From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sean@mess.org,hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] media: rc: Add missing locking for keymap" failed to apply to 7.3-stable tree
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 15:32:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026110424-pamperer-waltz-9ca3@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 7.3-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.3.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x ab9567336171e46ce9e03ee126902b3fd7901baa
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026110424-pamperer-waltz-9ca3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.3.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ab9567336171e46ce9e03ee126902b3fd7901baa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:03:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] media: rc: Add missing locking for keymap
When the rc_map for an rc_dev gets updated, locking is required but is
missing in places. A concurrent scancode lookup and a call to
rc_{register,unregistered}_device() could result in a use-after-free;
this could happen if IR is decoded during those function calls.
Add lockdep assertions where locks are required.
ir_free_table() should only be called for non-TX devices else we will
use a spinlock without iniitializing it.
Fixes: dccc0c3ddf8f ("media: rc: fix race between unregister and urb/irq callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c b/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
index 53e39b7a489a..67d86b8ea5e0 100644
--- a/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
+++ b/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
@@ -104,7 +104,6 @@ static struct rc_map_list *seek_rc_map(const char *name)
struct rc_map *rc_map_get(const char *name)
{
-
struct rc_map_list *map;
map = seek_rc_map(name);
@@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ static int scancode_to_u64(const struct input_keymap_entry *ke, u64 *scancode)
* ir_create_table() - initializes a scancode table
* @dev: the rc_dev device
* @rc_map: the rc_map to initialize
- * @name: name to assign to the table
+ * @map_name: name to assign to the table
* @rc_proto: ir type to assign to the new table
* @size: initial size of the table
*
@@ -211,23 +210,31 @@ static int scancode_to_u64(const struct input_keymap_entry *ke, u64 *scancode)
* return: zero on success or a negative error code
*/
static int ir_create_table(struct rc_dev *dev, struct rc_map *rc_map,
- const char *name, u64 rc_proto, size_t size)
+ const char *map_name, u64 rc_proto, size_t size)
{
+ struct rc_map_table *scan;
unsigned int alloc;
- rc_map->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rc_map->name)
+ char *name;
+
+ name = kstrdup(map_name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!name)
return -ENOMEM;
+
alloc = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
- rc_map->rc_proto = rc_proto;
- rc_map->len = 0;
- rc_map->size = alloc;
- rc_map->scan = kmalloc_objs(struct rc_map_table, alloc, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rc_map->scan) {
- kfree(rc_map->name);
- rc_map->name = NULL;
+ scan = kmalloc_objs(struct rc_map_table, alloc, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!scan) {
+ kfree(name);
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &rc_map->lock) {
+ rc_map->name = name;
+ rc_map->scan = scan;
+ rc_map->rc_proto = rc_proto;
+ rc_map->len = 0;
+ rc_map->size = alloc;
+ }
+
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Allocated space for %u keycode entries (%zu bytes)\n",
alloc, alloc * sizeof(struct rc_map_table));
return 0;
@@ -237,16 +244,26 @@ static int ir_create_table(struct rc_dev *dev, struct rc_map *rc_map,
* ir_free_table() - frees memory allocated by a scancode table
* @rc_map: the table whose mappings need to be freed
*
- * This routine will free memory alloctaed for key mappings used by given
+ * This routine will free memory allocated for key mappings used by given
* scancode table.
*/
static void ir_free_table(struct rc_map *rc_map)
{
- rc_map->size = 0;
- kfree(rc_map->name);
- rc_map->name = NULL;
- kfree(rc_map->scan);
- rc_map->scan = NULL;
+ struct rc_map_table *scan;
+ const char *name;
+
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &rc_map->lock) {
+ name = rc_map->name;
+ scan = rc_map->scan;
+
+ rc_map->size = 0;
+ rc_map->len = 0;
+ rc_map->name = NULL;
+ rc_map->scan = NULL;
+ }
+
+ kfree(name);
+ kfree(scan);
}
/**
@@ -266,6 +283,8 @@ static int ir_resize_table(struct rc_dev *dev, struct rc_map *rc_map,
unsigned int newsize = rc_map->size;
struct rc_map_table *newscan;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rc_map->lock);
+
if (rc_map->size == rc_map->len) {
/* All entries in use -> grow keytable */
if (newsize >= IR_TAB_MAX_ENTRIES)
@@ -317,6 +336,8 @@ static unsigned int ir_update_mapping(struct rc_dev *dev,
int old_keycode = rc_map->scan[index].keycode;
int i;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rc_map->lock);
+
/* Did the user wish to remove the mapping? */
if (new_keycode == KEY_RESERVED || new_keycode == KEY_UNKNOWN) {
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "#%d: Deleting scan 0x%04llx\n",
@@ -372,6 +393,8 @@ static unsigned int ir_establish_scancode(struct rc_dev *dev,
{
unsigned int i;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rc_map->lock);
+
/*
* Unfortunately, some hardware-based IR decoders don't provide
* all bits for the complete IR code. In general, they provide only
@@ -396,7 +419,7 @@ static unsigned int ir_establish_scancode(struct rc_dev *dev,
/* No previous mapping found, we might need to grow the table */
if (rc_map->size == rc_map->len) {
if (!resize || ir_resize_table(dev, rc_map, GFP_ATOMIC))
- return -1U;
+ return UINT_MAX;
}
/* i is the proper index to insert our new keycode */
@@ -478,16 +501,18 @@ static int ir_setkeytable(struct rc_dev *dev, const struct rc_map *from)
if (rc)
return rc;
- for (i = 0; i < from->size; i++) {
- index = ir_establish_scancode(dev, rc_map,
- from->scan[i].scancode, false);
- if (index >= rc_map->len) {
- rc = -ENOMEM;
- break;
- }
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &rc_map->lock) {
+ for (i = 0; i < from->size; i++) {
+ index = ir_establish_scancode(dev, rc_map,
+ from->scan[i].scancode, false);
+ if (index >= rc_map->len) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ break;
+ }
- ir_update_mapping(dev, rc_map, index,
- from->scan[i].keycode);
+ ir_update_mapping(dev, rc_map, index,
+ from->scan[i].keycode);
+ }
}
if (rc)
@@ -523,6 +548,8 @@ static unsigned int ir_lookup_by_scancode(const struct rc_map *rc_map,
{
struct rc_map_table *res;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rc_map->lock);
+
res = bsearch(&scancode, rc_map->scan, rc_map->len,
sizeof(struct rc_map_table), rc_map_cmp);
if (!res)
@@ -1989,7 +2016,8 @@ out_rx_free:
scoped_guard(mutex, &dev->lock)
dev->registered = false;
out_free_table:
- ir_free_table(&dev->rc_map);
+ if (dev->driver_type != RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW_TX)
+ ir_free_table(&dev->rc_map);
out_raw:
ida_free(&rc_ida, minor);
return rc;
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 14:32 gregkh [this message]
2026-11-05 2:00 ` [PATCH 7.3.y 1/2] media: rc: Replace open coded krealloc() for keymap Sasha Levin
2026-11-05 2:00 ` [PATCH 7.3.y 2/2] media: rc: Add missing locking " Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026110424-pamperer-waltz-9ca3@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@mess.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox