+ * becomes the host. Either way the nearest non-bypassing ancestor or
+ * root has bypass dispatch enabled while a descendant is bypassing,
+ * which is all that's required.
*
* bypass_dsp_enabled() test is used to determine whether to enter the
* bypass dispatch handling path from both bypassing and hosting scheds.
@@ -5809,16 +5806,19 @@ static void scx_bypass(struct scx_sched *sch, bool bypass)
* Bypass state is propagated to all descendants - an scx_sched bypasses
* if itself or any of its ancestors are in bypass mode. A descendant's
* depth is the sum of its own bypasses and its ancestors', so every
- * call propagates whether or not @sch changed state.
+ * call propagates whether or not @sch changed state. The descendants'
+ * claims are released below with @sch's, after their tasks have moved.
*/
raw_spin_lock(&scx_sched_lock);
scx_for_each_descendant_pre(pos, sch) {
if (pos == sch)
continue;
- if (bypass)
- inc_bypass_depth(pos);
- else
+ if (bypass) {
+ if (inc_bypass_depth(pos))
+ enable_bypass_dsp(pos);
+ } else {
dec_bypass_depth(pos);
+ }
}
raw_spin_unlock(&scx_sched_lock);
@@ -5894,8 +5894,12 @@ static void scx_bypass(struct scx_sched *sch, bool bypass)
}
/* disarming must come after moving all tasks out of the bypass DSQs */
- if (!bypass)
- disable_bypass_dsp(sch);
+ if (!bypass) {
+ guard(raw_spinlock)(&scx_sched_lock);
+ scx_for_each_descendant_pre(pos, sch)
+ if (!pos->bypass_depth)
+ disable_bypass_dsp(pos);
+ }
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&scx_bypass_lock, flags);
}
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-22 12:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-21 14:50 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree gregkh
2026-10-22 12:55 ` [PATCH 7.2.y] sched_ext: Fix the bypass dispatch claim for schedulers bypassed by an ancestor Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox