Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree
@ 2026-11-07 10:06 Sasha Levin
  2026-11-10 11:50 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/3] media: i2c: imx219: Replace exposure magic value with named constant Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-07 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sakari.ailus, dave.stevenson, laurent.pinchart; +Cc: stable

The patch below does not apply to the 6.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.18.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 57043aef0a04bd96d97881422590e71c1e4c45b1
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '20261107050653-failed-6.18-57043aef0a04@kernel.org' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.18.y' 'HEAD^..'

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 57043aef0a04bd96d97881422590e71c1e4c45b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:16:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps

The controls that are divided by the rate_factor before writing them to
the registers have the step of the value of the rate_factor. Take this
into account when the control's range is modified. The controls are
created in a configuration where rate_factor is always 1, hence there's no
need to change the code adding new controls.

Fixes: f513997119f4 ("media: i2c: imx219: Scale the pixel rate for analog binning")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
index 5184523de8bed..b1f29037af742 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
@@ -340,13 +340,13 @@ static const struct imx219_mode supported_modes[] = {
 		/* 2x2 binned 60fps mode */
 		.width = 1640,
 		.height = 1232,
-		.fll_def = 1707,
+		.fll_def = 1706,
 	},
 	{
 		/* 640x480 60fps mode */
 		.width = 640,
 		.height = 480,
-		.fll_def = 1707,
+		.fll_def = 1706,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -473,8 +473,7 @@ static int imx219_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
 					       imx219->exposure->minimum,
 					       exposure_max,
-					       imx219->exposure->step,
-					       exposure_def);
+					       rate_factor, exposure_def);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -902,7 +901,8 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 
 		/* Update limits and set FPS to default */
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->vblank, IMX219_VBLANK_MIN,
-					       IMX219_FLL_MAX - mode->height, 1,
+					       IMX219_FLL_MAX - mode->height,
+					       rate_factor,
 					       mode->fll_def - mode->height);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -920,8 +920,7 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
 					       imx219->exposure->minimum,
 					       exposure_max,
-					       imx219->exposure->step,
-					       exposure_def);
+					       rate_factor, exposure_def);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -946,8 +945,7 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 			return ret;
 
 		/* Scale the pixel rate based on the mode specific factor */
-		pixel_rate = imx219_get_pixel_rate(imx219) *
-			     imx219_get_rate_factor(state);
+		pixel_rate = imx219_get_pixel_rate(imx219) * rate_factor;
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->pixel_rate, pixel_rate,
 					       pixel_rate, 1, pixel_rate);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.53.0





^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.18.y 1/3] media: i2c: imx219: Replace exposure magic value with named constant
  2026-11-07 10:06 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree Sasha Levin
@ 2026-11-10 11:50 ` Sasha Levin
  2026-11-10 11:50   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 2/3] media: imx219: Account rate_factor in setting upper exposure limit Sasha Levin
  2026-11-10 11:50   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 3/3] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-10 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Tarang Raval, Dave Stevenson, Kieran Bingham, Sakari Ailus,
	Hans Verkuil, Sasha Levin

From: Tarang Raval <tarang.raval@siliconsignals.io>

[ Upstream commit 9a9ba098e7ba6b89efaddeabf0716a84a0f54c99 ]

Introduce IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET (4) and use it instead of the literal
'4' when computing the maximum coarse exposure. The IMX219 datasheet
specifies the maximum storage time as frame_length_lines - 4.
(Ref: Datasheet section 5-7-1)

Also fix one indentation issue for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Tarang Raval <tarang.raval@siliconsignals.io>
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 57043aef0a04 ("media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
Depends on <20261110032344.182965-1-sashal@kernel.org>

 drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
index 76e65cedbb32f..4160a482fdce3 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
 #define IMX219_EXPOSURE_STEP		1
 #define IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT		0x640
 #define IMX219_EXPOSURE_MAX		65535
+#define IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET			4
 
 /* V_TIMING internal */
 #define IMX219_REG_FRM_LENGTH_A		CCI_REG16(0x0160)
@@ -461,9 +462,9 @@ static int imx219_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
 		int exposure_max, exposure_def;
 
 		/* Update max exposure while meeting expected vblanking */
-		exposure_max = format->height + ctrl->val - 4;
+		exposure_max = format->height + ctrl->val - IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET;
 		exposure_def = (exposure_max < IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT) ?
-			exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
+				exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
 					       imx219->exposure->minimum,
 					       exposure_max,
@@ -591,9 +592,9 @@ static int imx219_init_controls(struct imx219 *imx219)
 					   IMX219_LLP_MAX - mode->width,
 					   IMX219_LLP_STEP,
 					   IMX219_LLP_MIN - mode->width);
-	exposure_max = mode->fll_def - 4;
+	exposure_max = mode->fll_def - IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET;
 	exposure_def = (exposure_max < IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT) ?
-		exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
+			exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
 	imx219->exposure = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(ctrl_hdlr, &imx219_ctrl_ops,
 					     V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE,
 					     IMX219_EXPOSURE_MIN, exposure_max,
@@ -912,9 +913,9 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 			return ret;
 
 		/* Update max exposure while meeting expected vblanking */
-		exposure_max = mode->fll_def - 4;
+		exposure_max = mode->fll_def - IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET;
 		exposure_def = (exposure_max < IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT) ?
-			exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
+				exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
 					       imx219->exposure->minimum,
 					       exposure_max,
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.18.y 2/3] media: imx219: Account rate_factor in setting upper exposure limit
  2026-11-10 11:50 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/3] media: i2c: imx219: Replace exposure magic value with named constant Sasha Levin
@ 2026-11-10 11:50   ` Sasha Levin
  2026-11-10 11:50   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 3/3] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-10 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Sakari Ailus, Dave Stevenson, Laurent Pinchart, Sasha Levin

From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit db111b66f2db7f3f79d9359f4a9762e832d6fde9 ]

The rate_factor multiplier is used to multiply a few values in the
sensor's timing configuration and the exposure time is one of them. This
also needs to be taken into account in exposure time margin: multiply it
by rate_factor so that sensor's exposure time margin is respected.

Fixes: f513997119f4 ("media: i2c: imx219: Scale the pixel rate for analog binning")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Stable-dep-of: 57043aef0a04 ("media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
index 4160a482fdce3..87c4d8942135c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
@@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ static int imx219_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
 		int exposure_max, exposure_def;
 
 		/* Update max exposure while meeting expected vblanking */
-		exposure_max = format->height + ctrl->val - IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET;
+		exposure_max = format->height + ctrl->val -
+			IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET * rate_factor;
 		exposure_def = (exposure_max < IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT) ?
 				exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
@@ -895,6 +896,7 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 	crop->top = (IMX219_NATIVE_HEIGHT - crop->height) / 2;
 
 	if (fmt->which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE) {
+		int rate_factor = imx219_get_rate_factor(state);
 		int exposure_max;
 		int exposure_def;
 		int hblank, llp_min;
@@ -913,7 +915,8 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 			return ret;
 
 		/* Update max exposure while meeting expected vblanking */
-		exposure_max = mode->fll_def - IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET;
+		exposure_max = mode->fll_def -
+			IMX219_EXPOSURE_OFFSET * rate_factor;
 		exposure_def = (exposure_max < IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT) ?
 				exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6.18.y 3/3] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps
  2026-11-10 11:50 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/3] media: i2c: imx219: Replace exposure magic value with named constant Sasha Levin
  2026-11-10 11:50   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 2/3] media: imx219: Account rate_factor in setting upper exposure limit Sasha Levin
@ 2026-11-10 11:50   ` Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-10 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Sakari Ailus, Dave Stevenson, Laurent Pinchart, Sasha Levin

From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 57043aef0a04bd96d97881422590e71c1e4c45b1 ]

The controls that are divided by the rate_factor before writing them to
the registers have the step of the value of the rate_factor. Take this
into account when the control's range is modified. The controls are
created in a configuration where rate_factor is always 1, hence there's no
need to change the code adding new controls.

Fixes: f513997119f4 ("media: i2c: imx219: Scale the pixel rate for analog binning")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
index 87c4d8942135c..e399a87f99266 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
@@ -326,13 +326,13 @@ static const struct imx219_mode supported_modes[] = {
 		/* 2x2 binned 60fps mode */
 		.width = 1640,
 		.height = 1232,
-		.fll_def = 1707,
+		.fll_def = 1706,
 	},
 	{
 		/* 640x480 60fps mode */
 		.width = 640,
 		.height = 480,
-		.fll_def = 1707,
+		.fll_def = 1706,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -469,8 +469,7 @@ static int imx219_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
 					       imx219->exposure->minimum,
 					       exposure_max,
-					       imx219->exposure->step,
-					       exposure_def);
+					       rate_factor, exposure_def);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -904,7 +903,8 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 
 		/* Update limits and set FPS to default */
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->vblank, IMX219_VBLANK_MIN,
-					       IMX219_FLL_MAX - mode->height, 1,
+					       IMX219_FLL_MAX - mode->height,
+					       rate_factor,
 					       mode->fll_def - mode->height);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -922,8 +922,7 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->exposure,
 					       imx219->exposure->minimum,
 					       exposure_max,
-					       imx219->exposure->step,
-					       exposure_def);
+					       rate_factor, exposure_def);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -956,8 +955,7 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
 			return ret;
 
 		/* Scale the pixel rate based on the mode specific factor */
-		pixel_rate = imx219_get_pixel_rate(imx219) *
-			     imx219_get_rate_factor(state);
+		pixel_rate = imx219_get_pixel_rate(imx219) * rate_factor;
 		ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->pixel_rate, pixel_rate,
 					       pixel_rate, 1, pixel_rate);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-10 11:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-07 10:06 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 11:50 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/3] media: i2c: imx219: Replace exposure magic value with named constant Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 11:50   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 2/3] media: imx219: Account rate_factor in setting upper exposure limit Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 11:50   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 3/3] media: imx219: Account for rate_factor in control steps Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox